Texas law on any date › Code of Criminal Procedure
Code of Criminal Procedure §5
In force on Sep 01, 2017 · this text took effect Sep 01, 2017 · amended later, effective Jan 01, 2021
(a) Any evidence or expert testimony presented by the state or the defendant on the subject of eyewitness identification is admissible only subject to compliance with the Texas Rules of Evidence. Except as provided by Subsection (c), evidence of compliance with the model policy or any other policy adopted under this article is not a condition precedent to the admissibility of an out-of-court eyewitness identification.
(b) Notwithstanding Article 38.23 as that article relates to a violation of a state statute and except as provided by Subsection (c), a failure to conduct a photograph or live lineup identification procedure in substantial compliance with the model policy or any other policy adopted under this article does not bar the admission of eyewitness identification testimony in the courts of this state.
(c) If a witness who has previously made an out-of-court photograph or live lineup identification of the accused makes an in-court identification of the accused, the eyewitness identification is admissible into evidence against the accused only if the evidence is accompanied by the details of each prior photograph or live lineup identification made of the accused by the witness, including the manner in which the identification procedure was conducted.
History: Added by Acts 2011, 82nd Leg., R.S., Ch. 219 (H.B. 215 ), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2011. Amended by: Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 686 (H.B. 34 ), Sec. 4, eff. September 1, 2017. Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 686 (H.B. 34 ), Sec. 5, eff. September 1, 2017.
Source: the Legislature's file server, seen Nov 08, 2026.
Every version on file
- Effective Jan 01, 2021 · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective Sep 01, 2017 · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective May 18, 2013 · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective May 18, 2013 · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective Aug 27, 1973 · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
Attorney General opinions that cite it
- KP-0010 (Sep 26, 2014): Programs to which jurors may donate their juror reimbursement under subsection 61.003(a)(4) of the Government Code
- GA-1077 (Feb 24, 2014): Whether the early termination of deferred adjudication is a reportable conviction or adjudication for ptu])Oses of chapter 62 of the Code of Crimjnal Procedure
- GA-0927 (Nov 02, 2011): Whether article 4.19 of the Code of Criminal Procedure permits a child under the age of seventeen who has been transferred to criminal court for prosecution to be detained in a facility that does not comply with subsection 51.12(f) of the Family Code
- GA-0888 (May 06, 2011): Whether a prosecutor must obtain the approval of the presiding judge before advancing funds for travel expenses to a nonresident witness
- GA-0680 (May 13, 2008): Whether the Texas Department of Insurance may access criminal history record information that is subjectto anondisclosure orderunder Government Code section 411.081(d)
- GA-0256 (Apr 09, 2004): Whether a commissioned peace officer employed by the state or a political subdivision violates section 36.07 of the Penal Code by working off-duty for a private employer
- JM-1131 (Dec 29, 1989): Applicability of article and Drug Abuse 5561cc, V.T.C.S., to local 1705 Guadalupe substance abuse treatment Austin, Texas 78701-1214 facilities or court residen- tial treatment facilities
- JM-0759 (Jul 28, 1987): Whether the TexasDepartment of Corrections granting of good time to prisoners for time iu- carcerated in a county jail vio- lates section 3(c) of article 6181-l. V.T.C.S.
- WW-0998 (Feb 23, 1961): Constitutionality of H. B. 57, amending Article 680, Code of Criminal Procedure of Texas, to provide for alternate jurors in felony cases'when a juror becomes unable or disqualified to continue. The Criminal Jurisprudence Committee of the House of Representatives has requested an opinion on the constitutionality of H. B. 57, 57th Legis- lature, which would amend Article 680 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Texas, 1925, so as to make Article 680, C. C. P. read as follows: "In felony cases the courtmay direct that one (1) or two (2) jurors in addition to the regular jury be called and impane
- DM-0072: Whether the Dallas City Council may control the use of funds confiscated pursuant to the asset forfeiture law
A research copy. The official text is the Legislature's (statutes), the Secretary of State's (Texas Administrative Code) or eCFR's (federal rules). Not legal advice.