Texas law on any date › Attorney General opinions
Attorney General Opinion WW-1517
Issued December 28, 1962
Re: Whether under the facts submitted, a corpora- tion chartered by an association of teachers should pay the franchise tax required by Chapter 12, Title 122A, Taxation-
Cites: CV §1, CV §2, CV §3, CV §indicate, CV §4, CV §5
The Attorney General's page · official PDF
December 28, 1962
Honorable Robert S. Calvert
Opinion No. WW-1517
Comptroller of Public Accounts
Austin, Texas
Re: Whether under the facts
submitted, a corpora-
tion chartered by an
association of teachers
should pay the franchise
tax required by Chapter
12, Title 122A, Taxation-
Dear Mr. Calvert:
General, V.C.S.
You have requested the opinion of this office concern-
ing the liability for payment of franchise tax of a corpora-
tion chartered by an association of teachers,
Your request
included the purpose clause of this corporation, which is as
follows:
"Section 1. To cooperate with the Texas
State Teachers Association and the National
Education Association in the promotion within
the teaching group of the highest type of pro-
fessional practices; to encourage active partici-
pation of all teachers in the solution of school
problems; to encourage every member to be a pro-
gressive student of education; and to arouse
allegiance to a genuine code of professional
ethics.
"Section 2. To encourage higher qualifi-
cations for entrance into the teaching~profession;
to guide well endowed young people to select
teaching as a life,work; to improve the~social
and economic,status of teachers; and to form a
representative body able to speak with,authority
for them.
"Section 3. To promote, encourage and
assist other local teacher organizations and to
promote cooperation among such organizations and
their members.
Honorable Robert S. Calvert, Page 2 (WW-1517)
"Section 4. To cooperate with parent-
teacher associations and other civic bodies
having educational objectives and to aid in
interpreting to the public the problems, the
functions, and the steady progress of the
public schools.
"Section 5. To encourage teachers to
exercise their rights and privileges as citizens
and to accept willingly leadership in civic
affairs."
We understand from your request that this corporation
was organized under the Texas Non-Profit Corporation Act,
Chapter 9, Title 32, Vernon's Civil Statutes.
There is no
provision exempting all such corporations from payment of
franchise tax.
Article 12.01, Taxation-General
V.C.S., as amended
Acts 1961, 57th Leg., p. 182, ch. 97, 81, provides that:
"(1) Except as herein provided, every
domestic and foreign cornoration heretofzor
hereafter chartered or authorized to
in Texas or doing business in Texas,
or before May 1st of each year, file
as are required by Article 12.08 and
in advance to the Secretary of State
tax for the year following. o ."
do business
shall, on
such reports
12.19 and pay
a franchise
Article 12.03, Taxation-General, V.C.S., lists a number
of exemptions from the franchise tax. Of the categories of
corporations qualifying for exemption, the closest to the
corporation in question are corporations organized for
"F-G=
educational.purposes, or for purely public charity,"
( mp asis added.)
Two fundamental principles,should be noted here.
As
pointed out in Attorney General's Opinion No. O-4137, wherein
a question similar to the present one was discussed, "It is
too fundamental to require the citation of authorities that
one~claiming an exemptions from the payment of taxes must
clearly come within the exemptions.therefrom provided by the
law." The rule that in determining the~effect of a statute,
every word is presumed,to have a purpose and each word should
be given effect, was clearly stated in Eddins-Walcher Butane
co. V. Calvert, 156 Tex. 587, 298 S.W.2d 93 (1957).
Honorable Robert S. Calvert, Page 3 (ww-1517)
Giving effect to the words "strictly" and "purely" as
used in Article 12.03, it is apparent from the above purpose
clause that the corporation in question will not come within
the exemptions set out in that Article.
Section 1 of the purpose clause is clearly a professional
purpose, designed to improve the quality of the teaching pro-
fession.
Section 2 is much the same, but provides for improv-
ing the "social and economic status of teachers" and for form-
ing "a representative body able to speak with authority for
them." These sections, together with Section 3, indicate a
purpose and function of the corporation not significantly
different from those of other professional and trade associa-
tions, i.e., to better the social and economic conditions of
their members.
Section 4 is, by itself, more nearly an educational
purpose, and Section 5 suggests the encouragement of general
civil responsibility among teachers.
While teachers are educators and are employed primarily
to educate, the purpose clause of the corporation considered
here reveals that the corporation itself was not organized for
%;~;C;;,
educational purposes, or for
e corporation does not qualify
franchise tax.
SUMMARY
Under the submitted facts, a corporation organized
by an association of teachers, the purpose of which
is neither strictly educational nor purely public
charity, is not exempt from payment of the corpora-
tion franchise tax.
Yours very truly,
WILL WILSON
Attorney General of Texas
w-s
Assistant Attorniy &&era1
JAP:ca
Honorable Robert S. Calvert, Page I, ww-1517)
APPROVED:
OPINION COMMITTEE
W. V. Geppert, Chairman
Norman Suarez
W. 0. Shultz
Cecil Rostch
REVIEWED FOR THE'ATTORNEY GENERAL
BY
Leonard Passmore
Attorney General opinions are persuasive, not binding on courts, and answer questions of law, not fact. Text extracted from the official PDF. Not legal advice.