Nonpartisan public records for Texas special districts Resident sign in
Texas Open Books

Texas law on any date › Attorney General opinions

Attorney General Opinion WW-1337

Re: Authority of the Insurance Department to issue original or renewal local agents' licenses to firms or partner- ships composed partly of individuals who do not qualify by examination as local recording agents and who are not actively engaged

Cites: IN §3, IN §4, IN §5, IN §6, IN §Section, IN §to, IN §evinces, IN §was

The Attorney General's page · official PDF

Hon. William A. Harrison Opinion No. W-1337 Commissioner of Insurance Austin, Texas Re: Authority of the Insurance Department to issue original or renewal local agents' licenses to firms or partner- ships composed partly of individuals who do not qualify by examination as local recording agents and who are not actively engaged Dear Mr. Harrison: In writing insurance. You have requested that this office render Its opinion on the following questions which we quote from your letter: "1. Is this Department authorized to Issue either an original or renewal of local recording agent's license to a firm or partnership if such firm or partnership is compos.ed partly of indi- viduals who qualify as local recording agents and partly of individuals who do not qualify and who are not active in the writing of insurance bus- iness? In answering this question, assume that all of the persons interested in such firm are partners. "2. If your answer to question No. 1 is in the negative, is this Department authorized to issue either an original or renewal of local recording agent's license to a firm or partnership if such firm or partnership is composed partly of individuals who qualify as local recording agents and partly of individuals who have an interest &in the profits of such firm and have no voice or authority in the operation of such firm? (i.e. the surviving widow of a partner with such widow's interest limited by the partnership agreement to an interest only in the profits of the firm with the surviving P artners to have full authority in its 03eration. L Hon. William A. Harrison, page 2 (WW- 1337) "3 . If your answer to question No. 1 or question No. 2 is in the affirmative, I request your opinion as to whether or not this Department should require all persons named in the license to meet the require- ments of Section 6 of Article 21.14 (pertaining to written examination) before issuing such license." These questions are directed specifically to the provisions of Article 21.14 of the Texas Insurance Code, the relevant portions of which read as follows: 11 . . . "Sec. 3. Application for License; To Whom License Ma.y be Issued; Corporations Not to Be Licensed.--When any persoh or firm shall desire to engage in business as a local recording agent for an insurance company or insurance carrier, he shall make application for a license to the Board of Insurance Commissioners, In such form as the Board may require, which application shall require a signed endorsement by General or State or Special Agent of a qualified insurance company or insur- ance carrier that applicant is a resident of Texas, trustworthy, of good character and good reputation, and is worthy of a.license. The Board is authorized to issue licenses to firms or to individuals engaging as partners in the insurance business, provided the names of all persons interested in such firm are named in the license, and each named as active in the business of the partnership qualify, and it be established that none not active have interest in partnership principally to have written and be compensated therefor for insurance on property controlled through ownership, mortgage or sale, family relationship, or employment; and provided further, that all licnesed agents must be residents of Texas. . . .The Board shall not issue a license to a corporation. "Sec. 4. Acting Without License Forbidden.-- It shall be unlawful for any person or firm or partnership to act as a local recording agent or solicitor in procuring business for any insurance company, corporation, interinsurance exchange, mutual, reciprocal, association, Lloyds or other insurance carrier, until he shall have in force Hon. William A. Harrison, Page 3 (m-1337) the license provided for herein. “Sec. 5. Active Agents or Solicitors Only to Be Licensed .--No license shall be granted to any person, firm or partnership, either as a local recording agent or solicitor, for the purpose of writing any fprm of insurance, unless it is found by the Board of Insurance Commissioners that such person or firm is, or intends to be, actively engaged In the soliciting or writing or Insurance from the public generally; that each person or individual of a firm Is a resident of Texas, of good character and good reputation, worthy of a license, and is to be actively engaged In good faith In the business of insurance, and that application Is not being made in order to evade the laws against rebating and discrimination either for the applicant or for some other . Nothing herein contained shall prohibit ~~?~~suring his own property or properties in which he has an Interest; but It Is the Intent of this section to prohibit coercion of insurance and to preserve to each citizen the right to choose his own agent or insurance carrier, and to prohibit the licensing of an Individual or firm to engage in the insurance business principally to handle business which he controls only through ownership, mortgage or sale, family relationship or employment, , , . "Sec. 6. Examination Required; Exceptions.-- If applicant for a local recording agent's license has not prior to date of such application, been licensed as a local recording agent, or if the applicant for a solicitor's license has not been licensed as a local recording agent or as a solicitor prior to date of such application, the Board of Insurance Commissioners shall require such applicant to submit to a written examination covering all kinds of insurance or contracts, which license If granted, will permit the anplicant to solicit. Any applicant for local recording agent's license who has prior to the date of such application been licensed as a local recording agent, shall be entitled to a local recording agent's license without examination, provided the other requirements of this article are met. Any applicant for solicitor's Hon. William A. Harrison, Page 4 (WW-1337) license who has been licensed as a local recording agent or as a solicitor prior to date of such application, shall be entitled to a solicitor's license without an examination, provided the other requirements of this article are met." In considering your first question, we are faced at the outset with what appears to be a basic repugnancy in the provisions of Section 3 and Section 5. The language of Section 3 clearly contemplates and,authorizes that under certain conditions, a firm or partnership be licensed as a local recording agent and that such firm or partnerhsip may consist of persons interested in the firm or partnership who are not active In the business of the firm or partnership. Section 5 seemingly nullifies this aspect of Section 3 by providing that before a license be granted to any person, firm or partnership, the Board of Insurance Commissioners must find that". . . such person or firm is, or intends to be, actively engaged in the soliciting or writing of insurance from the public generally; that each person or individual of a firm is a resident of Texas, of good character and good reputation, worthy of a license, and is to be actively engaged in good faith in the business of insurance, . . .'I In order to give the just quoted phrase of Section 5 the effect of nullifying the authority granted by Section 3 to license firms or partnerships with Inactive partners, we must attribute to the Legislature what we consider to be a wholly frivolous and mischievous intent to make a grant of authority in one section of an act and take away this authority in a subsequent section of the same act. We are neither disposed to Impute such purpose to the Legislature nor are we permitted by the rules of statutory construction to strike down one section as conflicting with another when there is some other construction which can be given the sections in question whereby they may be harmonized and both allowed to operate. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Howth, 116 Tex. 434 293 S.W. HO0 (1927) Brown v. Chancellor, bl Tex. 437 (1864);,Hanrick v. Haniick, 54 Tex. 101 (1880). In harmonizing the provisions of Section 3 and Section 5 it is significant to note that the Board's authority, under Section 3, to grant a license to a firm or parternship which consists of active and inactive members is, among other things, predicated upon the condition that '. each named as active in the business of the partnership qua&y, and it be established that none not active have interest in parternship principally to have written and be compensated therefor for insurance on 5696 hon. William A. Harrison, page 5 (w-1337) :yxg,erty controlled throtigh cwnership, mortgage or sale, family relationship, or emF:,oyment; . . .' This specific provision, together with the general language cf Section 3, evinces the 'ntention of the Legisiature to differentiate between the members of a f?rm or partnership which applies for a license and provide different standards for the active and inactive partner. ,Tkie active par?.ners on the one hand are specifically reqMred to "qualify", this means tha.t they must meet the same standards as any indlvldual applicant who is not connected with a firm or partnershlp. On the other hand, the members of the firm or partnership who are not active are merely required to be named in the firm or partnership license and it must be established that none of the inactive partners have an Interest :n t,he firm or partnership principally to have written and be compensated for insurance on controlled or owned property. In our oplnlon Section 3 s-,eclfies all of the quallflcatlons applicable to the inactive members of a firm or partnership and they are not subject to the provisions of Section 5 of Article 21.14 of the Texas Insurance Code. Section 5,was intended by the Legislature to apply to those who must "qualify" for a license, i.e. individual applicants for a license and those meminers of a firm or partnership who are active in the business of the firm or partnership. Therefore, your first question is answered In the affirmative and you are hereby advised that the Eoard does have the authority to issue a local recording agent's license to a firm or ~srtnership which consists of both active and inactive partners. In order that our holding in this respect be not misunderstood, we here point out that the inactive or active partners may not be limited partners and we hereby reaffirm our prior holdir:g to this effect In Attorney General's Opinions a-2453 (‘-‘3;1cJ] ;$:!d G-2453-A jljj&oj. S:nce we have answered your first question in the affirmative it IS unnecessary to answer your second question. In the ccurse of answering your first question, we have held t!-iat. it 5.s %he I;artners who ar'e active in the business of the fir;? or nartn+rshly who must qualify in the same manner as any applican?. for an individual Il.cense and that the inactive partners ar e reo.uired tic meet no qualifications other than those -imr!ose-d F,,v Secti j, ,zonsequently your tnird question is answered in‘thr: ne@~tl.i?e apd ;JOU are hereby advzsed that only those members of a. iirm c.r partnership who are active in the business Hon. William A. Harrison, page 6 (WW-1337) of the firm or partnership are required to comply with Section 6 of Article 21.14 of the Texas Insurance Code.' SUMMARY The Board of Insurance Commissioners is authorized to issue a local recording agent's license to a firm or partnership composed of active and inactive members, provided that neither the active or ln- active partners are limited partners; Sections 5 and 6 of Article 21.14 of the Texas Insurance Code apply to the active partners but do not apply to the inactive partners. Very truly yours, WILL WILSON Attorney General of Texas WOS: mkh APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE W. V. Geppert, Chairman Iola Wilcox Coleman Gay Howard Mays Irwin Salmonson REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: Houghton Brownlee, Jr.

Attorney General opinions are persuasive, not binding on courts, and answer questions of law, not fact. Text extracted from the official PDF. Not legal advice.