Texas law on any date › Attorney General opinions
Attorney General Opinion WW-1337
Re: Authority of the Insurance Department to issue original or renewal local agents' licenses to firms or partner- ships composed partly of individuals who do not qualify by examination as local recording agents and who are not actively engaged
Cites: IN §3, IN §4, IN §5, IN §6, IN §Section, IN §to, IN §evinces, IN §was
The Attorney General's page · official PDF
Hon. William A. Harrison
Opinion No. W-1337
Commissioner of Insurance
Austin, Texas
Re: Authority of the Insurance
Department to issue original
or renewal local agents'
licenses to firms or partner-
ships composed partly of
individuals who do not
qualify by examination as
local recording agents and
who are not actively engaged
Dear Mr. Harrison:
In writing insurance.
You have requested that this office render Its opinion
on the following questions which we quote from your letter:
"1. Is this Department authorized to Issue
either an original or renewal of local recording
agent's license to a firm or partnership if such
firm or partnership is compos.ed partly of indi-
viduals who qualify as local recording agents and
partly of individuals who do not qualify and who
are not active in the writing of insurance bus-
iness? In answering this question, assume that
all of the persons interested in such firm are
partners.
"2. If your answer to question No. 1 is in
the negative, is this Department authorized to
issue either an original or renewal of local
recording agent's license to a firm or partnership
if such firm or partnership is composed partly
of individuals who qualify as local recording
agents and partly of individuals who have an interest
&in
the profits of such firm and have no voice
or authority in the operation of such firm? (i.e.
the surviving widow of a partner with such widow's
interest limited by the partnership agreement to an
interest only in the profits of the firm with the
surviving
P
artners to have full authority in its
03eration.
L
Hon. William A. Harrison, page 2 (WW- 1337)
"3 . If your answer to question No. 1 or question
No. 2 is in the affirmative, I request your opinion
as to whether or not this Department should require
all persons named in the license to meet the require-
ments of Section 6 of Article 21.14 (pertaining to
written examination) before issuing such license."
These questions are directed specifically to the
provisions of Article 21.14 of the Texas Insurance Code, the
relevant portions of which read as follows:
11
. . .
"Sec. 3. Application for License; To Whom
License Ma.y be Issued; Corporations Not to Be
Licensed.--When any persoh or firm shall desire
to engage in business as a local recording agent
for an insurance company or insurance carrier, he
shall make application for a license to the Board
of Insurance Commissioners, In such form as the
Board may require, which application shall require
a signed endorsement by General or State or Special
Agent of a qualified insurance company or insur-
ance carrier that applicant is a resident of Texas,
trustworthy, of good character and good reputation,
and is worthy of a.license. The Board is authorized
to issue licenses to firms or to individuals engaging
as partners in the insurance business, provided
the names of all persons interested in such firm
are named in the license, and each named as active
in the business of the partnership qualify, and it
be established that none not active have interest
in partnership principally to have written and be
compensated therefor for insurance on property
controlled through ownership, mortgage or sale,
family relationship, or employment; and provided
further, that all licnesed agents must be residents
of Texas. . . .The Board shall not issue a license
to a corporation.
"Sec. 4. Acting Without License Forbidden.--
It shall be unlawful for any person or firm or
partnership to act as a local recording agent or
solicitor in procuring business for any insurance
company, corporation, interinsurance exchange,
mutual, reciprocal, association, Lloyds or other
insurance carrier, until he shall have in force
Hon. William A. Harrison, Page 3 (m-1337)
the license provided for herein.
“Sec. 5. Active Agents or Solicitors Only
to Be Licensed .--No license shall be granted to
any person, firm or partnership, either as a local
recording agent or solicitor, for the purpose of
writing any fprm of insurance, unless it is found
by the Board of Insurance Commissioners that such
person or firm is, or intends to be, actively
engaged In the soliciting or writing or Insurance
from the public generally; that each person or
individual of a firm Is a resident of Texas, of
good character and good reputation, worthy of a
license, and is to be actively engaged In good
faith In the business of insurance, and that
application Is not being made in order to evade
the laws against rebating and discrimination
either for the applicant or for some other
. Nothing herein contained shall prohibit
~~?~~suring his own property or properties in
which he has an Interest; but It Is the Intent
of this section to prohibit coercion of insurance
and to preserve to each citizen the right to
choose his own agent or insurance carrier, and
to prohibit the licensing of an Individual or firm
to engage in the insurance business principally to
handle business which he controls only through
ownership, mortgage or sale, family relationship
or employment, , , .
"Sec. 6. Examination Required; Exceptions.--
If applicant for a local recording agent's license
has not prior to date of such application, been
licensed as a local recording agent, or if the
applicant for a solicitor's license has not been
licensed as a local recording agent or as a solicitor
prior to date of such application, the Board of
Insurance Commissioners shall require such applicant
to submit to a written examination covering all
kinds of insurance or contracts, which license If
granted, will permit the anplicant to solicit. Any
applicant for local recording agent's license who
has prior to the date of such application been
licensed as a local recording agent, shall be
entitled to a local recording agent's license
without examination, provided the other requirements
of this article are met. Any applicant for solicitor's
Hon. William A. Harrison, Page 4 (WW-1337)
license who has been licensed as a local recording
agent or as a solicitor prior to date of such
application, shall be entitled to a solicitor's
license without an examination, provided the other
requirements of this article are met."
In considering your first question, we are faced at
the outset with what appears to be a basic repugnancy in the
provisions of Section 3 and Section 5. The language of Section
3 clearly contemplates and,authorizes that under certain
conditions, a firm or partnership be licensed as a local
recording agent and that such firm or partnerhsip may consist
of persons interested in the firm or partnership who are not
active In the business of the firm or partnership. Section 5
seemingly nullifies this aspect of Section 3 by providing that
before a license be granted to any person, firm or partnership,
the Board of Insurance Commissioners must find that". . .
such person or firm is, or intends to be, actively engaged in
the soliciting or writing of insurance from the public generally;
that each person or individual of a firm is a resident of Texas,
of good character and good reputation, worthy of a license, and
is to be actively engaged in good faith in the business of
insurance, . . .'I
In order to give the just
quoted phrase of Section 5
the effect of nullifying the authority granted by Section 3 to
license firms or partnerships with Inactive partners, we must
attribute to the Legislature what we consider to be a wholly
frivolous and mischievous intent to make a grant of authority
in one section of an act and take away this authority in a
subsequent section of the same act. We are neither disposed
to Impute such purpose to the Legislature nor are we permitted
by the rules of statutory construction to strike down one
section as conflicting with another when there is some other
construction which can be given the sections in question whereby
they may be harmonized and both allowed to operate. J. I. Case
Threshing Machine Co. v. Howth, 116 Tex.
434 293 S.W. HO0
(1927) Brown v. Chancellor, bl Tex. 437 (1864);,Hanrick
v. Haniick, 54 Tex. 101 (1880).
In harmonizing the provisions of Section 3 and Section
5 it is significant to note that the Board's authority, under
Section 3, to grant a license to a firm or parternship which
consists of active and inactive members is, among other things,
predicated upon the condition that '.
each named as active
in the business of the partnership qua&y,
and it be established
that none not active have interest in parternship principally
to have written and be compensated therefor for insurance on
5696
hon. William A. Harrison, page 5 (w-1337)
:yxg,erty controlled throtigh cwnership, mortgage or sale, family
relationship, or emF:,oyment; . . .' This specific provision,
together with the general language cf Section 3, evinces the
'ntention of the Legisiature to differentiate between the
members of a f?rm or partnership which applies for a license
and provide different standards for the active and inactive
partner. ,Tkie
active par?.ners on the one hand are specifically
reqMred to "qualify", this means tha.t they must meet the
same standards as any indlvldual applicant who is not connected
with a firm or partnershlp. On the other hand, the members of
the firm or partnership who are not active are merely required
to be named in the firm or partnership license and it must be
established that none of the inactive partners have an Interest
:n t,he firm or partnership principally to have written and be
compensated for insurance on controlled or owned property.
In our oplnlon Section 3 s-,eclfies all of the quallflcatlons
applicable to the inactive members of a firm or partnership
and they are not subject to the provisions of Section 5 of
Article 21.14 of the Texas Insurance Code.
Section 5,was intended by the Legislature to apply
to those who must "qualify" for a license, i.e. individual
applicants for a license and those meminers of a firm or
partnership who are active in the business of the firm or
partnership.
Therefore, your first question is answered In the
affirmative and you are hereby advised that the Eoard does
have the authority to issue a local recording agent's license
to a firm or ~srtnership which consists of both active and
inactive partners. In order that our holding in this respect
be not misunderstood, we here point out that the inactive or
active partners may not be limited partners and we hereby reaffirm
our prior holdir:g to this effect In Attorney General's Opinions
a-2453
(‘-‘3;1cJ] ;$:!d G-2453-A jljj&oj.
S:nce we have answered your first question in the
affirmative it IS unnecessary to answer your second question.
In the ccurse of answering your first question, we
have held t!-iat.
it 5.s %he I;artners who ar'e active in the business
of the fir;? or nartn+rshly who must qualify in the same manner
as any applican?. for an individual Il.cense and that the inactive
partners ar e reo.uired tic meet no qualifications other than those
-imr!ose-d
F,,v
Secti
j, ,zonsequently
your tnird question is answered
in‘thr: ne@~tl.i?e
apd ;JOU are hereby advzsed that only those
members of a. iirm c.r partnership who are active in the business
Hon. William A. Harrison, page 6 (WW-1337)
of the firm
or partnership are required to comply with Section 6
of Article 21.14 of the Texas Insurance Code.'
SUMMARY
The Board of Insurance Commissioners is authorized
to issue
a local recording agent's license to a
firm or partnership composed of active and inactive
members, provided that neither the active or ln-
active partners are limited partners; Sections 5
and 6 of Article 21.14 of the Texas Insurance Code
apply to the active partners but do not apply to
the inactive partners.
Very truly yours,
WILL WILSON
Attorney General of Texas
WOS: mkh
APPROVED:
OPINION COMMITTEE
W. V. Geppert, Chairman
Iola Wilcox
Coleman Gay
Howard Mays
Irwin Salmonson
REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
BY: Houghton Brownlee, Jr.
Attorney General opinions are persuasive, not binding on courts, and answer questions of law, not fact. Text extracted from the official PDF. Not legal advice.