Texas law on any date › Attorney General opinions
Attorney General Opinion WW-1305
Issued April 09, 1962
Re: Whether the Texas 1020 State Office Building Austin 1, Texas
Cites: PE §10, PE §11, PE §12, PE §13, PE §9
The Attorney General's page · official PDF
THE
ORNEY
GENERAL
OF-XAS
IVILL
WILSON
A-OR-
GENERA=.
April
9,
1962
Dr. R. G. Garrett
Executive
Director
Opinion
No. WW-1305
Texas Animal Health
Commission
Re:
Whether
the Texas
1020 State
Office
Building
Austin
1, Texas
Dear Dr.
Garrett:
Animal Health
Commission
can require
slaughter
poultry
being
shipped
into
Texas
to be consigned
to slaughtering
estab-
lishments
maintaining
Federal
veterinary
post-
mortem inspection.
We are in receipt
of your
is
stated
as follows:
request
for
opinion
which
"Specifically,
an opinion
is desired
as to
whether
or not this
Commission
can require
that
all
slaughter
poultry
being
shipped
into
this
State
be consigned
to slaughtering
establishments
maintaining
Federal
veterinary
post-mortem
in-
spection.
Present
regulations
do not place
any
restrictions
on the movement of
slaughter
poultry
into
Texas."
An inspection
of Article
152513, Vernon's
Penal Code
reveals
that
Sections
10,
11,
12 and 13 govern
the shipping
of
"livestock,
cattle
and hogs"
into
Texas.
Article
1505a of the Penal
Code states
in part
as
follows:
11 . . .
"(b)
The term "livestock"
means, and shall
include
any bovine,
equine,
caprine,
ovine
or
porcine
animal.
. . .'
The above
definition
of
“livestock”
and the use of
the word “cattle”
leads
us to the conclusion
that
“poultry”
may not properly
be considered
livestock
or cattle,
and that
therefore
the provisions
of
Sections
10,
11,
12 and 13 do not
apply
to poultry.
Dr. R. G. Garrett,
page 2 (WV!-1305)
Code
However,
Section
9 of Article
152513 of
the Penal
states
as follows:
“Sec.
9.
It
shall
be unlawful
for
any
person,
firm
or corporation
to ship,
drive,
drift,
haul,
lead
or otherwise
move
from
any state,
territory
or foreign
country
into
any county
in the State
of Texas,
or for
any railroad
company or other
common carrier
to haul,
ship,
or transport
into
any county
in the State
of Texas from any state,
territory,
or foreign
country,
any rattle
[except
steers
and spayed
heifers),
horses,
mules,
asses,
sheep,
goats,
hogs,
domestic
animals
or domestic
fowls,
except
as hereinafter
provided,
unless
the same
are accompanied
by a health
certificate
issued
by a veterinarian
authorized
by or recognized
by
%he Texas Animal Health
Commission
on a health
certificate
form prescribed
In the rules
and
regulations
of
said
Commission.
The said
Commission
shall
provide
In its
rules
and reg-
ulations
for
authorizing
and recognizing
vet-
erinarians
of this
state
and of other
states
and Departments
of
the United
States
Government
and no veterinarian
shall
be considered
as rec-
ognized
or authorized
bu said
Commission.
extent
move into-the
State
of Texas,
or any railway
or
other
common carrier
that
shall
haul,
ship,
or
transport
into
the State
of Texas
any cattle
(except
steers
and spayed
heifers
I,
horses,
mules,
asses,
sheep,
goats,
hogs,
domestic
animals
or
domestic
fowls,
in violation
hereof
without
the
same being
accompanied
by said
certificate
shall
be deemed guilty
of a misdemeanor,
and upon con-
viction
thereof
shall
be fined
any sum of not
less
Dr. R. G. Garrett,
page 3~ (WW-1305)
than Twenty-five
Dollars
25.00)
nor more
than One Hundred Dollars
100.00)
for
each
head of
livestock
and for
each domestic
animal
or domestic
fowl
which
said
person,
firm
or corporation,
railway
or other
common
carrier
ships,
hauls,
drives,
drifts,
trans-
oorts.
leads.
or otherwise
moves into
the
State-of
Texas,
in violation
hereof.
Cattle
We note
from the above
Article
that
all
animals
there
enumerated
including
"domestic
fowls,"
which
are
shipped
into
Texas must be subject
to a health
certificate
on a form
"prescribed
in the rules
and regulations
of
said
Commission."
The form of
the certificate
is
to be left
to the discretion
of
the Commission,
except
that
it
must show "that
said
livestock,
domestic
animals,
and domestic
fowls
were inspected
by said
veterinarian
sometime
within
the preceding
ten days
before
they
entered
the State
of
Texas.
and that
he found
them to be-free
of all
infectious
and contagious
diseases,
as such are determined
by the Texas Animal Health
Commission
to be dangerous
to livestock,
and that
said
animals
were
subjected
to such tests,
immunizations,
and treatment
as
required
under
regulations
adopted
by said
Commission,"
among
other
requirements.
(Emphasis
added).
We feel
from the legislative
intent
as expressed
in
Section
9 that
since
the Texas Animal Health
Commission
may
by its
rules
and regulations
prescribe
a certain
health
certi-
ficate
which
form must be executed
before
foreign
poultry
may
enter
Texas,
that
it
also
has the authority
to promulgate
any
rules
or regulations
pertaining
to the tests,
immunizations,
and treatment
of poultry
coming
into
Texas
for
slaughtering.
The last
sentence
of Section
9 in excluding
cattle,
sheep,
and hogs
brought
into
Texas for
slaughter
purposes
from certi-
fication
evidences
to us that
the Commission
was to require
certification,
under
rules
prescribed
by them,
for
all
other
animals
to be slaughtered
if
they
saw fit.
Authority
is
lacking,
however
for
the Commission
to
require
that
all
poultry
shipped
into
Texas be consigned
to
particular
establishments
maintaining
certain
standards.
The
Legislature
has not given
this
power to the Commission,
and we
cannot
infer
same from Section
9 which
concerns
health
certi-
ficates
only.
.
.
Dr. R. G. Garrett,
page 4 (WW-1305)
SUMMARY
The Texas Animal Health
Commission
may not require
that
all
poultry
shipped
into
Texas be consigned
only
to slaughtering
establishments
maintaining
Federal
post-mortem
inspection.
Any control
over
poultry
comes from Section
9 of Article
1525b of
Vernon's
Penal Code which
gives
the Commission
authority
to require
a special
health
certificate
under rules
and regulations
of
the Commission
for
all
poultry
shipped
into
Texas for
slaughtering.
Yours very
truly,
FDW:jkr:mkh
APPROVED:
OPINION COMMITTEE
W. V. Geppert,
Chairman
Joseph
Trimble
Charles
Lind
Malcolm
Quick
WILL WILSON
REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
BY:
Houghton Brownlee,
Jr.
Attorney General opinions are persuasive, not binding on courts, and answer questions of law, not fact. Text extracted from the official PDF. Not legal advice.