Texas law on any date › Attorney General opinions
Attorney General Opinion KP-0424
Issued July 07, 2022 · request RQ0466KP
Re: Whether a corporate entity may serve as a substitute trustee for purposes of conducting a mortgage foreclosure sale under Property Code chapter 51
Cites: PR §51.0001, PR §51.016, GV §311.005, GV §311.001, PR §1.002, PR §111.004
The Attorney General's page · official PDF
KEN PAXTON
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
February 6, 2023
The Honorable Donna Campbell, M.D.
Chair, Senate Committee on Nominations
Texas State Senate
Post Office Box 12068
Austin, Texas 78711-2068
Opinion No. KP-0424
Re: Whether a corporate entity may serve as a substitute trustee for purposes of conducting
a mortgage foreclosure sale under Property Code chapter 51 (RQ-0466-KP)
Dear Senator Campbell:
You ask whether a corporate entity may serve as a substitute trustee for the purpose of
conducting a mortgage foreclosure sale under Property Code chapter 51.1 You explain that
confusion exists on the question whether a person acting as a substitute trustee under that chapter
may be a legal entity or if a substitute trustee must be a natural person, i.e., an individual human
being. See Request Letter at 1–2.
Property Code chapter 51 provides the law governing enforcement of a deed of trust which
creates a lien against real property. See generally TEX. PROP. CODE §§ 51.0001–.016.
Subsection 51.0001(8) identifies the trustee as the person who is authorized to “exercise the power
of a sale under the terms of a security instrument . . . .” Id. § 51.0001(8); see also id. §§ 51.0001(6)
(defining “security instrument” to mean “a deed of trust, mortgage, or other contract lien on an
interest in real property”), 51.0074(a) (providing that “[o]ne or more persons may be authorized
to exercise the power of sale under a security instrument”). Subsection 51.0001(7) defines a
“[s]ubstitute trustee” as “a person appointed by the current mortgagee or mortgage servicer under
the terms of the security instrument to exercise the power of sale.” Id. § 51.0001(7) (emphasis
added). As you point out, chapter 51 does not define “person.” See generally id.; see also Request
Letter at 1.
Chapter 311, Government Code, provides definitions of common terms that “apply unless
the statute or context . . . requires a different definition[.]” TEX. GOV’T CODE § 311.005. It defines
“person” to include a “corporation, organization, government or governmental subdivision or
1See Letter from Honorable Donna Campbell, M.D., Chair, Comm. on Veterans Affairs & Border Sec., Tex.
State Senate, to Honorable Ken Paxton, Tex. Att’y Gen. at 1 (July 7, 2022), https://texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/
default/files/request-files/request/2022/RQ0466KP.pdf (“Request Letter”).
The Honorable Donna Campbell, M.D. - Page 2
agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association, and any other legal entity.” Id.
§ 311.005(2); see also id. § 311.001 (identifying chapter 311 as the “Code Construction Act”). The
Property Code states that the Code Construction Act applies to the construction of provisions in
the Property Code except as otherwise expressly provided by the Property Code. TEX. PROP. CODE
§ 1.002 No language in chapter 51 limits the term “person” to only a human individual. Moreover,
other provisions elsewhere in the Property Code define the word “person” broadly to include
corporate and legal entities. See, e.g., id. §§ 111.004(10) (defining “person” for purposes of the
Texas Trust Code to include different types of corporate and legal entities), 163.003(6) (defining
“person” for purposes of the management of institutional funds to include different types of
corporate and legal entities), 301.003(12) (defining “person” for purposes of the Texas Fair
Housing Act to include different types of corporate and legal entities). A court would likely utilize
Government Code chapter 311’s definition of “person” to define the term for purposes of
chapter 51 of the Property Code.
You refer us to a 2013 bankruptcy court case as support for this interpretation.2 See Request
Letter at 2. In In re AMRCO, Inc., the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District,
Austin Division, looked at the precise question at issue: whether only natural persons can be
appointed as trustee or substitute trustee in a foreclosure sale. See 496 B.R. 442, 445 (W.D. Tex.
2013). The court noted the case law makes clear that corporations are “persons” who may serve as
a “mortgage servicer” or “mortgagee” as those terms are defined and used in section 51.0001. Id.
(citing Jones v. Deutsche Bank Nat. Trust Co., No. 3:12-CV-3929-L, 2013 WL 3455716, at *8
(N.D. Tex. July 9, 2013)); see also TEX. PROP. CODE § 51.0001(3) (defining “mortgage servicer”),
(4) (defining “mortgagee”). The court observed that to construe chapter 51 to allow an artificial
person to serve as a mortgage servicer or mortgagee under subsections 51.0001(3) and (4), but not
allow an artificial person to serve as a trustee or substitute trustee under subsections 51.0001(7)
and (8) violates “the established canon of construction that similar language contained within the
same section of a statute must be accorded a consistent meaning.” In re AMRCO, Inc., 496 B.R. at
445 (quoting Nat’l Credit Union Admin. v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co., 522 U.S. 479, 481 (1998)).
The court concluded that an artificial person may “serve as Trustee or Substitute Trustee.” Id.; see
also Pate v. Zientz, No. 4-09-CV-643, 2011 WL 1576943, at *5 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 9, 2011) (holding
that Deutsche Bank, a corporate entity, validly acted as a trustee under a deed of trust).
For these reasons, a court would likely conclude that a corporate entity is a “person” and
thus may serve as a substitute trustee for purposes of conducting a mortgage foreclosure sale under
Property Code chapter 51.3
2State courts find federal authority particularly persuasive in home-mortgage litigation. See, e.g., Schuetz v.
Source One Mortg. Servs. Corp., No. 03-15-00522-CV, 2016 WL 4628048, at *3, n.3 (Tex. App.—Austin
Sept. 1, 2016, no pet.); Standiford v. CitiMortgage, Inc., No. 03-14-00344-CV, 2015 WL 6831578, at *3, n.7 (Tex.
App.—Austin Nov. 3, 2015, pet. denied).
3Though you ask specifically about only a “substitute trustee,” the analysis would be the same for a trustee.
See generally Request Letter at 1–2.
f
.
'
:8
The Honorable Donna Campbell, M.D. - Page 3
S U M M A R Y
Property Code chapter 51 relates to liens created against real
property as enforcement of a deed of trust. It authorizes a trustee or
a substitute trustee to conduct a foreclosure sale and defines both
using the term “person.” Absent limitation in chapter 51 and
utilizing the general definition of “person” from the Code
Construction Act, a court would likely conclude that a corporate
entity is a “person” and thus may serve as a substitute trustee for
purposes of conducting a mortgage foreclosure sale under Property
Code chapter 51.
Very truly yours,
K E N P A X T O N
Attorney General of Texas
BRENT E. WEBSTER
First Assistant Attorney General
LESLEY FRENCH
Chief of Staff
D. FORREST BRUMBAUGH
Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel
AUSTIN KINGHORN
Chair, Opinion Committee
CHARLOTTE M. HARPER
Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee
Attorney General opinions are persuasive, not binding on courts, and answer questions of law, not fact. Text extracted from the official PDF. Not legal advice.