Nonpartisan public records for Texas special districts Resident sign in
Texas Open Books

Texas law on any date › Attorney General opinions

Attorney General Opinion KP-0424

Issued July 07, 2022 · request RQ0466KP

Re: Whether a corporate entity may serve as a substitute trustee for purposes of conducting a mortgage foreclosure sale under Property Code chapter 51

Cites: PR §51.0001, PR §51.016, GV §311.005, GV §311.001, PR §1.002, PR §111.004

The Attorney General's page · official PDF

KEN PAXTON ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS February 6, 2023 The Honorable Donna Campbell, M.D. Chair, Senate Committee on Nominations Texas State Senate Post Office Box 12068 Austin, Texas 78711-2068 Opinion No. KP-0424 Re: Whether a corporate entity may serve as a substitute trustee for purposes of conducting a mortgage foreclosure sale under Property Code chapter 51 (RQ-0466-KP) Dear Senator Campbell: You ask whether a corporate entity may serve as a substitute trustee for the purpose of conducting a mortgage foreclosure sale under Property Code chapter 51.1 You explain that confusion exists on the question whether a person acting as a substitute trustee under that chapter may be a legal entity or if a substitute trustee must be a natural person, i.e., an individual human being. See Request Letter at 1–2. Property Code chapter 51 provides the law governing enforcement of a deed of trust which creates a lien against real property. See generally TEX. PROP. CODE §§ 51.0001–.016. Subsection 51.0001(8) identifies the trustee as the person who is authorized to “exercise the power of a sale under the terms of a security instrument . . . .” Id. § 51.0001(8); see also id. §§ 51.0001(6) (defining “security instrument” to mean “a deed of trust, mortgage, or other contract lien on an interest in real property”), 51.0074(a) (providing that “[o]ne or more persons may be authorized to exercise the power of sale under a security instrument”). Subsection 51.0001(7) defines a “[s]ubstitute trustee” as “a person appointed by the current mortgagee or mortgage servicer under the terms of the security instrument to exercise the power of sale.” Id. § 51.0001(7) (emphasis added). As you point out, chapter 51 does not define “person.” See generally id.; see also Request Letter at 1. Chapter 311, Government Code, provides definitions of common terms that “apply unless the statute or context . . . requires a different definition[.]” TEX. GOV’T CODE § 311.005. It defines “person” to include a “corporation, organization, government or governmental subdivision or 1See Letter from Honorable Donna Campbell, M.D., Chair, Comm. on Veterans Affairs & Border Sec., Tex. State Senate, to Honorable Ken Paxton, Tex. Att’y Gen. at 1 (July 7, 2022), https://texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/ default/files/request-files/request/2022/RQ0466KP.pdf (“Request Letter”). The Honorable Donna Campbell, M.D. - Page 2 agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association, and any other legal entity.” Id. § 311.005(2); see also id. § 311.001 (identifying chapter 311 as the “Code Construction Act”). The Property Code states that the Code Construction Act applies to the construction of provisions in the Property Code except as otherwise expressly provided by the Property Code. TEX. PROP. CODE § 1.002 No language in chapter 51 limits the term “person” to only a human individual. Moreover, other provisions elsewhere in the Property Code define the word “person” broadly to include corporate and legal entities. See, e.g., id. §§ 111.004(10) (defining “person” for purposes of the Texas Trust Code to include different types of corporate and legal entities), 163.003(6) (defining “person” for purposes of the management of institutional funds to include different types of corporate and legal entities), 301.003(12) (defining “person” for purposes of the Texas Fair Housing Act to include different types of corporate and legal entities). A court would likely utilize Government Code chapter 311’s definition of “person” to define the term for purposes of chapter 51 of the Property Code. You refer us to a 2013 bankruptcy court case as support for this interpretation.2 See Request Letter at 2. In In re AMRCO, Inc., the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District, Austin Division, looked at the precise question at issue: whether only natural persons can be appointed as trustee or substitute trustee in a foreclosure sale. See 496 B.R. 442, 445 (W.D. Tex. 2013). The court noted the case law makes clear that corporations are “persons” who may serve as a “mortgage servicer” or “mortgagee” as those terms are defined and used in section 51.0001. Id. (citing Jones v. Deutsche Bank Nat. Trust Co., No. 3:12-CV-3929-L, 2013 WL 3455716, at *8 (N.D. Tex. July 9, 2013)); see also TEX. PROP. CODE § 51.0001(3) (defining “mortgage servicer”), (4) (defining “mortgagee”). The court observed that to construe chapter 51 to allow an artificial person to serve as a mortgage servicer or mortgagee under subsections 51.0001(3) and (4), but not allow an artificial person to serve as a trustee or substitute trustee under subsections 51.0001(7) and (8) violates “the established canon of construction that similar language contained within the same section of a statute must be accorded a consistent meaning.” In re AMRCO, Inc., 496 B.R. at 445 (quoting Nat’l Credit Union Admin. v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co., 522 U.S. 479, 481 (1998)). The court concluded that an artificial person may “serve as Trustee or Substitute Trustee.” Id.; see also Pate v. Zientz, No. 4-09-CV-643, 2011 WL 1576943, at *5 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 9, 2011) (holding that Deutsche Bank, a corporate entity, validly acted as a trustee under a deed of trust). For these reasons, a court would likely conclude that a corporate entity is a “person” and thus may serve as a substitute trustee for purposes of conducting a mortgage foreclosure sale under Property Code chapter 51.3 2State courts find federal authority particularly persuasive in home-mortgage litigation. See, e.g., Schuetz v. Source One Mortg. Servs. Corp., No. 03-15-00522-CV, 2016 WL 4628048, at *3, n.3 (Tex. App.—Austin Sept. 1, 2016, no pet.); Standiford v. CitiMortgage, Inc., No. 03-14-00344-CV, 2015 WL 6831578, at *3, n.7 (Tex. App.—Austin Nov. 3, 2015, pet. denied). 3Though you ask specifically about only a “substitute trustee,” the analysis would be the same for a trustee. See generally Request Letter at 1–2. f . ' :8 The Honorable Donna Campbell, M.D. - Page 3 S U M M A R Y Property Code chapter 51 relates to liens created against real property as enforcement of a deed of trust. It authorizes a trustee or a substitute trustee to conduct a foreclosure sale and defines both using the term “person.” Absent limitation in chapter 51 and utilizing the general definition of “person” from the Code Construction Act, a court would likely conclude that a corporate entity is a “person” and thus may serve as a substitute trustee for purposes of conducting a mortgage foreclosure sale under Property Code chapter 51. Very truly yours, K E N P A X T O N Attorney General of Texas BRENT E. WEBSTER First Assistant Attorney General LESLEY FRENCH Chief of Staff D. FORREST BRUMBAUGH Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel AUSTIN KINGHORN Chair, Opinion Committee CHARLOTTE M. HARPER Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee

Attorney General opinions are persuasive, not binding on courts, and answer questions of law, not fact. Text extracted from the official PDF. Not legal advice.