Texas law on any date › Attorney General opinions
Attorney General Opinion KP-0419
Issued January 11, 2022 · request RQ0444KP
Re: Whether a merchant may offer a theft deterrent course in lieu of arrest and prosecution and whether doing so would expose a merchant or educational provider to civil or criminal liability
Cites: CP §124.001, PE §31.02, PE §31.03, PE §134.005, PE §124.001
The Attorney General's page · official PDF
October 18, 2022
The Honorable DeWayne Burns
Chair, House Committee on Agriculture and Livestock
Texas House of Representatives
Post Office Box 2910
Austin, Texas 78768-2910
Opinion No. KP-0419
Re: Whether a merchant may offer a theft deterrent course in lieu of arrest and prosecution
and whether doing so would expose a merchant or educational provider to civil or criminal
liability (RQ-0444-KP)
Dear Representative Burns:
Section 124.001 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code, known as the shopkeeper’s
privilege, gives merchants a limited privilege to detain a person suspected of shoplifting. See TEX.
CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 124.001. You tell us that theft deterrent “[p]rograms similar to
defensive driving courses . . . are being offered by merchants as a way to help free up time and
resources” of the merchant, law enforcement, and the courts that would otherwise have been spent
pursuing shoplifting charges.1 You ask “whether a merchant, operating under the authority of
Section 124.001 . . . may offer a theft deterrent course in lieu of arrest and prosecution . . . .”
Request Letter at 2.
Background
The Penal Code classifies shoplifting as a species of theft. See TEX. PENAL CODE § 31.02
(consolidating theft offenses). The seriousness of the offense depends in large part on the value
of the item taken, ranging from a Class B misdemeanor when the value of the property stolen is
less than $100, to various degrees of felonies when the value is $2,500 or more. See id. § 31.03(e).
A merchant who is a victim of shoplifting may sue the perpetrator for actual and special damages,
costs, and attorney’s fees. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 134.005. Strictly speaking, the
State, not the merchant, decides whether to arrest and prosecute a person suspected of shoplifting.
See Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. Carr, 309 S.W.3d 174, 178 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2010, pet.
denied) (“If, how, and when to arrest a suspect is within a police officer’s discretion.”) (citation
1See Letter from Honorable DeWayne Burns, Chair, House Comm. on Ag. & Livestock, to Honorable Ken
Paxton, Tex. Att’y Gen. at 2 (Jan. 11, 2022), https://texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/request-files/request
/2022/RQ0444KP.pdf (“Request Letter”).
The Honorable DeWayne Burns- Page 2
omitted); Neal v. State, 150 S.W.3d 169, 173 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004) (stating “prosecutors have
broad discretion in deciding which cases to prosecute”).
Shopkeeper’s privilege
You ask specifically about the authority granted by the shopkeeper’s privilege in section
124.001. Request Letter at 2. The shopkeeper’s privilege to investigate theft provides: “A person
who reasonably believes that another has stolen or is attempting to steal property is privileged to
detain that person in a reasonable manner and for a reasonable time to investigate ownership of the
property.” TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 124.001 (emphasis added). The only stated purpose
of the privilege is “to investigate ownership of the property.” Id. The statute does not specifically
address detentions to offer an educational theft deterrent program. See id.
That said, a merchant has the discretion to refrain from reporting shoplifting to law
enforcement, as no duty to report a crime exists at common law. See San Benito Bank & Tr. Co.
v. Landair Travels, 31 S.W.3d 312, 322 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2000, no pet.). Also, a
merchant’s threat to call the police, without more, is likely lawful. See Fojtik v. Charter Med.
Corp., 985 S.W.2d 625, 629 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1999, pet. denied) (“Threats to call the
police are not ordinarily sufficient in themselves to effect an unlawful imprisonment.”) (citations
omitted). Thus, the decision whether to refer the matter to law enforcement belongs to the
merchant. We find no Texas law that prohibits a merchant from offering a person suspected of
shoplifting the option of participating in a theft deterrent program in lieu of referring the matter to
law enforcement.
The Honorable DeWayne Burns- Page 3
S U M M A R Y
The shopkeeper’s privilege in section 124.001 of the Civil
Practice and Remedies Code authorizes a merchant to detain a
person suspected of shoplifting to investigate ownership of the
property. While that statute does not supply authority for a merchant
to offer a theft deterrent course in lieu of referral to law enforcement
for arrest and prosecution, we find no other Texas law that
specifically prohibits such a practice.
Very truly yours,
K E N P A X T O N
Attorney General of Texas
BRENT E. WEBSTER
First Assistant Attorney General
LESLEY FRENCH
Chief of Staff
D. FORREST BRUMBAUGH
Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel
CHARLOTTE M. HARPER
Acting Chair, Opinion Committee
Attorney General opinions are persuasive, not binding on courts, and answer questions of law, not fact. Text extracted from the official PDF. Not legal advice.