Texas law on any date › Attorney General opinions
Attorney General Opinion KP-0236
Issued July 24, 2018 · request RQ0239KP
Re: Whether the Texas Southmost College District may acquire and hold title to land from the General Services Administration through the Federal Lands to Parks Program
Cites: ED §11, ED §61.067, ED §61.068, ED §11.1511, ED §11.156
The Attorney General's page · official PDF
KEN PAXTON
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
January 22, 2019
The Honorable Eddie Lucio, Jr.
Opinion No. KP-0236
Chair, Committee on Intergovernmental
Relations
Texas State Senate
Post Office Box 12068
Austin, Texas 78711-2068
Dear Senator Lucio:
Re: Whether the Texas Southmost College
District may acquire and hold title to land
from the General Services Administration
through the Federal Lands to Parks Program
(RQ-0239-KP)
You ask whether the board of trustees for the Texas Southmost College District ("District")
may acquire real property through the Federal Lands to_ Parks Program and whether it may
designate the land acquired forpublic recreational purposes. 1 The Federal Lands to Parks Program
authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to transfer to a state or political subdivision surplus real
property needed for use as a public park or recreation area. 40 U.S.C. § 550(b)(2)(C), (e)(2). As
a public junior college district, Texas Southmost College District is a political subdivision of the
State and is thereby eligible to receive land under the Federal Lands to Parks Program.· See TEX.
EDUC. CODE§ 130.122(±) ("Eachjunior college district ... is hereby declared to be, and constituted
as, a school district within the meaning of Article VII, Section 3, of the Texas Constitution.");
Wasson Interests, Ltd. v. City of Jacksonville, 489 S.W.3d 427, 429-30 (Tex. 2016) (stating school
districts are political subdivisions). You explain that the District seeks to acquire 18.76 acres of
land adjacent to property currently owned by the District, and it plans to use that property for
recreational purposes, including using the property's preexisting soccer field, baseball field, and
recreation center for both school and community purposes. Request Letter at 1-2.
You first ask whether the District is authorized to acquire real property through the Federal
Lands to Parks Program. Id. at 1. Answering your question requires analyzing the authority
granted to the District. The Higher Education Coordinating Board ("Board") exercises "general
control of the public junior colleges of Texas." TEX. EDUC. CODE§ 130.00l(a). All authority not
vested in the Board or the Texas Education Agency "is reserved and retained locally in each of the
· 1See Letter from Honorable Eddie Lucio, Jr., Chair, Senate Comm. on Intergov'tl Relations, to Honorable
Ken Paxton, Tex. Att'y Gen. at I (July 23, 2018), https://www2.texasattomeygeneral.gov/opinion/requests-for-
opinion-rqs ("Request Letter").
·
The Honorable Eddie Lucio, Jr. - Page 2
(KP-0236)
respective public junior college districts" or their governing boards. Id. § 130.002.2 Furthermore,
the "governing board of a junior college district shall be governed ... by the general law governing
the establishment, management, and control of independent school districts insofar as the general
law is applicable." Id § 130.084(a). In general, the trustees of an independent school district
"have the exclusive power and duty to govern and oversee the management of the public schools
of the district." Id § 11.151 (b ). The Legislature expressly provided that the trustees of an
independent school district "may acquire and hold real and personal property." Id § 1 l.151(a).
And no provision prohibits acquiring land from the federal government. Thus, the District may
generally acquire real property through the Federal Lands to Parks Program.
You also ask whether state law prevents the District from designating the land acquired for
public recreational use. Request Letter at 1. Section 11.156 of the Education Code provides: "A
conveyance, devise, or bequest of property for the benefit of the public schools made by anyone
for any ... district, if not otherwise directed by the donor, vests the property in the ... board of
trustees .... " TEX. EDUC. CODE § l 1. l 56(a). The District may use such property:
(1) for any purpose designated by the donor that is in keeping with
the lawful purposes of the schools for the benefit of which the
donation was made; or
(2) for any legal purpose if a specific purpose is not designated by
the donor.
Id § 11. l 56(b ). Accordingly, while the District's use of any property acquired or received by its
trustees must comply with the terms of the transfer, the use must also serve a lawful purpose of
the District. See Love v. City of Dallas, 40 S.W.2d 20, 26 (Tex. 1931) ("[T]he school property ...
should vest in certain trustees or officers ... for the use and benefit of the public free schools in
such city or town." (quotation marks omitted)). Furthermore, to the extent the District uses public
funds to acquire the land in question, that District must comply with any statutory and
constitutional requirements regarding the use of public funds. See Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No.
KP-0204 (2018) at 2.
You tell us the District plans to designate the land it wishes to acquire through the Federal
Lands to Parks Program for recreational use by both the public and the Texas Southmost College
District community. See Request Letter at 2. Texas courts have concluded that a board of trustees
possesses broad discretion in managing school property, provided the board acts consistent with
statutory requirements. See Kami v. Camp, 78 S.W.2d 1046, 1047 (Tex. Civ. App.-San Antonio
1935, writ dism'd) ("[I]n all other matters within those powers [school boards] have supreme
control, subject to supervision by the courts .... "); Nacogdoches Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Adams, 36
S.W.2d 567, 569 (Tex. Civ. App.-Beaumont 1931, no writ) ("Beyond question, the trustees of
our public schools are vested with discretion in the management, control, and protection of the
school property committed to their care, and the courts should not review this discretion except
2The Legislature gave the Board express authority to contract with and accept donations from "any agency
of the United States," but no provision in the Education Code suggests this authority is reserved exclusively for the
Board to the exclusion of individual junior college districts. TEX. EDUC. CODE§§ 61.067, .068.
The Honorable Eddie Lucio, Jr. - Page 3
(KP-0236)
upon a showing of abuse."). Additionally, section 11.1511 of the Education Code establishes the
specific powers and duties of a board of trustees of an independent school district and provides
that the board shall "seek to establish working relationships with other public entities to make
effective use of community resources and to serve the needs of public school students in the
community." TEX. EDUC. CODE § 11.1511 (b ). Allowing the public to use the District's park land
and recreational facilities when not needed by the District would appear to further this "effective
use of community resources." Id.; see Royse Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Reinhardt, 159 S.W. 1010, 1011
(Tex. Civ. App.-Dallas 1913, writ refd) (concluding a school district could allow a booster club
to use its baseball field and that doing so served a public purpose). However, it is for the District
to determine in the first instance whether designating land for recreational use by the public and
the District community serves a public purpose of the District. See TEX. EDUC. CODE§ 11.156(b ).
Thus, no state law prohibits the board of trustees for the Texas Southmost College District from
acquiring real property from the Federal Lands to Parks Program and designating it for public
recreational use, provided the use serves a public purpose of the District.
The Honorable Eddie Lucio, Jr. - Page 4
(KP-0236)
SUMMARY
No state law prohibits the board of trustees for the Texas
Southmost College District from acquiring property from the
Federal Lands to Parks Program and designating the land for public
recreational purposes if the use serves a public purpose of the
District.
·
JEFFREY C. MATEER
First Assistant Attorney General
BRANTLEY STARR
Deputy First Assistant Attorney General
VIRGINIA K. HOELSCHER
Chair, Opinion Committee
Very truly yours,
KEN PAXTON
Attorney General of Texas
Attorney General opinions are persuasive, not binding on courts, and answer questions of law, not fact. Text extracted from the official PDF. Not legal advice.