Texas law on any date › Attorney General opinions
Attorney General Opinion KP-0228
Issued May 04, 2018 · request RQ0230KP
Re: Whether a member of an independent school district board of trustees may simultaneously serve as the county judge
The Attorney General's page · official PDF
KEN PAXTON
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
The Honorable Marco A. Montemayor
Webb County Attorney
1110 Washington Street, Suite 301
Laredo, Texas 78040
Dear Mr. Montemayor:
January 7, 2019
Opinion No. KP-0228
Re: Whether a member of an independent
school
district
board
of trustees
may
simultaneously serve as the county judge
(RQ-0230-KP)
You ask whether a person serving on the board of trustees of an independent school district
may simultaneously serve as the county judge. 1 You tell us that in March 2018, a trustee of the
Jim Hogg County Independent School District was elected county judge for Jim Hogg County.·
See Request Letter at 1. Article XVI, section 40 of the Texas Constitution and the common-law
I
doctrine of incompatibility restrict dual office holding, and we address each in tum.
Article XVI, section 40 of the Texas Constitution prohibits a person from simultaneously
holding more than one "office of emolument." TEX. CONST. art. XVI, § 40(a). This provision
applies if both positions are offices entitled to an emolument, which is a "pecuniary profit, gain,
or advantage." State ex rel. Hill v. Pirtle, 887 S.W.2d 921,931 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994) (orig.
proceeding). A trustee serving on the school board of an independent school district receives no
compensation and therefore does not occupy an office of emolument.
TEX. Eouc. CODE~
§ 1 l.061(d).
Accordingly, article XVI, section 40(a) does not bar an individual from
simultaneously holding the two offices about which you ask.
We next consider the common-law doctrine of incompatibility. This doctrine comprises
three components: self-appointment, self-employment, and conflicting loyalties. See Tex. Att'y
Gen. Op. No. KP-0125 (2017) at 1. You tell us that neither office employs nor appoints the other,
and thus, the first two components do not apply. See Request Letter at 2; see also Tex. Att'y Gen.
Op. No. KP-0114 (2016) at 1. We examine the conflicting-loyalties component under the analysis
first described in Thomas v. Abernathy County Line Independent School District, 290 S.W. 152
(Tex. Comm'n App. 1927, judgm't adopted). In its decision, the court stated
there are in the city council or board of aldermen various directory
or supervisory powers exertable in respect to school property
1See Letter from Honorable Marco A. Montemayor, Webb Cty. Att'y, to Honorable Ken Paxton, Tex. Att'y
Gen. at I (May 4, 2018), https://www2.texasattomeygeneral.gov/opinion/requests-for-opinion-rqs ("Request
Letter").
The Honorable Marco A. Montemayor - Page 2
(KP-0228)
located within the city or town and in respect to the duties of school
trustee performable within its limits-e.g., there might well arise a
conflict of discretion or duty in respect to health, quarantine,
sanitary, and fire prevention regulations. If the same person could
be a school trustee and a member of the city council or board of
aldermen at the same time, school policies, in many important
respects, would be subject to direction of the council or aldermen
instead of to that of the trustees.
Id. at 153 (holding the offices of school trustee and city alderman as incompatible ( citations
omitted)). When determining the incompatibility of two offices, the "crucial question is whether
the occupancy of both offices by the same person is detrimental to the public interest or whether
the performance of the duties of one interferes with the performance of those of the other." Pirtle,
887 S.W.2d at 930. For the conflicting-loyalties analysis to apply, each position considered must
be an "office." See Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. KP-0125 (2017),at 2.
In this context, an officer is one upon whom "any sovereign function of the government"
is conferred "to be exercised by him for the benefit of the public largely independent of the control
of others." Aldine Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Standley, 280 S.W.2d 578, 583 (Tex. 1955). The Education
Code vests in trustees "the exclusive power and duty to govern and oversee the management of
the public schools of the district." TEX. EDUC. CODE § 11.151 (b ). Thus, a school board trustee
holds an office under Aldine. See Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. KP-0114 (2016) at 2. The county judge
is an elected position, and therefore an office. See TEX. CONST. art V, § 15 (providing that a county
judge shall be elected in each county); Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. JM-1266 (1990) at 2 (stating
"[ e ]lected officials are clearly officers" under the Aldine test).
Generally, where the geographical boundaries of two ent1t1es at issue overlap, "the
potential for conflicting loyalties increases because the duties of the two offices are more likely to
conflict." Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. KP-0023 (2015) at 2. In particular, this office has consistently
concluded that when "two districts with overlapping geographical jurisdictions each have the
power of taxation, ... the potential for conflict is insurmountable." Id.; see also Tex. Att'y Gen.
Op. Nos. KP-0125 (2017) at 2, GA-0786 (2010) at 3-4, GA-0032 (2003) at 5, JM-1266 (1990) at
4. Here, the geographic boundary of Jim Hogg County Independent School District as compared
to that of Jim Hogg County reveals a substantial, if not identical, overlap.2 In addition, both a
commissioners court and a school district board have taxing authority within their respective
boundaries. See TEX. CONST. art. VIII, § 9(b) (vesting the commissioners court with authority to
levy the annual tax rate for the county); see also TEX. EDUC. CODE § 11.1511 (b )(8) (authorizing
school district board to adopt a tax rate each fiscal year). Because each entity about which you
ask has taxing authority in territory that overlaps with the other, conflicting-loyalties
2Compare
TEX.
STATE
HISTORICAL
ASS'N.,
TEX.
ALMANAC
338
(69th
ed.
2018),
https://texasalmana~.com/sites/default/files/images/maps/JimHogg.pdf (illustrating Jim Hogg County boundary
lines), with Jim Hogg County !SD Boundary Map, MAPTECHNICA, https://www.maptechnica.com/school-district-
map/TX/Jim+Hogg+County+Independent+School+District/unsd/4824750 (providing a map of school district
boundary lines).
-
The Honorable Marco A. Montemayor - Page 3
(KP-0228)
incompatibility prohibits simultaneous service on the governing body of both entities. Thus, an
individual may not serve as the Jim Hogg County Judge while simultaneously serving as a member
of the board of trustees of the Jim Hogg County Independent School District.3
3You tell us the individual was a member of the Jim Hogg County Independent School District when he was
elected county judge for Jim Hogg County for a term beginning in January 2019. When an officer accepts an
incompatible office, "a vacancy in the first office occurs on the date the person qualifies for the other office." TEX.
ELEC. CODE § 201.025. A person elected to a regular term of office "shall qualify and assume the duties of office
on, or soon as possible after, January 1 of the year following the person's election." TEX. Gov'T CODE §·601.003(b ).
The Honorable Marco A. Montemayor - Page 4
(KP-0228)
SUMMARY
A person may not serve as Jim Hogg County Judge while
simultaneously serving as a member of the board of trustees of the
Jim Hogg County Independent School District.
JEFFREY C. MATEER
First Assistant Attorney General
BRANTLEY STARR
Deputy First Assistant Attorney General
VIRGINIA K. HOELSCHER
Chair, Opinion Committee
BECKY P. CASARES
Very truly yours,
KEN PAXTON
Attorney General of Texas
Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee
Attorney General opinions are persuasive, not binding on courts, and answer questions of law, not fact. Text extracted from the official PDF. Not legal advice.