Nonpartisan public records for Texas special districts Resident sign in
Texas Open Books

Texas law on any date › Attorney General opinions

Attorney General Opinion KP-0228

Issued May 04, 2018 · request RQ0230KP

Re: Whether a member of an independent school district board of trustees may simultaneously serve as the county judge

Cites: CN §16.40, CN §8.9

The Attorney General's page · official PDF

KEN PAXTON ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS The Honorable Marco A. Montemayor Webb County Attorney 1110 Washington Street, Suite 301 Laredo, Texas 78040 Dear Mr. Montemayor: January 7, 2019 Opinion No. KP-0228 Re: Whether a member of an independent school district board of trustees may simultaneously serve as the county judge (RQ-0230-KP) You ask whether a person serving on the board of trustees of an independent school district may simultaneously serve as the county judge. 1 You tell us that in March 2018, a trustee of the Jim Hogg County Independent School District was elected county judge for Jim Hogg County.· See Request Letter at 1. Article XVI, section 40 of the Texas Constitution and the common-law I doctrine of incompatibility restrict dual office holding, and we address each in tum. Article XVI, section 40 of the Texas Constitution prohibits a person from simultaneously holding more than one "office of emolument." TEX. CONST. art. XVI, § 40(a). This provision applies if both positions are offices entitled to an emolument, which is a "pecuniary profit, gain, or advantage." State ex rel. Hill v. Pirtle, 887 S.W.2d 921,931 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994) (orig. proceeding). A trustee serving on the school board of an independent school district receives no compensation and therefore does not occupy an office of emolument. TEX. Eouc. CODE~ § 1 l.061(d). Accordingly, article XVI, section 40(a) does not bar an individual from simultaneously holding the two offices about which you ask. We next consider the common-law doctrine of incompatibility. This doctrine comprises three components: self-appointment, self-employment, and conflicting loyalties. See Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. KP-0125 (2017) at 1. You tell us that neither office employs nor appoints the other, and thus, the first two components do not apply. See Request Letter at 2; see also Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. KP-0114 (2016) at 1. We examine the conflicting-loyalties component under the analysis first described in Thomas v. Abernathy County Line Independent School District, 290 S.W. 152 (Tex. Comm'n App. 1927, judgm't adopted). In its decision, the court stated there are in the city council or board of aldermen various directory or supervisory powers exertable in respect to school property 1See Letter from Honorable Marco A. Montemayor, Webb Cty. Att'y, to Honorable Ken Paxton, Tex. Att'y Gen. at I (May 4, 2018), https://www2.texasattomeygeneral.gov/opinion/requests-for-opinion-rqs ("Request Letter"). The Honorable Marco A. Montemayor - Page 2 (KP-0228) located within the city or town and in respect to the duties of school trustee performable within its limits-e.g., there might well arise a conflict of discretion or duty in respect to health, quarantine, sanitary, and fire prevention regulations. If the same person could be a school trustee and a member of the city council or board of aldermen at the same time, school policies, in many important respects, would be subject to direction of the council or aldermen instead of to that of the trustees. Id. at 153 (holding the offices of school trustee and city alderman as incompatible ( citations omitted)). When determining the incompatibility of two offices, the "crucial question is whether the occupancy of both offices by the same person is detrimental to the public interest or whether the performance of the duties of one interferes with the performance of those of the other." Pirtle, 887 S.W.2d at 930. For the conflicting-loyalties analysis to apply, each position considered must be an "office." See Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. KP-0125 (2017),at 2. In this context, an officer is one upon whom "any sovereign function of the government" is conferred "to be exercised by him for the benefit of the public largely independent of the control of others." Aldine Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Standley, 280 S.W.2d 578, 583 (Tex. 1955). The Education Code vests in trustees "the exclusive power and duty to govern and oversee the management of the public schools of the district." TEX. EDUC. CODE § 11.151 (b ). Thus, a school board trustee holds an office under Aldine. See Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. KP-0114 (2016) at 2. The county judge is an elected position, and therefore an office. See TEX. CONST. art V, § 15 (providing that a county judge shall be elected in each county); Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. JM-1266 (1990) at 2 (stating "[ e ]lected officials are clearly officers" under the Aldine test). Generally, where the geographical boundaries of two ent1t1es at issue overlap, "the potential for conflicting loyalties increases because the duties of the two offices are more likely to conflict." Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. KP-0023 (2015) at 2. In particular, this office has consistently concluded that when "two districts with overlapping geographical jurisdictions each have the power of taxation, ... the potential for conflict is insurmountable." Id.; see also Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. Nos. KP-0125 (2017) at 2, GA-0786 (2010) at 3-4, GA-0032 (2003) at 5, JM-1266 (1990) at 4. Here, the geographic boundary of Jim Hogg County Independent School District as compared to that of Jim Hogg County reveals a substantial, if not identical, overlap.2 In addition, both a commissioners court and a school district board have taxing authority within their respective boundaries. See TEX. CONST. art. VIII, § 9(b) (vesting the commissioners court with authority to levy the annual tax rate for the county); see also TEX. EDUC. CODE § 11.1511 (b )(8) (authorizing school district board to adopt a tax rate each fiscal year). Because each entity about which you ask has taxing authority in territory that overlaps with the other, conflicting-loyalties 2Compare TEX. STATE HISTORICAL ASS'N., TEX. ALMANAC 338 (69th ed. 2018), https://texasalmana~.com/sites/default/files/images/maps/JimHogg.pdf (illustrating Jim Hogg County boundary lines), with Jim Hogg County !SD Boundary Map, MAPTECHNICA, https://www.maptechnica.com/school-district- map/TX/Jim+Hogg+County+Independent+School+District/unsd/4824750 (providing a map of school district boundary lines). - The Honorable Marco A. Montemayor - Page 3 (KP-0228) incompatibility prohibits simultaneous service on the governing body of both entities. Thus, an individual may not serve as the Jim Hogg County Judge while simultaneously serving as a member of the board of trustees of the Jim Hogg County Independent School District.3 3You tell us the individual was a member of the Jim Hogg County Independent School District when he was elected county judge for Jim Hogg County for a term beginning in January 2019. When an officer accepts an incompatible office, "a vacancy in the first office occurs on the date the person qualifies for the other office." TEX. ELEC. CODE § 201.025. A person elected to a regular term of office "shall qualify and assume the duties of office on, or soon as possible after, January 1 of the year following the person's election." TEX. Gov'T CODE §·601.003(b ). The Honorable Marco A. Montemayor - Page 4 (KP-0228) SUMMARY A person may not serve as Jim Hogg County Judge while simultaneously serving as a member of the board of trustees of the Jim Hogg County Independent School District. JEFFREY C. MATEER First Assistant Attorney General BRANTLEY STARR Deputy First Assistant Attorney General VIRGINIA K. HOELSCHER Chair, Opinion Committee BECKY P. CASARES Very truly yours, KEN PAXTON Attorney General of Texas Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee

Attorney General opinions are persuasive, not binding on courts, and answer questions of law, not fact. Text extracted from the official PDF. Not legal advice.