Texas law on any date › Attorney General opinions
Attorney General Opinion JM-1265
Issued December 19, 1990
Re: Whether certain funds Commissioner of Texas Education 1701 N. Congress Avenue from school-related activities Austin, Texas 78701-1494 may be used by a school dis- trict to provide scholarships for graduates
Cites: ED §20.48
The Attorney General's page · official PDF
December 19, 1990
Dr. W. N. Kirby
OpiniOn
No. JM-1265
Education
Agency
Re:
Whether certain funds
Commissioner of
Texas Education
1701 N. Congress Avenue
from school-related activities
Austin, Texas 78701-1494
may be used by a school dis-
trict to provide scholarships
for graduates (RQ-2092)
Dear Dr. Kirby:
You ask whether, in the absence of a donation, locally
derived monies that have become public school property may
be used for college scholarships awarded by the public
school district.
Specifically, YOU refer to so-called
"activity funds" or "agency funds," which you describe as
the funds considered by this office in an earlier, unrelated
opinion, Attorney General Opinion JM-42 (1983).
In that
opinion, these funds were described as follows:
[Tlhose monies belonging to various organiza-
tions such as
the PTA
(Parent-Teachers
Association), school bands, drill team clubs,
and athletic booster clubs which are held by
a school district for safekeeping and ac-
counting. The monies are not derived from
taxes but are generally obtained by
an
organization through solicitation of contri-
butions, promotions and similar functions for
the sole benefit of the organization, with
such monies being the property of the organ-
ization and not the school districts.
The
school district merely acts as custodian of
the monies.
You advise that, in addition to the above described
funds, nactivity funds" or "agency funds" may include funds
generated by a public school from class ring sales, photos,
student club and class balances, and other activities.
According to your letter,
P. 6758
Dr. W. N. Kirby - Page 2
(JM-1265)
[plublic schools have varying arrangements
with patron/student groups. In some cases
surplus monies are transferred to the dis-
trict and become district property under the
terms of
the custodial agreement; in other
cases the monies remain the property of the
patron/student organization and surplus can
be donated to the district.
As an example, you enclose a letter from the superin-
tendent of the Aldine Independent School District to the
Texas Education Agency that describes the following fact
situation:
The district manages agency funds generated
by school activities.
The district keeps a
ledger record of the monies deposited from
each activity. These commingled monies are
to be used for their students, and the
balance
remaining
in
interest-bearing bank account
the
single
is
carried
forward from year to year.
The superintendent's letter goes on to inquire whether
interest accruing on the funds in the above-described
account may be used for college scholarships. You do not
explain how the interest accrued on the account described in
the superintendent's letter becomes the property of the
school district, but presumably, it is by contractual
agreement and not by donation.1
1. Section 21.903 of the Education Code provides, in
part:
(b)
The funds or other property donated or
the income therefrom may be expended by
the
trustees:
(1)
for any purpose designated by the
donor so long as that purpose is in keeping
with the lawful purposes of the schools for
the benefit of which the donation was made;
or
(2)
for any purpose authorized by rule
(Footnote Continued)
p. 6759
Dr. W. N. Kirby - Page 3
(JM-1265)
Section 20.48 of the Education Code prescribes the
purposes for which funds of the public free school system
may be expended. Subsection (c) of that section enumerates
purposes for which l*[l]ocal school funds from district
taxes, tuition fees of pupils not entitled to free tuition
and Qther local sources" may be used. (Emphasis added.)
In
addition to the purposes specifically enumerated, subsection
(c) provides that such funds may be used "for other purposes
necessary in the conduct of the public schools to be
deter-
mined bv the board of tru6tees.l' (Emphasis added.)
You suggest that an expenditure for scholarship purpos-
es would not appear %ecessaryq' to conduct a public school.
Certainly such an expenditure is not %ecessaryl’
if neces-
sary is taken to mean "indispensable."
However, the word
necessary as used in section
20.48
and its predecessor
statute, article 2827, V.T.C.S., has been construed as
permitting such
expenditures
as
medical
inspection,
cafeterias, crossing guards, and the reimbursement
of
certain expenses incurred by school board members.
See
N selev v. Citv of Dallas 17 S.W.2d 36 (Tex. Comm'n App.
lz29, judgm't adopted): &eman
v. Morrow, 34 S.W.2d 654
(Tex. Civ. App. - El Paso 1931, no writ): Attorney General
Opinions JM-490 (1986); H-133 (1973). Other examples could
be cited. None of the expenditures in these examples is,
strictly speaking, indispensable to the conduct of a public
school. In the context of section 20.48, wnecessary" appears
to mean appropriate or conducive to the conduct of a public
school rather than indispensable thereto. Accord Black's
Law Dictionary
928
(6th ed.
1990)
(definition
of
%ecessaryt').
Determining whether an expenditure is necessary is a
matter for a school board in its sound discretion. Attorney
General Opinion H-133. Moreover, any expenditure of public
funds must serve a true public purpose and not merely
private ends. Tex. Const. art. III, 5 51; ~&,8 G. Braden,
.
T~I= Constitution of the State of Texas. An Annotated a nd
Comoarative Analvsis 229-36, and authorities cited therein.
(Footnote Continued)
of the State Board of Education in the event
that no specific purpose is designated by the
donor.
p. 6760
Dr. W. N. Kirby - Page 4
(JM-1265)
The encouragement and motivation of students in academ-
ic achievement would seem to be an appropriate function of
the public free schools. Accordingly, it. is not possible to
say, as a matter of law, that a scholarship could not be
structured to further the achievement of a legitimate public
purpose of a school district in its conduct of the public
schools. The use of "activity fundsO' or "agency funds" not
being otherwise restricted, they may be used for college
scholarships found to be Wecessary in the conduct of the
public schoolsO* within the meaning of section 20.48 of the
Education Code. The authority to make such a determination
of fact has been delegated by the legislature to the board
of trustees.
SUMMARY
In the absence of a donation, monies
derived from various organizations such as
the PTA, school bands, drill team clubs, and
athletic booster clubs or generated by a
public school from class ring sales, photos,
student club and class balances, and other
activities ("activity
funds" or
"agency
funds") that have
become public
school
property may be used for college scholarships
awarded by the public school district if such
scholarships are found to be %ecessary
in
the conduct of the public schoolsn within the
meaning of section 20.48 of the Education
Code.
The
authority
to make
such
determination of fact has been delegated b;
the legislature to the board of trustees.
Very truly yo
J h
A
JIM
MATTOX
Attorney General of Texas
MARYKELLER
First Assistant Attorney General
LOU MCCREARY
Executive Assistant Attorney General
JUDGE ZOLLIE STEAKLEY
Special Assistant Attorney General
p. 6761
-
.
Dr. W. N. Kirby - Page 5
(JM-1265)
RENEA HICKS
Special Assistant Attorney General
RICK GILPIN
Chairman, Opinion Committee
Prepared by John Steiner
Assistant Attorney General
P. 6762
Attorney General opinions are persuasive, not binding on courts, and answer questions of law, not fact. Text extracted from the official PDF. Not legal advice.