Texas law on any date › Attorney General opinions
Attorney General Opinion JM-1121
Issued December 20, 1989
Re: Authority of a sheriff to contract regarding the jail commissary without consulting the county purchasing agent
Cites: LG §262.011, LG §351.0415
The Attorney General's page · official PDF
December 20, 1989
Honorable Tom O'Connell
Collin County Criminal
Opinion No. JM-1121
District Attorney
Collin County Courthouse
l&Kinney, Texas
75069
Re: Authority of a sheriff to
contract
regarding
the
jail
commissary without
consulting
the county
purchasing
agent
(RQ-1846)
Dear Mr. O'Connell:
You ask whether the sheriff may enter into a contract
regarding the county jail commissary without consulting
the.
county purchasing
agent.
In analyzing
your
question,
a
brief review
of statutes
and attorney
general
opinions
concerning the authority of county officers to contract
and
make expenditures is necessary.
Attorney General Opinion JM-974 (1988) concluded
that
in counties
with
county purchasing
agents,1
the county
purchasing agent must make
all purchases
that are not
subject to the competitive
bidding requirements of section
262.023 of the Local Government Code.
Attorney General Opinion MW-439 (1982) concluded
that
items purchased with profits
from the jail commissary
were
subject to the competitive
bid requirements the same as
other purchases made for county officers.
The opinion found
that the fact that article 5116, V.T.C.S.
(now section
351.041 of the Local Government Code), makes the sheriff
responsible for operation of the jail does not constitute an
exception to the requirement that the commissioners
court
must make purchases
subject
to the competitive
bidding
procedure.
(The matter of a county purchasing agent was not
in issue.) See Attorney General Opinion JM-783 (1987).
1. Section
262.011 of the Local Government
Code
provides that in a county with a population
of 74,000
or
more persons, a county purchasing agent may be appointed.
P. 5891
Honorable Tom O'Connell - Page 2 (JM-1121)
Certain statutes vest county officers with authority to
make expenditures without
regard to the county
purchasing
agent or the competitive bidding process.
Within the limits
set out in article 53.08 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure
(now Code of Criminal
Procedure
article
102.007),
fees
derived from the collection of hot checks are expendable
at
the sole discretion of county attorneys, criminal
district
attorneys, and district attorneys.
Expenditures from funds
generated by
forfeitures
under
section
5.08 of article
4476-15, V.T.C.S., are administered by the seizing
agencies
or the office
to which
they are forfeited.
See Attorney
General Opinion JW-313 (1985).
The 71st Legislature
amended subchapter
C of chapter
351 of the Local Government Code by adding section
351.0415
providing that a sheriff may operate a commissary for use of
the prisoners in a county
jail. The bill enacting
section
351.0415 provides:
(a) The sheriff of a county with a popul
lation of under 200,000 according to the last
federal census mav ooerate. or contract
with
another oerson to ooerate. a commissary
for
the use
of the prisoners committed
to the
county jail. The commissary must be operated
in accordance
with
rules
adopted
by the
Commission on Jail Standards.
(b) The sheriff:
(1)
h s
a
cqfunds;
0
(2) shall maintain
commissary
ac-
counts showing the amount of proceeds from
the commissary
operation and the amount
and purpose of disbursements made from the
proceeds; and
(3) shall accent new bids to renew
c
t
commissarv
suooliers
everv
ontrac s of
five years.
(c) The sheriff mav use commissarv
oro-
ceeds onlv to:
(1) fund, staff, and equip a program
addressing the social needs of the county
prisoners,
including
an educational
or
Pa 5892
Honorable Tom O'Connell - Page 3 (JM-1121)
recreational
program
and religious
or
rehabilitative counseling:
(2)
supply county prisoners
with
clothing, writing
materials, and hygiene
supplies;
(3) establish. staff. and eouin the
commissarv ooerat tin: or
(4) f und
'b
for the
educational
use
of
countv
prisoners.
(d) At
least once each quarter
of a
county's fiscal year,
or more
often if the
county auditor
desires, the auditor
shall,
without advance
notice,
fully examine
the
jail commissary accounts.
The auditor
shall
verify the correctness of the accounts
and
report the findings of the examination to the
commissioners court of the county at its next
term beginning after the date the audit
is
completed.
SECTION 2. This
Act
takes
effect
September 1, 1989, and on that date, the
oneration
and unexnended
oroceeds
of anv
existina
countv
iail
cozunissarv shall be
delivered to the sheriff of the county
in
which the commissary
is located.
(Emphasis
added.)
H.B. 669, Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 980, at 4056
(effective
Sept. 1, 1989).
Section 351.0415 gives the sheriff exclusive control of
the commissary
funds, requires
the sheriff
to accept
new
bids to renew contracts of suppliers every five years, vests
the sheriff with authority to equip the commissary, and fund
and staff a library for the prisoners.
The sheriff is not
only empowered
to operate
the commissary,
but
is also
authorized to execute
a contract for another
person
to
operate the commissary.
The express enumeration of particular persons or things
in a statute is tantamount to an express exclusion of all
others.
Ex carte McIver, 586 S.W.2d 851
(Tex. Crim. App.
1979).
p. 5893
.Honorable Tom O'Connell - Page 4 (JM-1121)
We conclude that by virtue
of the express language
of
section 351.0415,
the sheriff may enter into a contract
regarding the county jail commissary without consulting
the
county purchasing agent or being subject to action taken
by
the commissioners
court in a competitive
bidding
process
under section 262.023.
We do note that certain
limitations are
imposed
on
expenditures by the statute and that the commissary must
be
operated in accordance with rules adopted by the Commission
on Jail Standards.
SUMMARY
Section 351.0415 of the Local Government
Code authorizes the Collin County Sheriff
to
enter into a contract
regarding the
county
jail commissary without consulting the county
purchasing agent.
J I M'
MATTOX
Attorney General of Texas
MARY KELLER
First Assistant Attorney General
LOU MCCREARY
Executive Assistant Attorney General
JUDGE ZOLLIE STEAKLKY
Special Assistant Attorney General
RICK GILPIN
Chairman, Opinion Committee
Prepared by Tom G. Davis
Assistant Attorney General
p. 5894
Attorney General opinions are persuasive, not binding on courts, and answer questions of law, not fact. Text extracted from the official PDF. Not legal advice.