Texas law on any date › Attorney General opinions
Attorney General Opinion JM-1098
Issued September 21, 1989
Re: Authority of a commission- 804 Pecan Street ers court to promulgate regula- Bastrop, Texas 78602 tions regarding smoking in the county jail, and related gues- tions
Cites: LG §351.041, LG §351.002
The Attorney General's page · official PDF
THE
ATTORNEY
GENERAL
OF
TEXAS
September 21, 1989
Honorable Charles 0. Penick
Opinion No. JM-log8
Criminal District Attorney
Bastrop County
Re: Authority of a commission-
804 Pecan Street
ers court to promulgate regula-
Bastrop, Texas
78602
tions regarding smoking in the
county jail, and related
gues-
tions
(RQ-1752)
Dear Mr. Penick:
You advise that the commissioners court is building
a
new county jail in Bastrop County and "is attempting to make
rules concerning
incarcerated
not allowing
anyone,
including
inmates
in the jail,
to smoke anywhere
in
the
building."
In connection with the
foregoing scenario you ask the
following questions:
1. Does the Commissioner's Court have the
authority to regulate whether inmates of the
jail may
smoke or does this authority
lie
solely in the discretion of the Sheriff?
2. Does smoking
in d county
jail by
inmates constitute
a hazard
to nonsmoking
inmates?
May smoking by inmates be prohibited
in i*county jail?
4. What rules may be dictated
to the
Sheriff by the Commissioner's Court
concern-
ing the operation
of the jail?
Is their
legal authority only to prov~ide the jail and
adequate funding to operate it?
5. What remedy would the Commissioner's
Court have
against the Sheriff if a broad
operational guide line for the operation
of
the jail was set by the Commissionergs
Court
p. 5751
Honorable Charles D. Penick - Page 2 (JM-1098)
and the Sheriff did not abide by the guide--
lines?
In Wilson v. Lvnauah, 878 F.2d 846 (5th Cir. 1989), the
Fifth Circuit rejected a prison inmate's claim that exposure
to environmental tobacco smoke violated his Eighth Amendment
right
to be free from cruel and unusual
punishment.
However, we do not believe this holding can be construed
to
vest an inmate or anyone else with a constitutional right to
smoke in a jail or a prison.
Section 48.01 of the
Penal
Code makes it an offense to smoke tobacco in public
primary
and secondary
schools,
elevators,
enclosed
theaters
or
movie-houses, libraries, museums, hospitals, transit
system
buses, or intrastate buses.
Attorney General Opinion JM-737
(1987) concluded
that an ordinance by a home-rule
city
prohibiting smoking in public places was not violative
of
any state law.
Prison officials are not required to meet
health
and safety
standards
for persons
who
are
not
incarcerated.
uq
693 F.2d 566, 569 (5th Cir.
1982). Granting
an inmate the right to smoke would
be
ironic when such privilege is often denied
non-incarcerated
citizens.
You ask whether the authority to regulate the smoking
'by inmates is within the province of the commissioners court
or the sheriff.
Former article 5115, V.T.C.S., required the
commissioners court to provide
a "safe and suitable
jail."
Article 5115 was amended by House Bill 1314, Acts 1987, 70th
Leg., ch. 883,
§ 1, effective September
1, 1987, and such
amendment was carried
forward and given
effect as part
of
section 351.001 of the Local Government Code.
The amendment
contains detailed provisions
defining the responsibilities
of the commissioners court
in providing "safe and suitable
jails."
Among the requirements with which the commissioners
court is charged is the responsibility of providing the jail
with proper
sanitation, ventilation,
cleanliness,
health,
adequate security and safety conditions.
The question
of
whether the commissioners court has authority to determine
if county
jail
inmates smoke turns
on whether
it is
necessary to impose such a regulation to comply with
the
commissioners court's responsibility under section
351.001.
The resolution
of this question
is dependent
upon
the
circumstances existing in a particular county jail and must
be resolved on a case-by-case basis.
Such a factual determ-
ination is not within the province of the opinion process.
Section 351.041 of the Local Government Code
(formerly
article
5116, V.T.C.S.)
designates
the sheriff
as the
p. 5752
Honorable Charles D. Penick - Page 3 (JM-1098)
"keeper of the county jail" and provides he shall
"exercise
supervision and control over the jail."
In Attorney General
Opinion H-1190 (1978) it was stated that under then
article
5116 the authority of the commissioners court over the
jail
is limited to providing the jail adequate funding and broad
operational guidelines, and that the actual operation of the
jail is the responsibility of the sheriff.
Attorney General Opinion H-1190 stated that under
then
article 5116 the authority to supervise, direct and control
the jail is vested in the office of the sheriff.
Whirl
Kerq, 407 F.2d 781 (5th Cir. 1968), addressed the responsXl
bilities of the sheriff as keeper of the jail.
In Whirl
it
was stated "the statutory obligations of a Texas sheriff are
not amorphous
ones . . . . Article
5116 places
the
responsibility for the county jail directly upon the county
sheriff . . . .'I Id.
at 794-795.
We are of the opinion
that the sheriff as "keeper of the county
jail" has
the
discretion to make any reasonable rules relative to super-
vision of prisoners and the operation of the jail, including
whether smoking is allowed
in the jail.
In the event
the
sheriff should permit smoking in the jail, the commissioners
court may only prohibit same if it falls within its respons-
ibility of providing
a "safe and suitable
jail" under
section 351.001 of the Local Government Code.1
We cannot
address your
second question
because
it
requires the resolution
of fact issues.
Also,
Attorney
General Opinions address
specific legal questions.
We 'do
not provide
the type of general
legal advice
that your
fourth and fifth questions call
for. Therefore, we do not
answer those questions.
1. Section
351.002
states
that
the
standards
prescribed
by this subchapter
are
"minimum
standards."
Article 5115.1, V.T.C.S.,
vests
the Commission
on Jail
Standards with
authority
to promulgate
reasonable
rules
relative to construction and operation of jails,
including
establishing minimum
standards for the custody,
care
and
treatment of prisoners.
Section
351.002 provides that the
county jail must comply with
the minimum standards and the
rules and procedures of the Commission on Jail Standards.
p. 5753
Honorable Charles D. Penick - Page 4 (JM-1098)
SUMMARY
The sheriff
as "keeper of the county
jail" has the discretion to make
reasonable
regulations relative
to the supervision
of
prisoners and operation of the jail,
includ-
ing the authority
to determine
whether
smoking should be allowed
in the jail.
The
county
commissioners
court may
prohibit
smoking by inmates in the county jail if it
falls within its responsibility to provide
a
"safe and suitable
jail" under
section
351.001 of the Local Government Code.
JIM
.MATTOX
Attorney General of Texas
MARY KELLER
First Assistant Attorney General
LOU MCCREARY
Executive Assistant Attorney General
JUDGE ZOLLIE STEAKLEY
Special Assistant Attorney General
RICK GILPIN
Chairman, Opinion Committee
Prepared by Tom G. Davis
Assistant Attorney General
p. 5754
Attorney General opinions are persuasive, not binding on courts, and answer questions of law, not fact. Text extracted from the official PDF. Not legal advice.