Texas law on any date › Attorney General opinions
Attorney General Opinion JM-1054
Issued June 08, 1989
Re: Location of justice of the peace offices in Hardeman County
Cites: LG §351.041, GV §291.001
The Attorney General's page · official PDF
,
THE
AT
ESERAI.
June 8, 1989
Honorable Stanley R. Watson
County Attorney
Hardeman County
P. 0. Box 506
Quanah, Texas
79252
Opinion No. JM-1054
Re: Location of justice
of the peace offices
in
Hardeman County (RQ-1688)
Dear Mr. Watson:
You advise that the office space used by the justice of
the peace is presently
located in a building owned by the
county that also houses
the jail facility, the sheriff's
office and offices of the local office of the Department
of
Public Safety.
Information furnished by you reflects
that
the sheriff wants the justic,e of the peace moved to the
courthouse. ~This background has prompted your question
as
to whether
the location
of that office
is within
the
province of the sheriff or the commissioners court.
Section 292.004 of the Local Government Code provides
in pertinent part:
may
(a) The commissioners
;;rt of a county
provide,
inside
municipality
designated as the county seat, an auxiliary
courthouse,
a jail, a parking
garage,
a
facility for district,
county, and precinct
administrative
and
judicial
offices
and
courtrooms, or any facility related to the
administration of civil or criminal justice.
Information furnished by you reflects that the facility
in question is known as the VVIaw Enforcement Building"
and
the sheriff., "as keeper of the jail, *I feels he is authorized
to determine who occupies the building.
Section
351.041(a)
of
the Local Government
Code
provides:
The sheriff of each county is the keeper
of the county jail. The sheriff shall safely
keep all prisoners committed to the jail by a
p. 5488
Honorable Stanley R. Watson - Page 2
(JM-1054)
lawful authority, subject to an order of the
proper court.
A justice
of the peace is an elected
constitutional
official.
Tex. Const.
art. V, g 18.
You advise that the
justice of the peace conducts the business of his office,
including the trial of cases
in the room he occupies.
The
fact that the justice of the peace has quarters in the same
building where the jail is located does not vest the sheriff
with authority to remove the justice of the peace from the
building.
We next consider whether
the sheriff
is vested
with
authority to determine
the location of the justice of the
peace under
section 291.003 of the Local Government
Code
(formerly article 6872, V.T.C.S.).
Section 291.003
relates
to control of the courthouse, providing "the county
sheriff
shall have charge and control
of the county
courthouse,
subject to the regulations of the commissioners court."
In
Anderson v. Wood,
152 S.W.2d
1084, 1086
(Tex. 1941), the
Texas
Supreme
Court construed
article
6872
(now Local
Government Code section 291.003), as follows:
The above
statute places
the sheriff
in
charge and control of the court house merely
for the purpose of keeping order and preserv-
ing the property.
These dare ministerial
duties that are in keeping with the duties of
a peace officer.
In Attorney General Opinion O-4747 (1942), it was
concluded
that the holding in Dodson v. Marshall, 118 S.W.Zd 621 (Tex.
Civ. APP.
- Waco
1938, writ ref'd w.o.m.),
that the
commissioners court had discretionary
power
to allow
a
person to operate a cold drink stand in an unused alcove
in
the courthouse was not authority for the sheriff to exercise
the same power.
Neither
section
291.003 nor
section
351.041(a) vests the sheriff with authority to determine the
location of the offices
of the justice of the peace or of
other precinct
or county
officials
in the courthouse
or
other buildings
operated by the county for its official
business.
Article
V, section
18 of the Texas
Constitution
provides that the commissioners
court "shall exercise
such
powers and jurisdiction over all county business,
as is
conferred by this Constitution and the laws of the State, or
as may be hereafter
prescribed.*'
In Cosbv v. County
Commissioners of Randall Countv, 712 S.W.Zd 246 (Tex. App. -
Amarillo 1986, writ ref'd n.r.e.), it was noted that in the
P. 5489
Honorable Stanley R. Watson - Page 3 (JM-1054)
exercise of powers conferred
upon the commissioners
court,
the court has
implied authority
to exercise
a
broad
discretion to accomplish
the purposes
intended.
Section
291.001
of
the Local
Government
Code
requires
the
commissioners court to provide a courthouse and offices
for
county officers.
See also
Koehler v. Earl, 14 S.W. 28 (Tex.
1890) ; Alexander v. Svoboda, 297 S.W. 560 (Tex. Civ. App.
-
Galveston 1927), rev'd on other qrounds, 3 S.W.2d 423
(Tex.
1928) (justice court terms held at times and places
desig-
nated by commissioners court).
The commissioners court
is
the active governing body of the county and has at least the
implied authority to regulate the use of the courthouse
and
other county buildings.
See Dodson v. Marshall, sunra.
It
follows that the commissioners court has the authority
to
determine whether the office of the justice
of the peace
shall be located
in the courthouse or other county
owned
buildings.
SUMMARY
The location
of the quarters
in the
courthouse or county owned buildings
where
the justice of the peace conducts trials
and
the business
of that office is within
the.
province
of the
commissioners
court
of
Hardeman County.
I
Very truly you
J
iil?&t
A
JIM
MATTOX
Attorney General of Texas
MARY KELLER
First Assistant Attorney General
LOU MCCREARY
Executive Assistant Attorney General
JUDGE ZOLLIE STEAKLEY
Special Assistant Attorney General
RICK GILPIN
Chairman, Opinion Committee
Prepared by Tom G.
Davis
Assistant Attorney General
p. 5490
Attorney General opinions are persuasive, not binding on courts, and answer questions of law, not fact. Text extracted from the official PDF. Not legal advice.