Attorney General Opinion JM-1024

February 28, 1989 Honorable Terra1 Smith Opinion No. JM-1024 Chairman Natural Resources Re: Whether a commissioners Texas House of Representatives court may authorize the P. 0. Box 2910 creation of a single-county Austin, Texas 78769 underground water district under section 52.022 of the Water Code (RQ-1606) Dear Representative Smith: You ask: Under Subchapter B, Chapter 52, Water Code, is the Texas Water Commission the only governmental entity that may authorize the creation of an underground water district or may a county, in the case of a proposed single-county district, authorize the crea- tion of a district pursuant to Section 52.022, Water Code, and Chapter 51, Water Code? Chapter 52 of the Water Code provides for the creation and operation of underground water conservation districts. Subchapter B provides for the creation of such districts generally. We conclude that the Texas Water Commission is the only governmental body having jurisdiction over the creation of an underground water conservation district pursuant to subchapter B of chapter 52 of the Water Code. A commis- sioners court has no such authority. Provisions for the creation of underground water conservation districts were first adopted in 1949. Acts 1949, 51st Leg., ch. 306, § 1, at 559. The 1949 act's provisions added new section 3c to the provisions of a 1925 act which had provided for the creation and operation of water control and improvement districts. Acts 1925, 39th Leg., ch. 25, S 1, at 86. p* 5279 Honorable Terra1 Smith - Page 2 (JM-1024) Subsection B of section 3c, added by the 1949 act, pro- vided in part: Districts1 may hereafter be created for the conservation, preservation, protection, and recharging and the prevention of waste of the underground water of an underground water reservoir or subdivision thereof, defined and designated in accordance with the provisions of Subsection C of this Section 3c. To accomplish these purposes pursuant to Section 59 a, b, and c, of Article XVI of the Consti- tution of Texas, the administrative and mocedural orovisions as now or hereafter contained in Chanter 25. Acts of the Reoular Session of the Thirtv-ninth Leaislature of the State of Te a . 1925. as amended. 'n so faZ is annlicable shall @DDlV 1 to such Dis- tricts, but such Districts shall not be organized for any purposes except those set forth in this Section 3c. (Emphasis and footnote notation added.) The 1925 act had provided for the creation of water control and improvement districts pursuant to a petition of landowners. Acts 1925, 39th Leg., ch. 25, 58 10-17, at 88-89. Section 18 of the 1925 act provided in part: The county commissioners' court shall have exclusive jurisdiction to hear, consider and determine all such petitions for organization in one county . . . . Acts 1925, 39th Leg., ch. 25, 5 18, at 89. . Section 19 provided for the commissioners court granting such petition if it appeared to it that the organization of th: district was feasible and practicable and would benefit the included land or be Ita public benefit, or utility." Section 21 of the 1925 act provided in part: The State Board of Water Engineers shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine all petitions for organization of a district 1. nDistrict** was defined in the 1949 act as "an Underground Water Conservation District which includes within its purposes and plans those functions authorized by the provisions of this Section 3c.l' Subsection A, section 3c. p. 5280 Honorable Terra1 Smith - Page 3 (JM-1024) which included land in two or more counties. . . . Said board shall consider such petitions in the same manner and purpose herein provid- ed for consideration of petitions by the commissioners' court for formation of dis- tricts in one county. Acts 1925, 39th Leg., ch. 25, 5 21, at 90. It appears that the above-quoted language of subsection B of section 3c added by the 1949 act contemplated that, as with the water control and improvement districts provided for in the 1925 act, the commissioners court would have jurisdiction over the formation of underground water conser- vation districts in one county, and the State Board of Water Engineers would have jurisdiction over the formation of such districts including territory of more than one county. Sub- section C of'the 1949 act provided specifically for the con- sideration of petitions for the formation of underground water conservation districts '*by a Commissioners Court or the Board, as the case may be . . . .I' Acts 1949, 51st ch. 306, t%J (1950). g 1, at 561. &S Attorney General Opinion In 1971, the provisions of the 1925 and 1945 acts were codified as chapters 51 and 52, respectively, of the Water Code. Codification was not intended to make any substantive changes in the state water laws. m Water Code 5 1.001: Acts 1971, 62d beg., ch. 58, 5 1.001, at 110. The second sentence of subsection B of the 1949 act, quoted above, became the source of the section to which you refer in your request, section 52.022, which then provided: Except as otherwise provided by this sub- chapter, the provisions in Chapter 51 of this code for creating water control and improve- ment districts apply to the creation of un- derground water conservation districts to the extent that those provisions may be made ap- plicable. (see, Revisor's Note to section 52.022.) Chapter 51 carried forward the provisions of the 1925 act giving the commissioners court jurisdiction over the creation of water control and improvement districts in a p. 5281 . Honorable Terra1 Smith - Page 4 (JM-1024) single county, and the Texas Water Rights Commission2 juris- diction over the creation of a district encompassing terri- tory in two or more counties. &.g 09 51.016-51.022, 1971 Water Code. Similarly, chapter 52 continued to provide for the considering and granting of petitions for the creation of underground water conservation districts by either a commis- sioners court or the Texas Water Rights Commission. See 1971 Water Code 8 52.023 and 852.025 . It thus appears that under the 1971 Water Code, the commissioners court had jurisdiction over the creation of an underground water conservation district encompassing land in only one county. However, in 1973, the legislature amended chapter 52 to delete all references to the commissioners court's jurisdic- tion over the creation of underground water conservation districts. Acts 1973, 63d Leg., ch. 598, §S 1-5, at 1641. Section 52.022 was not amended at that time and continued to provide that "[elxcept as otherwise provided by this sub- chapter, the provisions of Chapter 51 of this code for creating water control and improvement districts apply to the creation of underground water conservation districts to the extent that those provisions may be made applicable.qq But sections 52.023 and 52.025 were amended as follows in pertinent pa*: Section 52.023(a) He&her Qhe commission aer-a--eemmissieners emu* may R& consider a petition for the creation of a district unless the proposed boundaries of the district are coterminous with the boundaries of an underground water reservoir or a subdivision of an underground water reservoir, as previously designated by the commission. Section 52.025 (a) If the eeaaaaissieacrs-eea*--Ed--ale commission finds that the district is feasi- ble and practicable, that it would be a benefit to land in the district, and that it would be a public benefit or utility, the 2. The duties of the Board of Water Engineers were transferred to the Texas Water Rights Commission in 1965. Acts 1965, 59th Leg., ch. 296, 5 9, at 585. p. 5282 ~1 ~.~. . K+ I Honorable Terra1 Smith - Page 5 (JM-1024) i eeauaissieaers-eeur~-Ed--~ha commission shall make these findings and grant the petition. (b) If the eeaaaaissieaars-eeurh--or--the commission finds that the district is feasi- ble and practicable, that it would not be a benefit to land in the district, that it would not be a public benefit or utility, or that it is not needed, the eemmissieaers eeurt-or-the commission shall refuse to grant the petition. The bill analysis to the 1973 act (H.B. 935) states that the act "[g]ives the Water Rights Commission exclusive authority to create a district" and VV[r]emoves from the local commissions [sic] court the authority to grant or refuse a petition for creation of a district." Indeed the key provision in chapter 51 for the granting or refusing of a petition for creation of a district is expressly inapplicable to chapter 52 underground water con- servation districts. Water Code 5 51.021(d).3 Thus, even drawing on chapter 51 provisions for purposes of creation of a chapter 52 underground water conservation district, there is no provision for a commissioners court granting or refusing a petition for creation of such a district. Section 52.025,. subsequent to the 1973 act, confers such authority only on the Texas Water Ri hts 1 Commission or its successor the Texas Water Commission. A 1985 act substantially amended chapter 52. Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 133, 59 l-6, at 617. However, we find nothing in that act reinstating the authority of the commis- sioners court with respect to the creation of underground 3. The provisions of subdivision (d) of section 51.021 first appeared in 1957. Acts 1957, 55th Leg., ch. 323, at 786. The 1957 act provided alternative procedures for the granting or refusing of a petition by a commissioners court or the Board of Water Engineers in connection with the creation of an underground water conservation district. At present, only section 52.025 provides for the granting or refusing of such a petition. Since the 1973 amendment, that section has conferred such authority only on the Texas Water Rights Commission or its successor, the Texas Water Commission. See footnote 4, infra. 4. A 1977 act created the Texas Water Commission as the successor to the Texas Water Rights Commission. Acts 1977, 65th beg., ch. 870, 5 9, at 2207. p. 5283 Honorable Terra1 Smith - Page 6 (JM-1024) water conservation districts under subchapter B of chapter 52. The act's amendment to section 52.022 was to specify that the chapter 51 provisions applied only to creation of underground water conservation districts under subchapter B or chapter 52, as the legislature added in the same bill a subchapter C providing for the creation of such districts in "critical areas." None of the provisions of subchapter B reference the commissioners cou*, in connection with creation or otherwise. The subchapter provides for the granting or refusing of a creation petition only by the commission. Water Code § 52.025. Therefore, in response to your question, we conclude that the Texas Water Commission is the only governmental body having jurisdiction over the creation of an underground water conservation district pursuant to subchapter B of chapter 52 of the Water Code. A commissioners court has no such authority. SUMMARY The Texas Water Commission is the only governmental body having jurisdiction over the creation of an underground water conser- vation district pursuant to subchapter B of chapter 52 of the Water Code. A commissioners court has no such authority. JIM MATTOX Attorney General of Texas MARYKELLER First Assistant Attorney General Lou MCCREARY Executive Assistant Attorney General JUDGE ZOLLIE STBAKLBY Special Assistant Attorney General RICK GILPIN Chairman, opinion Committee Prepared by William Walker Assistant Attorney General p. 5284