Texas law on any date › Attorney General opinions
Attorney General Opinion JM-1002
Issued January 03, 1989
Re: Authority of the Texas Higher Education Coordinat- ing Board over proprietary schools which confer only non-academic degrees, and related questions
Cites: ED §61.311, ED §61.003, ED §61.070, ED §61.304
The Attorney General's page · official PDF
January 3, 1989
Honorable Carl A. Parker
Chairman
Senate Education Committee
Texas State Senate
P. 0. BOX 12068
Austin, Texas
78711
Opinion No. JM-1002
Re: Authority of the Texas
Higher Education Coordinat-
ing Board over proprietary
schools which
confer
only
non-academic
degrees,
and
related questions (RQ-1536)
Dear Senator Parker:
You ask:
1. Does the TEA have exclusive
jurisdic-
tion over proprietary schools which
confer
only non-academic degrees,
such as AAA, AAS
and Associate of Occupational Studies ('AOS')
degrees?
2. Does the authority of the Coordinating
Board extend beyond the scope of its author-
ity under Chapter 61 of the Texas
Education
Code to proprietary schools which confer only
non-academic degrees,
such as AAA, AAS
and
AOS degrees?
If so, what
is the statutory
basis for extending
the jurisdiction of the
Coordinating
Board beyond
institutions
of
higher education?
3. If the TEA does have exclusive
juris-
diction over proprietary schools, can the TEA
abdicate its duty to supervise and regulate
proprietary schools, which has been
specifi-
cally entrusted to it by the legislature,
by
delegating such responsibility to the Coordi-
nating Board, an entity that has no express
statutory authority
for that responsibility
and that is statutorily limited
in its au-
thority solely to those matters
which
the
legislature has expressly entrusted to it?
p. 5144
Honorable Carl A. Parker - Page 2 (JM-1002)
Your request indicates that by "TEA" you mean the Texas
Education Agency,. or Central
Education
Agency, as it is
referred to by statute, and by Coordinating Board you mean
the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.
The AAA
and
AAS degrees referred
to are the Associate of Applied
Arts
and Associate of Applied Science degrees offered by certain
private educational institutions in this state.
We understand
that your request was prompted
by a
proposed agreement between
TEA and the Coordinating
Board
that such degree programs would
be subject to the require-
ments of chapter
61, subchapter G, of the Education
Code,
section 61.304 of which provides that:
[a] person may not grant or award a degree on
behalf of a private institution
of higher
education unless
the institution
has been
issued a certificate of authority to grant
the degree
by the [Coordinating
Board]
in
accordance
with
the
provisions
of
this
subchapter.
Subchapter G of chapter 61 of the Education Code was
enacted in 1975. Acts
1975, 64th Leg.,
ch. 587, at 1867.
It appears
that from the time of that
enactment in 1975
until 1981, the Coordinating Board
issued certificates
of
authority
pursuant
to subchapter
G for such associate
degrees.
In 1981, the Coordinating Board amended its admin-
istrative rules to provide that such **non-academic'N associ-
ate degree programs would no longer be under the jurisdic-
tion of the Coordinating Board, leaving proprietary
schools
offering such degrees under
the. jurisdiction of the TEA
under the Proprietary
School Act,
Education Code,
chapter
32.l
1. Section 61.311, provides:
(a) The board shall promulgate
standards,
rules, and regulations governing the issuance
of certificates of authority.
(b) The board may delegate to the commis-
sioner
such authority
and
responsibility
conferred on the board by this subchapter
as
the board deems appropriate for the effective
administration of this subchapter.
P. 5145
Honorable Carl A. Parker - Page 3 (JM-1002)
The number of schools offering such associate degrees
has apparently grown from three in 1981 to more than 25 in
1988. It is now proposed
that the Coordinating Board take
back jurisdiction over AAA and AAS programs.
Chapter 32 of the Education Code, the Texas Proprietary
School Act, provides that the TEA "shall exercise
jurisdic-
tion and control"
of proprietary
schools.
Educ.
Code
5 32.21.
"Proprietary school '1 is defined in section
32.11,
subdivision (1) as:
'Proprietary
School,'
referred
to
as
'school,' means
any business
enterprise
operated for a profit, or on a nonprofit
basis, which maintains a place of business
within
the State of Texas,
or
solicits
business within the State of Texas, and which
is not specifically exempted
by the provi-
sions of this Chapter and;
(A) which offers or maintains a course
or
courses of instruction or study: or
(B) at which
place
of business
such a
course or courses of instruction or study
is
available through classroom instruction or by
correspondence,
or both, to a person
or
persons for the purpose
of training or pre-
paring the person for a field of endeavor
in
a business, trade,
technical, or industrial
occupation, or for avocational
or personal
improvement, except as hereinafter excluded.
Subchapter G of chapter
61, section
61.304 of which
provides that degrees may not be awarded by a "private
institution of higher education" unless the institution
has
obtained a certificate
of authority
from the coordinating
board, defines "private institution of higher education"
as
follows, at section 61.302 subdivision (2):
'Private institution of higher
education'
or 'institution' means an educational
insti-
tution which:
(A) is not an
institution
of
higher
education as defined by Section 61.003(7)
of
this code:
(B) is incorporated under the laws of this
state, maintains a place of business in this
p. 5146
Honorable Carl A. Parker - Page 4 (JM-1002).
state, has a representative present in this
state, or solicits business
in this
state:
and
(c) furnishes or offers to furnish courses
of instruction
in oerson.
bv
electronic
media, or bv corresnondence
leadina
to a
decree or nrovidina
credits alleaed
to be
anolicable to a dearee.
(Emphasis added.)
"Degree" is defined in subdivision (l), section 61.302,
as
follows:
(1) 'Degree' means any title or designa-
tion, mark,
abbreviation,
appellation,
or
series of letters
or words, including
asso-
ciate, bachelor's,
master's,
doctor's,
and
their equivalents, which signifies,
purports
.to, or is generally
taken to signify
satis-
factory completion of the requirements of all
or part of a program
of study leading to an
associate, bachelor's, masterIs, or doctor's
degree or its equivalent.
(Emphasis added.)
Your questions distinguish between t'academic'*
and Won-
academic" degrees, suggesting that subchapter G, chapter
61
provisions are directed at only academic degrees.
The dis-
tinction between academic
and non-academic
degrees is not
made in the Education Code or elsewhere in applicable
Texas
statutes.
In 1981, the Coordinating Board amended its ad-
ministrative rules to make such a distinction at the time
it
relinquished its authority over applied, or non-academic,
associate degrees.
The definition of "degree,"
now in 19
T.A.C., section 5.211, was at that time narrowed to encom-
pass only degrees issued to signify completion of an "aca-
demic degree-level program."
6 Tex. Req. 1600 (1981). What
is now subsection
(c) of 19 T.A.C., section
5.213, was
amended at that
time to provide that the board would
not
accept applications for certificates of authority pertaining
to a program "not generally in use and accepted as an aca-
demic degree program."
u.
'These amendments were effective
August 7, 1981. 6 Tex. Req. 2644 (1981).
Presumably the rules limiting
Coordinating Board
au-
thority under
chapter
61 to "academic
degrees"
will
be
amended if and when
the Coordinating
Board reasserts
its
jurisdiction over non-academic associate degrees such as the
AAA and AAS degrees.
We find nothing in chapters 32 or 61
of the Education Code or other provisions of Texas law which
would prevent the board
from subjecting proprietary
school
p. 5147
Honorable Carl A. Parker - Page 5 (JM-1002)
non-academic
associate
degrees
to the requirements
of
chapter 61, once the appropriate rule changes are made.
We note that you do not ask about and we do not address
the validity of the 1981 rule changes made by the board2
or
the validity of any particular rule the Coordinating
Board
might adopt to reassert
its jurisdiction over the proprie-
tary school associate degree programs in question.
Just as Texas
statutes make no distinction
between
academic and non-academic
degrees, no distinction is made
between associates degrees which are llapplied,lt
such as the
AAA and AAS degrees, or not "applied."
The definition
of
degree in chapter 61 encompasses any "degree" having in its
designation the word "associate."
The legislature evidenced its concern that the use
of
such a designation
be regulated by the Coordinating
Board
"to prevent
deception
of the public
resulting
from the
conferring and use of fraudulent or substandard college
and
university degrees."
Educ. Code 5 61.301. We do not think
that the fact that a school is a proprietary school,
which
may not be a college or university
in the ordinary
sense,
supports the conclusion that it is not the sort of institu-
tion at which
chapter 61 is directed, if the school
fits
within the definition
of a "private
institution of higher
education," chapter 61, on its face, makes
it subject
to
board control vis a vis its awarding of degrees.
Your request and a brief submitted in connection
with
your request by a law firm representing the Texas Associa-
tion of Private
Schools argue that section
61.070 of the
Education Code
indicates that the Coordinating
Board was
granted no statutory
jurisdiction over proprietary
schools
awarding applied
associate
degrees.
Section
61.070 pro-
vides:
None of the duties or functions
assigned
by statute to the central education
agency,
2. But see
subsection
(b)
of
section
61.311
authorizing
the
board
to
delegate
subchapter
G
responsibilities to the Commissioner of Education, who
is
executive officer of the TEA pursuant to sections 11.51 et
sec(. of the Education Code.
The text of section 61.311 is
reprinted in footnote 1 of this opinion.
P. 5148
Honorable Carl A. Parker - Page'6 (JM-1002)
except
those
relating
to public
junior
colleges, are affected by this chapter.
However, we find no statute, either in the Proprietary
School Act or elsewhere, which assigns the duty or function
to the TEA of authorizing proprietary
schools
to grant
particular
degrees.
The administrative
rules
discussed
above might have been adopted with the intention of relin-
quishing such duties or functions to the TEA, but those
rules are not
*!statutes" within the meaning
of section
61.070.
Briefs submitted in connection
with your request
also
argue that Attorney General Opinion M-143 (1967) distinguis-
hed academic
and non-academic
degrees or certificates
in
concluding that a state
law requiring students to complete
American history and government courses in order to obtain a
"baccalaureate" or "lesser degree or academic
certificate"
did not apply
to Wocational
or technical course
certifi-
cates given for courses approved
by or subject to approval
of the State
Board
of Vocational
Education."
Attorney
General Opinion M-143
(1967), at 7. However, we do not find
in that opinion any authority for making such distinctions
among *8deqrees1'
under
chapter 61. The definition of
"de-
gree" in section 61.302 makes no such distinction.
Notably,
the provisions of chapter 61 were
not enacted until
eight
years after the issuance of Attorney General Opinion M-143.
Accordingly, we conclude
in response
to your
first
question that the TEA does. not have exclusive
jurisdiction
over proprietary
schools which
confer
only non-academic
degrees such as AAA, AAS,. and Associate
of Occupational
Studies Degrees.
Where a proprietary school, as defined
in
section 32.11 of the Education
Code, also fits the defini-
tion of a "private institution of higher education"
under
section 61.302, we think that it is subject to the reguire-
ment of chapter 61, that it may not award degrees until
it
has been issued a certificate of authority by the Coordinat-
ing Board to grant such degrees, including applied associate
degrees.
your second
question
asks whether
the
Coordinating
Board's authority extends beyond the scope of its authority
under chapter
61 to proprietary schools which offer
such
degrees.
We
find that the Coordinating
Board has
such
authority under ChaDter
61 itself pursuant to the provisions
of that chapter cited
and discussed above.
Though
such
schools may
fit the definition
of "proprietary
schoolsl'
under chapter
32, to the extent that they also
fit the
definition of "private
institutions of higher
education"
I
P. 5149
Honorable Carl A. Parker - Page 7 (JM-1002)
under chapter 61, they are subject to the requirement
of
that chapter
providing
that they may not award
degrees
unless they have been issued a certificate of authority
by
the Coordinating Board. Educ. Code § 61.304.
Your third question assumes that the TEA has
exclusive
authority over proprietary schools. As we have concluded in
our responses to your first two questions that the TEA does
not have exclusive authority over those proprietary
schools
that are also "private
institutions of higher
education"
within the meaning
of chapter 61, section 61.302, we need
not answer your third question.
SUMMARY
Proprietary schools which
offer
applied
associate degrees
and which
otherwise
meet
the definition
of "private
institutions
of
higher education" under
Education Code sec-
tion 62.302 are subject to the requirement of
section 61.304 that they may not award
such
degrees without having obtained a certificate
of authority from the Texas Higher
Education
Coordinating Board.
, ve-l/zyh
JIM
MATTOX
Attorney General of Texas
MARY KELLER
First Assistant Attorney General
LOU MCCREARY
Executive Assistant Attorney General
JUDGE ZOLLIE STEAXLEY
Special Assistant Attorney General
RICK GILPIN
Chairman, Opinion Committee
Prepared by William Walker
Assistant Attorney General
p. 5150
Attorney General opinions are persuasive, not binding on courts, and answer questions of law, not fact. Text extracted from the official PDF. Not legal advice.