Texas law on any date › Attorney General opinions
Attorney General Opinion JM-0804
Issued October 02, 1987
Re: Whether amendments to the P. 0. Box 12786 Texas Housing Agency Act and Austin, Texas 78711 the Texas Finance Corporations Act concerning housing for the elderly apply to refunding bonds
Cites: GV §394.011, GV §394.902, GV §49, GV §at, GV §34
The Attorney General's page · official PDF
October 2, 1987
Mr. 0. P. (Bob) Bobbitt
Opinion
No. JM-804
Executive
Director
Texas Department
on Aging
Re:
Whether
amendments
to the
P. 0. Box 12786
Texas Housing
Agency Act
and
Austin,
Texas
78711
the Texas Finance
Corporations
Act concerning
housing
for the
elderly
apply
to
refunding
bonds
Dear Mr. Bobbitt:
you inquire about the scape of
the 1985 amendments
to
the Texas
Housing Agency
Act, article
12691-6,
V.T.C.S.,
and the
Texas Finance
Corporations
Act,
Local Government
Code, chapter
394 (formerly
codified
as
article
12,691-7,
V.T.C.S.).
Senate
Bill No.
969 of
the.69th
Legislature
added orovisions
to each
act reouirina
the
reservation
of
space for elderly persons
in specified-housing
financed
by bond
issuances
under
either act.
69th Leg., ch. 650, at 2399.
You wish to know
requirement
applies
to
refunding
bonds issued
statutes.
developments
Acts 1985,
whether
this
under these
The
Texas
Housing
Agency
is
authorized
to
make
mortgage
loans to private
entities
to
help finance
low and
moderate
income
housing
developments.
V.T.C.S.
art.
12691-6,
559, 10.
The board of
directors
has authority
to
issue revenue
bonds to finance mortgage
loans.
Id. 521(b);
see also 5921(a);
48 (authority
to issue general
obligation
bonds contingent
on adoption
of constitutional
amendment).
Any
bonds
issued
by
the
agency
may
be
refunded,
or
otherwise
refinanced,
by
the issuance
of
refunding
bonds.
Id. 534.
The following
provision
was
added by Senate Bill
No. 696 in 1985:
Sec. 10A.
(a)
The
agency
shall
adopt
rules to achieve
occupancy
of at least
five
percent
of
the
units
in
a
multifamily
housing
development
by elderly
individuals
of low
income
or
by families
of
low
or
moderate
income
in
which
an
elderly
individual
is head
of the household.
This
provision
annlies
onlv
to
a
multifamilv
housina
develooment
that
contains
at
least
p. 3804
Mr. 0. P. (Bob) Bobbitt
- Page 2 (JM-804)
20 units
and is financed
bv
bonds
issued
under this Act.
(Emphasis added.)
V.T.C.S.
art. 12691-6,
§lOA(a).
A similar provision
appears
in the "Texas Housing
Fin-
ance Corporations
Act."
Local
Gov*t Code
0394.902.
The
act is also
directed
at increasing
the amount
of housing
available
to
persons
of
low and
moderate
income.
Local
Gov't Code
5394.002.
It
authorizes
local
governments
to
approve
the formation
of public nonprofit
housing
finance
corporations
with
power
to
issue
bonds
to
assist
fin
financing
residential
ownership
and development
for persons
-of low
and
moderate
income.
&
§§394.011;
394.012;
394.032(a) (4); 394.037.
Section
394.902 provides
in part:
(a)
The
housing
finance
corporation
shall require that at least five percent
of
the
units
in
a
multifamily
residential
development
be
built
or renovated
and
be
reserved
for the lifetime
of the development
for occupancy
by
elderly
persons
of
low
income or
by families
of low
or
moderate
income in
which an
elderly person
is
the
head of a household
if the development:
(1)
contains
at least 20 units: and
(2)
is financed
by bonds issued under
this chapter
as a
result of an
official
decision
to issue bonds that occurs on or
after January
1, 1986.
Instead
of
requiring
a
reservation
of
units
for
the
elderly,
a housing
finance corporation
may collect
a fee
from
the
person
who
receives
a
loan
for
residential
development
and remit
the fee to
the Texas
Department
on
Aging.
Local
Gov't
Code
0394.902(b).
Housing
Finance
Corporations,
like the Texas Housing Agency,
have authority
to issue refunding
bonds.
&
5394.037(b).
You ask whether
the required
reservation
of space for
the elderly
applies to a housing development
financed
under
either act by the issuance of bonds
prior to the effective
date of the requirement
and refinanced
after the effective
date through
the
issuance
of
refunding
bonds.
Under the
Housing
Finance
Corporation
Act, this
requirement
applies
only if a development
contains
at least 20 units and it
iS
financed
by
bonds
issued . . . as
a
result of
an
official
decision
to
issue
p:3805
Mr. 0. P. (Bob) Bobbitt
- Page 3 (JM-804)
bonds that
occurs on
or after
January
1,
1986.
(Emphasis added.)
Local
Gov't
Code
5394.902(a)(2).
The
development
is
"financed"
by the original
bond issuance,
which provides
a
fund to
pay development
costs.
This
is the
time to
apply design
appropriate
requirements,
when
funds are
first
made available
for a project.
The issuance
of refunding
bonds extends
the
time for
paying an existing
debt
previously
funded by a
bond issu-
ante.
m
Citvof
Lona Beach v. Lisenby,
179 P. 198 (Cal.
1919); Lee
v. Hancock
County
178
So. 790
(Miss. 1938).
Refunding
bonds do not create Aew debt, but merely continue
existing
debt.
Dallas Countv
v. Lockhart,
96 S.W.Zd
60
(Tex. 1936).
Refinancing
a
debt by issuance
of refunding
bonds
continues
the
original
financing,
but
does
not
provide
the developer
with more funds
to perform
the work.
See aenerallv
Du
Ouesnav v. Henderson,
74 P.2d
294 (Cal.
APP. 1937): Collector
of Revenue v. Mossler~Accentance
Co.,
139 So.2d 263 (La. App. 1962) (defining
"refinancing").
Since the
issuance
of
refunding
bonds
under chapter
394 of the Local Government
Code merely extends
an existing
obligation
and existing
financing,
we
believe
the reserva-
tion of
space for
elderly persons
under section
394.902
does not become applicable
when a development
is refinanced
by the
issuance
of
refunding
bonds.
The requirement
is
applicable
to the
provision
of
original
financing
by the
issuance
of bonds on
or after January
1,
1986.
Where the
original
bonds
were
issued
prior
to
that
date,
the
development
is not subject to
the reservation
requirement,
even if refunding
bonds
are issued after that
date.
This
reasoning
and
conclusion
also apply
to
the issuance
of
refunding
bonds under the Texas Housing Agency Act.1
1.
As amended
in 1985, article
12671-6, V.T.C.S.,
was
also subject
to the
elderly reservation
requirement
only
with respect
to
housing
developments
financed
by
bonds
issued as a result
of an official
decision
to issue bonds
that occurred
on or after January
1,
1986.
m
Acts 1985,
69th Leg., ch. 650,
510, at 2403.
The
limitation
was re-
pealed by the Local Government
Code
adopted
in 1987.
Acts
1987, 70th Leg., ch. 149, §49(3), at 2397.
This limitation
was a
transitional
provision
applicable
to
transactions
occurring
while it was in effect.
See Lanaever
v. Miller,
76 S.W.2d 1025 (Tex. 1934): State v.
Steck Co., 236 S.W.Zd
866 (Tex. Civ. App. - Austin
1951,
writ ref'd).
Since the
time for pre-1986
transactions
has
elapsed,
the limitation
no longer needs to be included
in the statute.
p. 3806
Mr. 0. P. (Bob) Bobbitt
- Page 4
(JH-804)
Article
12691-6, V.T.C.S.,
also includes
the following
provision:
Bonds issued by
the agency
also may
be
refunded
in the manner provided
by any other
applicable
statute,
including
. . .
(Articles
717k
and 717k-3,
Vernon's
Texas
Civil Statutes).
V.T.C.S.
art. 12691-6,
§34 (4.
Articles
717k
and 717k-3,
V.T.C.S.,
provide
full
authority
to refund
bonds.
Re-
funding of bonds under these statutes
would not be subject
to the
requirement
in
section
10A of
article
12691-6,
V.T.C.S.,
of
reserving
space
for
the
elderly.
It
is
therefore
apparent
that the legislature
did
not intend the
issuance
of refunding
bonds
to subject the
development
to
the section
10A requirement.
SU
M M A R Y
The refinancing
of a housing
development
by issuance
of refunding
bonds under article
12691-6,
V.T.C.S.,
the Texas Housing
Agency
Act, or chapter
394 of the Local
Government
Code, the
Texas
Finance
Corporation
Act,
does not impose upon the housing
development
the requirement
that space
be reserved
in
the development
for elderly occupants.
MARY KELLER
Executive
Assistant
Attorney
General
JUDGE ZOLLIE STEAKLEY
Special Assistant
Attorney
General
RICK GILPIN
Chairman,
Opinion
Committee
Prepared
by Susan L. Garrison
Assistant
Attorney
General
p. 3807
Attorney General opinions are persuasive, not binding on courts, and answer questions of law, not fact. Text extracted from the official PDF. Not legal advice.