Texas law on any date › Attorney General opinions
Attorney General Opinion JM-0655
Issued March 25, 1987
Cites: TX §130.121, TX §6.27, TX §6.23, TX §6.22, TX §130.004, TX §130.091
The Attorney General's page · official PDF
TEE
ATTORNEY
GESERAL
OF
TEXAS
March 25, 1987
Mr. Kenneth 8. Ashworth
Coamissioner
Coordinating
Board
Texas College
and University
system
P. 0. Box 12788
Austin,
Texas
78711
Opinion
No. JM-655
lb:
Whether a county that aesesses
and
collects
taxes
for a community
college
district
may add a 2% fee
Dear Mr. Ashworth:
You ask the folloving
question:
Under Texas law, may a county that assesses
and
collects
taxes
for
a community college
district
charge no more than two percent
of the ad valorem
taxes
asscssed
as a fc’L for
tax
assesmnent
and
collection?
You
are
concerned
specifically
about the
Alamo Community College
District.
See Educ.. Code 1130.005.
junior
college
district
it
is.
You do not specify
the type of
We conclude
that,
pursuant
to section
6.27 of the Tax Code, a county is entitled
to a reasonable
fee,
not to
exceed
the actual
costs
incurred.
for those junior
college
districts,
other
than
joint
county
junior
college
districts,
for
which
it
sssesses
and collects
taxs8.
If a county assesses
and collects
taxes
for
a
joint county
junior
college
district,
it
shall
receive
compensation
in an amount agreed upon betveen
the parties.
but not to
exceed
two percent
of
the
ad valoren
taxes
assessed,
as provided
in
section
130.121(c)
of the Education
Code.
Your question
arises
because
of a perceived
conflict
between one
section
of
the Education
Code.
section
130.121,
and several
sections
of
the Tax Code.
Section
130.121
of
the Education
Code governs
tax
assessment
and
collection
for
junior
college
districts,
regional
college
districts.
and jolnt
county
junior collect
districts
and
provides
the following:
1130.121.
Tax Assessment
and Collection
(a)
The governing
board of each junior
college
district.
and each regional
college
district,
for
p. 2983
Mr. Kenneth H. Ashworth - Page 2
(JIl-655)
and on behslf
of
its
junior
college
division,
annually
shall
cause
the taxable
property
in its
district
to be assessed
for
ad valorem
taxation
and the ad valorem
taxes
in the
district
to be
collected,
in
accordance
with
soy
one
of
the
methods set
forth
in this
section,
and any method
sdopted
shall
remain In effect
until
changed by
the board.
(b)
Each governing
board
shsll
be authorized
to
have
the
taxable
property
In
its
district
assessed
and/or
its
taxes
collected.
in
whole
or in
part,
by
the
tsx
sssess0rs
sndlor
tax
collectors,
respectively,
of
any
county.
city,
taxing
district,
or other
governmental
subdivision
in vhich
all
or any part
of
the junior
college
district
is
located.
(c)
Tba
governing
board
of
a
joint
county
unlor
college
district
shall
be
authorized
to
have the taxable
nronertv
in its
district
assessed
or its
taxes
collected.
in whole or in part,
by
the tax sssessors
or tax collectors,
respectively,
of
any county.
city,
taxing
district,
or
other
governmental
subdivision
in which all
or any part
of
the
joint
county
funior
college
district
is
located.
The tax sssessors
or tax collectors
of a
governments1
subdivision,
on the
rcquest.of
the
governing
board
of
a joint
county
junior
college
district.
shall
assess
and collect
the
taxes
of
the Joint
county
junior
college
district
In the
manner prescribed
in the Property
Tax Code.
Tax
sssossors
and tar
collectors
shall
receive
c=
peasatioa
In
sn
amount
agreed
on
betveen
the
appropriate
parties,
but not to exceed NO percent
of
the
ad
valorem
tsxes
assessed.
(Emphasis
added).
Section
6.27(b)
of the Tax Code governs
compensation
for
sssess-
ment and collection
and provides
the folloving:
(b)
The county
assessor-collector
is
entitled
to
a
reasonable
fee,
which
may
not
exceed
the actual
costs incurred,
for assessing
and
collecting
taxes
for
a taxfng
unit
pursuant
to
Subdivisions
(1)
through
(3)
of Subsection
(a) of
Section
6.23 of this
code.
(Emphasis added).
p.
2984’
L
Mr. Kenneth Ii. Ashworth - Page 3
(JM-655)
Section
6.23(a)(3)
of the Tax Code sets
forth
duties
imposed upon
assessors
and collectors
and provides
in pertinent
part:
(a)
‘The county assessor-collector
shall
assess
sod collect
tsxes
oo property
in the
county
for
the stste
sod
the
county.
He shall
also
sssess
sud collect
taxes
on property
for
mother
taxing
unit if:
.
.
.
.
(3)
the
governing
body of
the unit requires
the
county
to
sssess
and collect
its
tsxes
as
provided
by Subsection
(c) of Section
6.22 of this
code.
. . .
(Emphasis added).
Junior
college
districts
are
governed
by
chapter
130 of
the
Education
Code.
Section
130.004
details
the
authorized
types
of
public
junior
colleges
and provides
the folloving
in pertinent
part:
(a)
By complying
with
the' provisions
of
the
appropriate
following
sections
of
this
chapter
a
public
junior
college
and/or
district
of
any one
of
the
following
classifications
may be
esta-
blished:
(1)
an independent
school
district
junior
college;
(2)
a city
junior
college:
(3)
a union junior
college;
(4)
a county junior
college;
(5)
s joint-county
junior
college;
and
(6)
s
public
junior
college
as
s
part
or divfsion
of
s
regional
college
district.
[Aote:
Sections
130.091
to
130.109
governing
the creation
of regions1
college
districts
were
repealed
by Acts 1985. 69th Leg.,
ch. 302, 13.1
(Emphasis added).
Subchapter
C of
chapter
130 of the EducPtion Code sets
forth
the
fiscal
provisioos
applicable
to
the various
types
of
junior
college
districts
and contains
sections
130.121,
the section
vith
vhlch
you
are
concerned,
to
130.124.
Prior
to its
amendment in 1977.
section
130.121 provided
at subsection
(d) that
p. 2985
Ur. Kemcth 8. Ashworth - Page 4
(JH-655)
_(e]ach governing
board shall
be suthorized
to have
the taxable
property
in its
district
assessed.
its
values
equalized,
sod/or
its
taxes
collected,
fn
whole or in part,
by the tax assessors.
board[s]
of
aqualitation.
and/or
tax collectors,
respectively,
of
any
county,
city.
taxing
district,
or
other
goveruxeatsl
subdivision
in which all
or say part
of
the
junior
college
district
is
located.
. . .
Such property
shall
be asscseed,
the values
thereof
equslised,
&d
such taxes
collected,
in the msnner
and for
such compensation
so shall
be agreed upon
between
the approprfate
parties.
. . .
(Emphasis
Added).
In 1977,
subsection
(d)
was retained
and subsection
(g)
was added.
Subsection
(g) provided
in pertinent
psrt
that
Jt]he
governing
board
of
s
joint
county
junior
college
district
shall
be mthorized
to
have the
taxable
oropertv
in
its
district
sssessed.
its
values
equal&dw,
or its
taxes
collected.
in -whole
or
in
part,
by
the
tax
assessors.
boards
of
equalization,
or tax
collectors,
respectively,
of
soy county,
city,
taxing
district.
or other
govern-
mental subdivision
In vhich
all
or any part of the
ioint
count3
iocated.
. . :
iunlor
collese
district
is
T&I sssessors
&d
tax
collectors
shall
receive
compensation
in sn amount agreed upon
between the appropriate
parties,
but not to exceed
tvo
percent
of
the
ad
val‘orem
taxes
assessed.
(Emphasis added).
Acts
1977.
65th
Leg.,
ch.
198.
IL,
at
563.
Section
130.121
was
amended to reed
in its
present
form.
however,
In the same bill
that
enacted
the Property
Tax Code, with subsection
(g) becoming subsection
(cl.
Acts
1979, 66th Leg.,
ch. 841,
34(k).
at 2320.
A ststute
should
be construed
in
such
s way so
that
it
till
harmonize
with
other
l
xlstiug
laws.
unleecl
its
provisions
clearly
manifest
s
contrary
ioteutloo.
Freels
v.
Walker.
26 S.W.Zd
627.
opinion
sdopted
(Tax.
1930);
Stste z
S.W.Zd 825 (Tax. Civ.
App. - I
Ace1 Delivery
Semlce,
Inc..
380
Dallas 1964))
rev'd
ou other grounds,
388
el ststutes
should be read
S.W.Zd 930 (Tax.
1965).
General
and speck
together
sod harmonized.
if
it
is
possible.
Iialscll
v. Texas Water
Coam~ission.
380 S.W.Zd 1 (Tax.
Civ.
App. - Austin
1964,
writ
ref'd
n.r.e.);
Conley
v.
Dsughter's
of
the Republic,
156 S.W.
197 (Tex.
1913).
Because
we sra
required
to
construe
both
provisions
har-
moniously
If
such a constructiou
is possible,
we construe
subsection
(c) of section
130.121 of the Education
Code to create
an exception
to
p. 2986
Hr. Kenneth H. Ashvorth - Page 5
(JM-655)
the
general
provisions
regarding
compensation
for
assessment
and
collection
for taxes set out in section
6.27 of the Tax Code.
Accordingly,
we conclude
that,
pursuant
to
section
6.27
of
the
Tax Code,
a county
is
entitled
to s reasonable
fee.
not
to
exceed
actual
costs
incurred,
for those junior
college
districts.
other
thsn
joint
county
junior
college
districts,
for
vhich
it
sssesses
and
collects
taxes.
If
a county sssesses
and collects
taxes
for
s joint
county
junior
college
district,
it
shall
receive
compensation
in an
amount agreed upon between the parties.
but not to exceed
two percent
of the ad valorem taxes assessed,
as provided
in section
130.121(c)
of
the Education Code.
SUUUARY
Pursuant
to section
6.27 of
the Tax Code. s
county
is
entitled
to’ a reasonable
fee.
not
to
exceed
actual
costs
incurred,
for those
junior
college
districts.
other
than joint
county junior
college
districts,
for
which
it
assesses
and
collects
tsxes.
If s county sssesses
and collects
tsxes
for
a joint
county junior
college
district,
it
shall
receive
compensation
in an amount agreed
upon between
the parties.
but. not
to
exceed
two
percent
of
the
ad valorem
taxes
assessed.
as
provided
in
section
130.121(c)
of
the
Education
Code.
Very s
ruly yours An _
AL
/I-
J. I M
MATTOX
Attorney
General of Texas
JACK EIGRTOWER
First
Assistant
Attorney
General
UARY FLELLER
Executive
Assistant
Attorney
General
RICK GILPIN
Chairman, Opinion Committee
Prepared by Jim Moellinger
Assistant
Attorney
General
p. 2987
Attorney General opinions are persuasive, not binding on courts, and answer questions of law, not fact. Text extracted from the official PDF. Not legal advice.