Texas law on any date › Attorney General opinions
Attorney General Opinion JM-0499
Cites: TX §6.01j, TX §Il.45, TX §6
The Attorney General's page · official PDF
.
JIM MAl-fOX
Attorney General
Supreme Cowl Suildlng
P. 0. Box 12548
Austin, TX. 75711. 2549
512l4752501
Telex 9lWS74.1357
Tdecooier 512147M255
714 Jackson, Suits 700
Dsllsr. TX. 752024505
2lu742-8944
4524 Alberta Ave.. Suite 150
El Paso. TX. 799C52793
915633.3454
11 Texas. Suite 700
,us,on. TX. 77002.3111
7lY223.3886
806 Broadway. Suite 312
Lubbock. TX. 794014479
5Q5i747.5235
4309 N. Tenth. Suite S
McAllen. TX. 78501-1695
51Y682-4547
2Qo Main Plrra. Suite 4M)
Ssn Antonio. TX. 782052797
5121225.4191
An Equal OppoRuni!yl
Affirmative Actton Employef
The Attorney
General of Texas
June 6, 1986
Hr. Sam ii. Smith
Executive
Director
Board of Tax Profenaiional
Examiners
P. 0. Box 15920
Austin.
Texas
78’161
Opinion Ac. JM-499
Rr: Play one individual,
cons.ister.tly
vith
article
XVI, section
40, of the
Texas
Constitution,
serve
as
chief
appraiser
in three
different
apprai-
sal
districts
and
simultaneously
.as tax
assessor-collector
in
three
school
districts
and a vater
control
and improvement district
Dear Mr.
Smith:
YOU
InfOtUi 11s that
one
individual
has
been
hired
as
chief
appraiser
by three
boards
of
directors
of
appraisal
districts.
Be
serves
as chief
appraiser
of
Hudspeth County Appraisal
District,
of
Presidio
County
Afpraisal
District,
and of Jeff
Davis County Appraisal
District.
He
also
serves
as
Tax
Assessor-Collector
for
Anthony
Independent
School
District,
San Elizario
Independent
School
District,
and Socorro
Independent
School
District,
and for
the
For:
Haxcck
Water Control
and l~mprovement District.
Tou ask vhe.:her
this
individual
is
prevented
by
article
XVI,
section
40 of the Texas Constitution
from holding
some or all
of these
seven positions.
Article
XVI,
section
40 of
the Texas
Constitution
prohibits
one pe~‘son from holding
or exercising
more than one civil
office
of
emolument at
the
same time.
Thus,
we need
to
cons:Zer
whether any of
the positions
held
by this
Individual
constitutes
a
“civil
office
of
emolument”
within
this
provision.
This
question
turns on the power and responsibility
which the lav has assigned
to
each position.
Considerations
as to whether
one individual
has
encugh
time to perform
al.1 such responsibilities
are
not
relevant
to article
XVI, section
40.
A chief
appraiser
and
a tax
assessor-collector
are
appointed
under the
taxing
provisions
enacted
by the
legislature
pursuant
to
article
VIII,
section
18 of
the Texas Constitution.
This
const itu-
tional
provision
s:tetes
in part:
(b)
A single
appraisal
within
each
county
of
all
property
subject
to ad valorem taxation
by the
p.
2289
Xr. Sam II. Smith - Page 2 (Jl4-499)
.
county and all
other
taxing
units
located
therein
shall
be provided
by general
law.
. . .
.
. .
.
(d)
The Lcgisaature
shall
prescribe
by general
lav
the
methods,
timing,
and
administrative
process
for
implementing
the requirements
of
this
section.
Tex.
Const.
art.
VIII,
5I.S.
The quoted
provisions
were
added
to
article
VIII,
section
16, by amendment in 1980.
See H.J.R.
No. 98,
-
91, Acts
1979, 66th Leg..
8.t 3229.
The Property
Tax Code.
codified
as
Title
I
of
the
Tax Code,
contains
the
statutes
vhiclr implement article
VIII,
section
18, of the
Texas
Constitution.
An appraisal
district
Is
established
in
each
county
and
given
respons,lbility
for
appraising
property
in
the
district
of each taxing
unit
that imposes ad valorem taxes on property
within
the
district.
Tax Code
56.01.
“Taxing
unit”
includes
a
county,
a city,
a school
district,
and a district
created
under the
Water Code.
Tax Code 51.04(12).
The appraisal
district
is
governed
by
a board
of
five
dirc:c,tors.
Tax Code
16.03(s).
The board
of
directors
is required
to establish
an appraisal
office
and to appoint
as chief
administrator
of
the appraisal
office
a chief
appraiser
who
serves
at the pleasure
of the board.
Tax Code 56.05.
A chief
appraiser
has numerous ministerial
functions
necessary
to
performing
the district’!;
duty to appraise
property.
See.
e.g.,
Tax
Code $11.44,
125.01.
See also Attorney
General Opinion MW-450 (1982).
---
The chief
appraiser
submits a proposed
budget to the district
board of
directors,
subject
to the: board’s
power to amend it and give
it
final
approval.
Tax Code §6.01j,
Re may employ and compensate personnel
as
provided
in the budget.
Tax Code 16.05(d).
Attorney
General
Opinion
JN-72
(1983)
determined
that
the
chief
appraiser
was an “officer”
within
the nepotism
statute,
article
5996a.
V.T.C.S..
because
he had
authority
to employ perwunel.
This opinion
did not determine
whether
the chief
appraiser
was a.n officer
under article
XVI, section
40.
of
the
Texas
Constitution.
See
also
Attorney
General
Opinion
W-450
(1982).
The chief
apprs.iser
may delegate
authority
to his
employees.
Tax Code 56.05(e).
He has some respowibility
to determine
a taxpayer’s
right
to tax
exemptions.
Section
Il.45
of the Tax Code provides
in part:
(a)
The
chief
appraiser
shall
determine
separately
eas:h applicant’s
right
to an exemption.
After consider-ing
the application
and all
relevant
p. 2290
* .
nr.
Sam 11. Smith
- Peg. 3
(*RI-499)
,
information,
the
chief
appraiser
shall,
as the law
and facts
warrant:
(1)
approve
the application
and allow
the
exemption;
(2)
modify
the
exemption
applied
for
and
allow the exemnt.lon as modified;
(3)
disapp::ove
the application
and request
additional
informatioo
from
the
applicant
In
support of the claim:
or
(4)
deny the application.
(c)
The
chief
appraiser
shall
determine
the
validity
of
each application
for
exemption
filed
with him before
he submits
the appraisal
records
for
review
and
determination
of
protests
as
provided
by Chspc:e:r 41 of
this
code.
He has
similar
authority
to
determine
whether individuals
are
entitled
to have property
;lppraised
according
to the special
appraisal
provisions
codified
in ch.,pter
23 of
the Tax Code.
See,
e.g.,
Tax
Code
523.44
(agricultural
use
designation
.of
land);
523.57
(agricultural
land);
523.79 (timber
land);
523.85 (recreational,
park,
and scenic
land).
he has #authority
to “establish
procedures
for
the
equitable
and uniform appraisal
of
inventory
for
taxation.”
Tax Code
523.12.
Chapter
41 of
the T,ax Code provides
that
the appraisal
review
board
vi11
review the chief
appraiser’s
records
acd determine
taxpayer
protests.
See.
e.g.,
Tax Code 5941.01,
41.41.
The appraisal
review
board
consists
of
three
wmbers
cppointed
for
two year
terms by the
appraisal
district
board
of
directors.
Tax Code 56.41.
Members of
the district
board may not serve
on the
appraisal
revies
board.
The
beard
examines
the appraisal
records
to
determine
vhether
(1)
the
appraisals
are substantially
uniform;
(2)
an exemption is
improperly
granted;
(3)
land is
improperly
granted
a special
appraisal;
or (4)
the records
do not
conform to the
requirements
of
lav
in any ocher
respect.
Tax Code
541.01.
A
taxing
unit
ray
challenge
various
aspects
of the appraisal
before
the appraisal
review board.
Tax Code
g41.03.
The chief
appraiser
Is
required
to
make the appraisals
and
other
corrections
ordered
by
the
appraisal
reviev
board.
Tax Code
541.08.
p.
2291
Mr. Sam A. Smith - Psgr
5
(~14-499)
Property
owners
may
protest
to
the appraisal
reviev
board
any
determination
of
the chief
,spprriser
vhich
adverse!y
affects
then.
including
denisl
of
an exemption
or determirwion
that land does
not
qualify
for special
appraisal
as land
designated
for agricultural
use,
agricultural
land,
or timber
land.
Tax Code 541.41.
See Brooks
v.
Bachus, 661 S.W.Zd 288 (Tex.
App. - Eastland
1983, writ rcf’d
n.r.e.).
The
chief
appraiser
represents
the appraisal
office
at
each protest
hearing.
Tax Code 141.45(c).
If
the
board
finds
that
the
appraisal
records
are incorrect
ic sow
respect
raised
by the protest,
it
makes
the necessary
changes in tht: records.
Tax Code 141.L7.
Based on
this
examinrtion
of
the
chief
appraiser’s
statutory
authority,
ve conclude
that
he is not an officer
vlthin
article
XVVI,
section
40 of
the Texas Constitution.
The determining
factor
which
distinguishes
a public
ofiicer
from
an employee
is
“whether
any
sovereign
function
of the government is conferred
upon the individual
to
be
exercised
by
him
for
the
benefit
of
the
public
largely
independent
of
the
contrcl
of
others.”
Aldine
Independent
School
District
v. Standley,
280 j.W.Zd 578,
583 (Tex.
1955);
see also
Green
v. Stevart,
516 S.W.2d 133 (Tex.
1974);
Dunbar v. graxorla
County=
S.W.Zd ‘738
(Tex.
Civ.
App. - Galveston
1949.
vrit
raf’d);
but see,
Pruitt
v. Glen Rose Independent
School
District.
86 S.W.td
1004 (Tex.
1935) effectively
overruled
by Green v.
Stevart,
supra.
Some of his
responsibilities
derive
d:lrectly
from statute
and not by delegation
from the board of d1rector.s.
Re exercises
some initial
discretion
in
tk,e area of
tax exemptlow
end special
valuations.
Nonetheless,
he
exercises
his
appraisal
functions
subject
to reviev
and correction
by
the
appraisal
reviev
board,
and he serves
at
the pleasure
of
the
appraisal
board of direct’,%.
The appraisal
functions
conferred
upon
him are not exercised
“la,cgely
independent
of the control
of others.”
Aldine Inxpendent
School District
v. Standley,
w.
The chief
appraiser
does have
authority
to hire employees,
vithin
the
limits
of the budget
imposed by the board of directors.
For this
reason,
he
is
an “of f%:er”
vithln
the
Nepotism
Act,
art.
5996a.
V.T.C.S. ;
Attorney
General
Opinion
J?l-72
(1983).
The
statutory
definition
of “officer”
g:ven
in the Nepotism Act is not
necessarily
identical
with
the
definitdon
of
officer
applicable
to article
XVI,
section
40 of
the Texas Constitution.
See
Attorney
General
Opinion
JM-72
(1963);
Letters
Mvisory
Ros.
156,
152 (1978).
The chief
appraiser
needs to hire G:mployees to carry out his primary function
of
apprti,sing
property,
vhl,ch is
exercised
subject
to
the
control
and
supervision
of
others.
Although
he has some independence
in
hiring
decisions,
this
paver is incidental
to and subordinate
to his
primary
role
as
agent
and
employee
of
the
appraisal
district
board
of
directors.
The chief
zppraiser
does
not,
in
our opinion,
hold
an
office
within
article
XVI, section
&O of the Texas Constitution.
This
provision
therefore
does not prohibit
one person from serving
as chief
appraiser
of three different
appraisal
districts.
p. 2292
8,. I
nr.
Sam R.
Smith
-
Page
5
(JM-499)
We next
look
to
thd: responsibilities
of
the
tax
assassot-
collector
of a school
distr,ict
and of
a water
control
and improvement
district:
The Tu Coda defines
“asses8or”
as
the officer
or
employee
responsible
for
assessing
property
taxes
as provided
by Chaptcr
2b of
this
code
for
a taxi>p
unit
by whatever
title
he
Is
designated.
(Eml)hasis added).
Tax Code 11.04(14).
“Collector”
is defiwi
as
the
officer
or
employee responsible
for collecting
property
taxes
for
a taxing
unit by whatever title
he is designated.
(Emphasis added).
Tax Code 51.04(15).
The Tax Code direct);
US to
look
to
the
lav
creating
a school
district
or a water distr:.ct
to determine
vho shall
assess
and collect
taxes
for
it.
Tax Code! 16.2?(a).
The board
of
trustees
of
an
independent
school
distrlc:t
may appoint
aI: assessor-collector
of taxes
for
the district,
for
a term not
to exceed
three
(3)
years.
Educ .
Code 123.93(a).
See alsc, Tax Code 1$6.22(c);
6.23(a)(3)
(taxing
unit
other
than county or home! rule
city
may require
the county
to assess
and collect
taxes
for
t’w
district).
The board
of
directors
of
a
water
control
and imprownent
district
may appoint
one person
to the
off ice
of tax assessor-collector,
or it may order an election
to fill
that
office.
Water
Code: 051.085.
See
also
Tax Code
I§6.:Zic),
6.23(a)(3)
(governing
body of a water control
and assessment
district
may require
county
to as:,ess
and collect
its
taxes).
Chapter 2b of the Tax Code sets
out the
tax
assessor-collector’s
assessment
duties.
The iwsessor-collector
receives
the appraisal
roll
from
the chief
appraise!:.,
and determines
the total
eppraised
value,
total
assessed
value,
ar.d total
taxable
value
of property
taxable
by
the taxing
unit.
Tax Code 5526.01,
26.04.
After
the governing
body
adopts
the
tax
rate
fcr
the
current
tax
year,
the
tax
assessor-
collector
is
to calculate
the
tax
imposed
on each property
on the
appraisal
roll
according
to
the
formulas
supplied
by statute.
Tax
Code $26.09(a).
See al%
Tax Code 1526.10-26.14.
He enters
in the
appraisal
roll
the amount of
tax determined
according
to statute
and
submits
it
to
the
governin?
body of
the
appraisal
unit.
Tax Code
126.09(e).
The appraisal
roll
vith
amounts of
tax entered
becomes the
tax
roll
after
it
ts
approved
by the
governing
body.
Id.
The
governing
body,
on motion of the assessor
or of a property
owner, may
p. 2293
Mr. su
R. Smith - Paga 6
(Jn-499)
order
changes
in
the
tax
roll
to
correct
errors
Ia the mathematical
computation
of the tax.
Tax Code 126.15(c).
Chapter
31 of
the
Ta:r Code
governs
tax collections.
The tax
assessor
malls
out
tax
bil’ls
vhich
includa
information
set
out
by
statute.
Tax Cddc 431.01,
He may issue
certificates
showing
the
amount of delinquent
taxes,
penalties
, and interest
due on a property
according
to the taxing
un!.t.a records,
Tax Code 531.08(s).
He is to
file
reports
accounting
for
his
collections
to the governing
body and
remit
taxes to its
depositc’ry.
Tax Code 131.10.
These provisions
give
the tax assessor-collector
duties
that are
clerical
and ministerial.
In Aldine
Independent
School
District
v.
Standley,
the
court considlzred
vhether
the assessor-collector
of taxes
appointed
by a school
board
was a public
officer.
280 S.W.2d
578
(Tex.
1955).
The court
described
the assessor-collector
as follows:
He is but
an a;ient
or
employee
of
the Board to
discharge
the clerical
duties
necessary
to carry
out the school
Eoard’s
powers of taxation.
280 S.V.Zd at 583.
This characterization
also
applies
to the assessor-collector
of
taxes
appointed
by a school
district
or a Water control
and improve-
ment district.
The Tax &de
gives
the tax assessor-collector
ministe-
rial
duties
which may require
a certain
degree
of
skill,
but do not
vest
in him any sovereigil
function
of
the government to be exercised
largely
independent
-
of
t’he control
of
others.
Aldine
Independent
School
District
v. Standley,
s_upr;r.
In our opinion,
the
tax assessor-collector
is a
employee and not
an
officer
of
the
school
districts
and
the
water
control
and
improvement district
vh:.ch
hired
him.
He does not
occupy
a civil
office
vithin
article
XVI, section
40 of
the Texas Constitution,
ar.d
this
provision
does
not
bar
him from simultaneously
serving
as tax
assessor-collector
for
the
three
school
districts
and
one
vater
control
district.
We have determined
that a chief
appraiser
dces not
hold
a civil
office
wit,hin
article
XVI,
section
40 of
the
Texas
Constitution;
thus
this
provision
does
not prohibit
the
tax asses-
sor-collector
for
the
taxing
units
from
also
serving
as
chief
appraiser
of the three
county appraisal
districts.
We conclude
that
article
XVI,
section
40
of
the
Texas
Constitution
does not prohibit
this
individual
from holding
the seven
employments about which you inquire.
This opinion
is limited
to the
specific
legal
question
you asked,
and our answer is based on appli-
cation
of
the legal
st,lndard
to
the facts
you provided
us.
Whether
p. 2294
Hr.
Sam R.
Smith
-
Page
7
(JK-499)
additional
facts
might raise
other
legal
issues
is a question
outside
the scope
of
this
opinion.
:SUMl4ARY
The
chief
appraiser
of
a
county
appraisal
district
and
the
tax
assessor-collector
of
an
independent
school
district
or a water control
and
improvement
district
are public
employee6
and not
“officers”
within
article
XVI, secticn
40 of
the
Texas
Constituticn.
The
functions
assigned
to
these
positions
b7, the Tax Code do not confer
upon
them “any
sovereign
function
of
the
government
. . . to be exerc:ised
. . . largely
indeper.dent
of
the control
of others.”
Aldine Independent School
District
v.
Standby,
280 S.W.td 578 (Tex.
1955).
JIM
BATTOX
Attorney General of Texas
JACK HIGHTOWER
First
Assistant
Attorney
Gweral
MARY KELLER
Executive
Assistant
Attornlty General
ROBERT GRAY
Special
Assistant
Attorney
General
RICK GILPIN
Chairman, Opinion
Committee
Prepared by Susan L. Garrison
Assistant
Attorney
General
P. 2295
Attorney General opinions are persuasive, not binding on courts, and answer questions of law, not fact. Text extracted from the official PDF. Not legal advice.