Texas law on any date › Attorney General opinions
Attorney General Opinion JM-0466
Issued April 04, 1986
Re: Whether a home rule city may amend its ~charter within less than two fears of a pre- vious charter amendment 714 Jackson, Suite 700 Dallas, TX. 75202.4506 2141742-8944 4824 Alberta Ave., Suite 160 El Paso, TX. 799052793 91515334464 1001 Texas, Suite 700 Houston, TX. 77002-3111 7132235886 608 Broadway, Suite 312 Lubbock, TX. 79401-3479 8OW747.5238 4309 N. Tenth. Suite B McAllen. TX. 78501-1685 512/682-4547 200 Main Plaza. Suite 400 San Antonio, TX. 782052797 512l225-4191 An Equal OppOrtUnitYI Affirmative Action Employer
Cites: GV §41.001
The Attorney General's page · official PDF
The Attorney
General of Texas
JIM MATTOX
Attorney General
April 4, 1986
Supreme
Court Building
P. 0. Box 12548
Austin, TX. 78711.2543
5121475-2501
Telex
9101674.1387
Telecopier
512I475-0266
Honorable Clint ~a&my
ChailtlUll
Committee on Elect:&w
Texas House of Representatives
P. 0. Box 2910
Austin, Texas 78769
Opinion No. JM-466
Re: Whether a home rule city
may amend its ~charter
within
less than two fears of a pre-
vious charter amendment
714 Jackson,
Suite 700
Dallas, TX. 75202.4506
2141742-8944
4824 Alberta
Ave., Suite 160
El Paso, TX. 799052793
91515334464
1001 Texas, Suite 700
Houston, TX. 77002-3111
7132235886
608 Broadway,
Suite 312
Lubbock, TX. 79401-3479
8OW747.5238
4309 N. Tenth. Suite B
McAllen.
TX. 78501-1685
512/682-4547
200 Main Plaza. Suite 400
San Antonio, TX. 782052797
512l225-4191
An Equal OppOrtUnitYI
Affirmative
Action Employer
Dear Representative!
Hackney:
You ask the following question about the frequency with which a
home rule city may amend its charter:
May a home rule city seek to amend its charter
on April 5, 1986 whan in fact it had sought to
amend and did amend is charter by an election
held on Ihpril
7. 1984?
Article XI, swtion 5 of the Texas &stitution, which authorizes
home rule for cities of more than 5,000 inhabitants,
provides in part:
Citiell
having more than five thousand (5000)
inhabitants may, by a majority vote of the
qualified
votirs of said city, at ao election held
for that 'purpose,
adopt or amend their charters,
subject ':o such limitations
as may be prescribed
by the Legislature
. . . and provided further,
that no c!ity
charter shall be altered. amended or
repcam-bftener than every two years. (Emphasis
added).
Tex. Const. art. XI. 55. Article 1165, V.T.C.S., reiterates the
constitutional
reqrd.rements
quoted above.
Section 312.011 of the Government Code, which defines various
cormon words used in.
the civil statutes,
provides as follows:
The Eollowing definitions apply unless a
different.
meaning is apparent from the context of
the statute in which the word appears:
. . . .
(18)
'Year' means a calendar year.
p. 2134
Honorable Clint Hackney - I'age
2
(JM-466)
Under this statute and judicial constructions,
"one year" maam "a
calendar year." Seibert v. Sally, 238 S.W.Zd 266 (Tsx. Civ. App. -
Galveston 1951, no
A calendar year is 365 days or 366 in a
leap year. Douglas v. Acacia Mutual Life Insurance Co., 118 S.W.Zd
643 (Tex. Civ. App. - Waco-1938. writ ref'd). Thus, a suit to cancel
a life insurance policy filed 011 February 29, 1936, was filed within
one year of the policy's issuance on March
1, 1935. Id. See also
McGaughy v. City of Richardson. 599 S.W.Zd 113 (Tex.Tv. App. -
Dallas 1980, writ
ref'd n-x
("[a] calendar month rum from the
glveu day in one month to the day of the corresponding
number in the
next mouth").
Attorney General Opinion O-7211 (1946) determined the earliest
date that a home rule city Icharter
election could be held following a
charter amendment election held on October 16, 1945. It concluded
that another charter amendment election could not be held prior to
October 16. 1947.
In the case you inquire about
, ths
home rule city may not hold an
election to amend its charter before April 7, 1986. An election held
prior to that date will be invalid. See Cartledge
v. Wortham, 153 S.W.
297 (Tex. 1913); Clark v. Stubbs, 131 S.W.2d 663 (Tex. Civ.~
App. -
Austin 1939, no writ);,
V. Ingleside Independent
School District,
220 S.W. 350 (Tax. C1v.G:
- Fort Worth 1920, writ dism'd); Attorney
Gen&al Opinions MW-380 (1981); V-1109 (1950).
It is suggested that article 1165, V.T.C.S., is in conflict with
the statute designating
the dates that elections may be held and that
these provisions
should be harmonized. Section 41.001 of the Election
Code provides as follows:
(a) Except as otherwise provided by this sub-
chapter, each general or special election in this
state shall be held on one of the following dates:
(1) the third Saturday in January;
(2) the first Saturday in April;
(3) the second Saturday in August; or
(4) the first Tuesday after the first
Monday In November.
Election Code 341.001 (art. 2.01 of the formar Election Code). The
exceptions
do not encompass
'home
rule charter amendment elections.
Article 1165, V.T.C.S., and section 41.001 of the Election Code
are not in conflict. A city can comply with both provisions by
holding the election on tht! first authorized date after the lapse of
p. 2135
Honorable Clint Aackney - :?age
3
(JM-466)
two years. Article 1165:,
V.T.C.S., does not provide that charter
amendment elections be h'cld precisely two years apart. Moreover,
article XI. section 5 of ,the Texas Constitution,
which Imposes the
tvo-year requirement,
cauus't
be amended by the enactsmut of a statute.
See Tex. Const. art. XVII, $1; Mears v. State, 520 S.W.Zd 380 (Tex.
%.
.App. 1975); Attorney General Opinion M-874 (1971). Article XI.
section 5 of the Texas Constitution
and article 1165, V.T.C.S.. bar
the hone rule city in ques~tion
from holding an election to amend its
charter prior to April 7. 1986.
SUMMARY
Article XI, section 5 of the Texas Constitution
and article 116!i,,
V.T.C.S.. bar a hone rule city
from holding aa election to alter, amend, or
repeal its city charter oftener than every two
calendar years. A calendar year equals 365 days
or 366 days in leap year.
gzti
HATTOX
Attorney General of Texas
JACK BIGETOWRR
First
Assistant
Attorney General
MARYKELLER
Executive Assistant Attorney General
ROBERT GRAY
Special Assistant Attorney General
RICX GIIPIN
Chairmen, Opinion Cosmitttre
Prepared by Susan L. Garr:lson
Assistant Attorney General
p. 2136
Attorney General opinions are persuasive, not binding on courts, and answer questions of law, not fact. Text extracted from the official PDF. Not legal advice.