Texas law on any date › Attorney General opinions
Attorney General Opinion JM-0366
Re: Whether the Parks and Wildlife Columisslon may delegate certain permitting authority to the execu- tive director of the department
Cites: PW §86.002, PW §86.004, PW §57.45
The Attorney General's page · official PDF
JIM MAlTOX
Attorney
General
S~ppme
Own
Bullding
P. 0. Box 12548
Austin.
TX. ?8711- 2540
5121475-2501
Telex
9101874.1367
Telecopier
51214754266
714 .hckson.
Suite 7M)
Dallas,
TX. 75202-r506
2lU742.8944
4824 Alberta
Ave.. Suite 160
El Paso. TX. 799052793
915/-
lo0I
TBXPS. Suite 7W
Houston,
TX. 77002~3111
713l223ea6
808 Broadway.
Suite 312
Lubbock,
TX. 7B401-3419
8081747-5238
4309 N. Tenth, Suite B
McAllen.
TX. 78501~1685
51218824547
200 Mdn
Plaza. Suite 409
San Antonio. TX. 792052797
51212254191
A” Equal DOpo~unWl
Alllrmtive
Action Employer
The Attorney General of Texas
October 22. 1985
Mr. Charles D. Trmia
Executive Director
Texas Parks and W!.l.dlife
Department
4200 Smith School Road
Austin. Texas
711?44
Opinion No. JM-366
Re: Whether the Parks and Wildlife
Columisslon may
delegate certain
permitting authority to the execu-
tive director of the department
Dear Mr. Travis:
You ask us tixther the Parks and Wildlife Conmisslon [hereinafter
the "Comission"] is authorized, through its rulemaking powers, to
delegate to the Ih:ecutive Director the authority to issue permits in
compliance with chapter 86 of the Parks and Wildlife Code. See Parks
& Wild. Code 586.001 et seq. You qlso Inform us that the C~ission
has already delegated this permitting authority to the Executive
Director through rules promulgated more than ten years ago. See 31
T.A.C.
157.45.
Section
86.002(a) of the Parks and Wildlife Cod2 provides:
(a) No person may disturb or take marl, sand,
gravel, shell, or mudshell under the management
and protection of the eomission or operate in or
disturt any oyster
bed or fishing water for any
purpoac: other than that necessary or incidental to
navlgat:ion or dredging under state or federal
authorj.ty without first having acquired from the
commisc~Joa a permit authorizing the activity.
(Empha~~is added).
Section 86.004 provides:
The mmmisslon may grant a permit to an appli-
cant &I has complied with all requiramancs of the
zsoion
if the commission finds that
the dis-
turbinlc,,
taking, and carrying away of marl, sand.
gravel, shell, or mudshell will not:
(I) damage
or
injurlously affect
any
isl.md, reef, bar, channel, river. creek, or
bays
used for navigation, or any oysters,
p, 1677
Mr. Charles D. Travis - Page 2 (JM-366)
oyster beds, or fish
in or near the water used
in the oper#.tion; and
(2) cbar.g,a or
injuriously
affect
any
current
t'aat would
affect
navigation.
(Emphasis atided).
Moreover, any person desj.ring a permit must make a written application
to the Conmission. See I'arks & Wild. Code 186.003. If the Commission
refuses to grant a=Lt
to an applicant. the body is required to
make written findings of facts explaining the reason for the refusal.
See Parks h Wild. Code IE6.008; see also V.T.C.S. art. 6252-13a, 5515,
ma) . Therefore, the legislature has explicitly designated to the
Comrtssion the pemittinl; authority under chapter 86 of the Parks and
Wildlife Code.
Through its rulemak~iag authority, the Commission has delegated
its authority to issue permlts to the executive director. See 31
-
T.A.C.
557.45.
The agemy roles provide in part:
(a) The f&.owiag procedures will be followed
for the issuance of general permits:
(1) All requests for shell dredging permits
will be made, in writing to the director. . . .
.
(6) The +irector may consider the following
criteria in determining vhether to grant or
deny a permit.
. . . (Emphasis added).
See 31 T.A.C.
s57.45. The rules also provide for the director or any
Gloyee
authorized by 1:be director to hold a hearing to determine
vbether a permit will bl! granted. See 31 T.A.C. 1557.45(a)(4)-(8).
These rules make no provisions for the Conmission to make a final
datermination of wbetber a permit will be granted. Accordingly, they
are in conflict with sec,tion
15 of article 6252-13a. V.T.C.S. See
Citizens Bank of Bryan 7'. First State Bank, Eearne. 580 S.W.2d 344.
347
(Tex. 1979); see t?iso V.T.C.S. art. 6252-13a. 422
(lam
in
---
conflict vith the Adminl~~trative Procedure and Texas Register Act are
repealed). We also conclude that the rules In question are in direct
conflict with the legis:.ative mandate that the Commission grant or
deny permit applications.
Despite the fact
that
these
rules bave been In effect and have
been followed by the agency for ten years, they are contrary to the
plain meaning of the applicable statutes; and therefore, afford no
basis for the continuation of
this agency practice.
See Brown
--
Express, Inc. v, Railroad~Comission, 415 S.U.2d 394 (Tex. 1967).
p. 1678
Mr. Charles D. Travis - Page 3 (JM-366)
We do not
imply that the Commiaaion is totally precluded from
promulgating rules delegatir,g,
its authority to hold hearings on permit
applications. The legislatwe has not prohibited the Coamissio~ from
delegating this function. See Attorney
General Opinion
JM-244 (1984).
me-
But the Administrative Procedure and Texas Register Act requires that
the granting of an agency 'permit must comply with the provision6 of
the act concerning contested cases.
See V.T.C.S. art. 6252-13a.
113(3), 18(a). Although section 15 ofrhe
act clearly allovs the
appointment of a hearing examiner in such cases, see Grace v.
Structural Pest Control Boa::d of Texas, 620 S.W.2d 157 (K
Civ. App.
- Waco 1981, vrit ref'd n.r~~ommission
mst sake the ultimate
decision and include findluns of fact and conclusions of law in
compliance with sections 15 and 16. See Citizens Bank of Bryan v.
First State Bank, Hearne, supra. at 347; Texas Health Facilities
colmission v. Charter Medical-Dallas, Inc.. 665 S.W.2d 446 (Tex.
1984); Consusars Water, In-. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas,
651 S.W.2d 335 (Tex. App. -Austin 1983. no writ).
SUMMARP
Section 57.45 of chapter 31 of the Texas
Administrative Code is invalid because it is
inconsistent with chapter 86 of the Parks and
Wildlife Code an'3 article 6252-13a. the Adminis-
trative Procedure and Texas Register Act.
The
Parks and Wildl:.fe Commission is not precluded
from delegating :;ts authority to hold hearings on
permit applications so long as the practice is in
compliance with article 6252-13a.
-
JIM
HATTOX
Attorney General of Texas
TOM GREN
First Assistant Attorney G'sueral
DAVID R. RICRARDS
Executive Assistant AttoNqg General
ROBERT GRAY
Special Assistant Attorney
#General
RICR GILPIN
Chairman, Opinion Committee
p. 1679
Mr. Cherlee D. Travie - Pwgc 4 (JM-366)
Prepared by Tony Cuillory
Assistaut
Attonley
General
APPRovm:
OPINION CCRQlITTRg
Rick Gilpin. Chelrmm
Colin Carl
Sussn Garrison
Tony Guillory
Jim Mocllinger
Jennifer Riggs
Nancy Sutton
Sarah Woelk
p. 1680
Attorney General opinions are persuasive, not binding on courts, and answer questions of law, not fact. Text extracted from the official PDF. Not legal advice.