Texas law on any date › Attorney General opinions
Attorney General Opinion JM-0286
The Attorney General's page · official PDF
,M MATTOX
ttorney General
Ipmms court
8UlldklQ
r.aBox1254B
Auam, lx
75711.2545
2u75-2501
lkx QlW574-1357
I elecqpier 512147502s5
:4 Jackson, Sulto 700
wellas. TX. 75202.4505
2w742.SQ44
&24 Alberta Ave., Suile 180
El Rso. TX. 7QQtB2793
1Y5334454
Teme. suits 700
ouston. TX. 77w2.3111
131223-5888
I5 Broadway. Suite 312
xbbock. TX. 7Q401-3479
SCW747.5235
Xl9 N. Tenth. Suite B
nwllerl,
7x. 7asQt.1555
wa8S2.4547
Lw Makl flu*.
mte
400
Sm Antonio. TX. 7-2797
t2a25.4191
An Equal OppOrtunityI
Wirmalive Action Emplow
The Attorney’ Ge,neral of Texas
Dacetther 28,
1984
Bouorable
James S. L:(:rath
Criminal
District
At':orney
Opinion No.
m-286
Jefferson
County Courthouse
P. 0. Box 2553
Beaumont. Texas
77’104
Ret
Whether
handguns may be
bought,
sold,
and
traded
at
the Port
Arthur
Civic
Center,
a
premises
licensed
for
the
sale
or
service
of
alcoholic
beverages
Dear Mr. McGrath:
You inform us th,at handgun dealers
rent spaces at tha Port Arthur
Civic
Center
in ordr,r to sell
the guns.
The Civic
Center is licensed
by the state
for
the: sale
and service
of
alcoholic
beverages.
You
wish to know whethey, section
46.02 of the Penal Code is violated
when
handguns are bought,
sold,
and traded at the Port Arthur Civic
Center.
Section
46.02 of the Penal Code provides
es follows:
(a)
A
person
commits
an
offense
if
he
intentionally.
knowingly,
or recklessly
carries
on
or about II:Ls person
a handgun, illegal
knife,
or
club.
(b)
llxrept
as provided
in
Subsection
(c).
an
offense
under
this
section
is
a
Class
A
misdemeamr.
(c)
!m 'offense
under this
section
is
a felony
of the third
degree
if
it
occurs
on any premises
licensed
m: issued
a permit by thin
state
for
the
sale or sowice
of alcoholic
beverages.
Section
46.03 provides
certain
exceptions
to section
46.02 of the
Penal Code:
(a)
The provisions
of Section
46.02 of this
code
do not app::y to a person:
. . . >
n. 1270
Honorable James S. McGrath - l’oge 2
(JM-286)
(2)
on his ova premises
or premises
under his
coatrol
unless
he i.r an eeployee
or agent of
the
owner
of
the
premises
and
his
k-i-7
responsibility
is
tD act
in
the
capacity
of
a
private
security
,91ard to
protect
persons
or
DroDertY .
la
which
eveat
he
mbt
comol~
with
&bhivibion
(5) of
(3)
traveling;
. . . .
this subsection:
. -
Whether OF inJividuai tlas violated
section
46.02
or may avails
himself
of section
46.03 is a fact questioa
to be :esolved
through the
criminal
process.
See,
e.g.-,
Tex.
Coast.
art.
1.
S110,15,19;
Code
Grim.
Proc.
art.
1.03.
Thus,
ve
rannot
aaswer
your
question
as a
matter
of lav.
We can, however,
point
out judicial
constructions
of
sectioa
46.02
which
should
be
helpful
to
you
la
your
role
as
prosecutor
of alleged
violations
thereof.
Section
46.02(c)
of the Penal
Code has been strictly
enforced.
The court in Hilligan
v. Starl,
465 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Grim. Apr. 1971).
held
that
the
defendant
comitted
a felony
offease
by carrying
a
pistol
in a coffee
shop licmsed
to sell
beer,
even though it
could
not legally
sell
beer at the time defendant
was there.
A~I individual
prosecuted
under
section
4,6.02(c)
is
not,
however,
deprived
of
defenses
available
under
t!le
Penal
iode.
The Court
of
Criminal
Appeals
has decided
that the ~defwse of necessity,
which section
9.22
of the Penal Code defines,
16 not unmailable
as a matter of lav la a
prosecution
under section
46,02(c).
Johnson v.- State,
650 S.W.2d 414
(Tex.
Grim.
App.
1983)
(en baac).
Thus,
statutory
aad judicially
created
defenses
to
carryinS
a gun
are
not
iaapplfcable
to
such
conduct on premises
licensed
under the Alcoholic
LIeverages Code.
See
Flores
v. State,
486 S.W.2d !i77 (Tex. Grim. App. 1972).
-
Texas law has long inc:luded prohibitions
against
carrying
a gun
and has provided
the exceptiona
now found in sections
46.03(a)(2)
and
(3)
of
the
Penal
Code.
The Act
of
April
12.
1871.
made it
a
misdemeanor offense
for aayow
to carry
“oa or about his person
. . .
any pistol
. . . .w
Acts
1671. 12th Leg..
ch. 34. 51, at 25; C 8.
Ganunel, Laws of Texas 927 (1:3!M).
It included
the following
proviso:
[Plrovided,
that
this
section
shall
aot
be
so
construed
as to pwhibit
auy person
from keeping
or bearing
arms on his or her own premises.
or at
his
or her
own p:Lace of
business.
. . . nor
to
prohibit
persons
traveling
in
tLc
State
from
keeping or carrying
arms with their
baggage.
. . .
Woaorablc
James S. HcGrath - page 3
(JM-286)
Id.
Judicial
decisions
inte,rpretiag
the
Act
of
April
12.
1871.
created
an exception
allowing
the purchaser
to take a handgun home
from the places of purchase.
!iee Waddell v. State,
37 Tex. 354 (1872);
_--
Christian
v. State,
37 Tex. 475 (1872).
The legislature
has modified
the statutes
on illegal
carrying
of
guns. but the judicially
created
exception
has
continually
bmcen recognized.
See,
e.g..
Henson v.
State,
252 S.W.2d 711 (Tex.
~:rim. App. 1952);
Ho1
Ll&na- v.
State,
158
KS14
(Tex.
Grim. App.
1913);
Waterhouse
v.
State,
138 S.W.
386
(Tex.
Grim. App.
1911);
Pressler
v.
State,
19 Tex. App.
52 (1885).
See 20 Tex. Jur.
3d, Crimxr
Law 91332.
It has been held
that
the
purchaser
must carry
the gun i;rwithout
unreasonable
delay.
Benson
0.
State,
w
The judicially
created
defense
for
purchasers
and
the
statutory
defense
of
tr.rreling
are
relevant
to evaluating
the
conduct of an individual
who purchases a gun at the Port Arthur Civic
Center.
Whether an individual
is a traveler
is
generally
a question
of fact.
George v. State,
234 S.W. 87 (Tex. Grim. App. 1921).
We next
consider
provis~lons
relevant
to
the
conduct
of
the
handgun
dealers
who
sell
guns
in
the
Civic
Center.
Section
46.03(a)(2)
renders
section
46.02 of the Penal Code inapplicable
to a
person
on
premises
under hial control.
Cf.
Flores
v.
State,
(predecessor
of
v
section
46,02
inapplicme
to
liquor
licensee
s
employee carrying
arms at his
place
of employment).
A prior
opinion
of this
office
has determined
that premises
leased
by an individual
may qualify
as premises within
section
46.02(a)(2)
as long as he has a
right
to
control
these
premises.
Attorney
General
Opinion
H-22
(1973).
See also
Ever*
v.
2;.
576 S.W.Zd
46 (Tex.
Grim.
App.
1978);
Attorney
General
Opinion
H-185
(1973).
Whether
the handgun
dealers
have sufficient
control
over the spaces they rent at the Port
Arthur Civic
Center is a fact
question.
Whether
particu L;lr
conduct
violates
sectioa
46.02
of
the Penal
Code is
a fact
questioa.
A
judicially
created
defense
to prosecution
under
section
46.02 permit,8 the purchaser
of a handgun
to take
it
home.
!?remises leased
by a handgun
dealer
may qualify
as
premises
within
section
46.03(a) (2)
if
the dealer
has sufficient
control
of them.
JIM
MATTOX
Attorney
General of Texas
p. 1272
Honorable
James S. McGrath - Pzy;e 4
(JM-286)
TOMGRPXN
First
Assistant
Attoruey
Generd.
DAVID R. RICHARDS
Executive
Assistant
Attorney
Gmeral
RICR GILPIN
Chalnnan, Opinion Committee
Prepsred
by Susan Garrison
Assistant
Attorney
General
APPROVED:
OPINION COHMITTEE
Rick Gilpin,
Chairman
Colin Carl
Susan Garrison
Tony Guillory
Jim Moellinger
Jennifer
Riggs
Bruce Youngblood
p. 1273
Attorney General opinions are persuasive, not binding on courts, and answer questions of law, not fact. Text extracted from the official PDF. Not legal advice.