Texas law on any date › Attorney General opinions
Attorney General Opinion JM-0284
Re: Election of commissioners In Jefferson County Drainage District No. 7 the act establishing Jefferson County Drainage District No. 7 respecting the appo:lntment or election of commissioners “as long as five municipalities exist within the district.” Acts 1962. 57th Leg., 3rd C:S., ch. 34, at 98; Acts 1977. 65th Leg., ch. 614, at 1520. As amended, the provision now reads: Sec. 4. The management and control of the District &all be vested in five Commissioners. Except as %ovided bv this Act, the General Law of - the ‘!;tate of- Texas ielating to the Commissioners of drainage districts shall apply
Cites: WA §5
The Attorney General's page · official PDF
n
“M MATTOX
ttorney General
.preme ceurc BUlldirlQ
r. 0. Box 12548
Austin, TX. 79711.2548
-‘2/4752501
.,0x 910l8711387
I dIecopier
51214750258
4 Jackson,
Suite 700
raIlas.
TX. 752024506
2141742-8944
424
Alberta
Ave., Suite 180
El Paso. TX. 799052793
- 1515333484
,
, Texas, Suite 700
ouston, TX. 77002-3111
I312236885
X Broadway.
Suite 312
,bbock.
TX. 79401.3479
~061747-5238
3M) N. Tenth. Suite S
r.icAllm.
TX. 78501.1685
5121882.4547
&O Main Plaza. Suite 400
San Anlonio,
TX. 70205.2797
-1212254191
An Equal OppOrtunityI
,ltirmative
Aclion
Employer
The Attorney General of Texas
De :ember 28,
1984
lionorable
James S. McGrath
Criminal District
At'xrney
Jefferson
County
P. 0. Box 2553
Beaumont, Texas
77’104
Dear Mr. McGrath:
You have
asked for an opinion
construing
language in section
4 of
Opinion No. m-284
Re:
Election
of commissioners
In Jefferson
County Drainage
District
No. 7
the
act
establishing
Jefferson
County
Drainage
District
No.
7
respecting
the appo:lntment or election
of commissioners
“as
long as
five
municipalities
exist within
the district.”
Acts 1962. 57th Leg.,
3rd C:S.,
ch.
34,
at 98; Acts 1977. 65th Leg.,
ch. 614,
at 1520.
As
amended, the provision
now reads:
Sec.
4.
The management and
control
of
the
District
&all
be vested
in
five
Commissioners.
Except
as %ovided
bv this
Act,
the General
Law
of
- the
‘!;tate
of-
Texas
ielating
to
the
Commissioners
of drainage
districts
shall
apply to
the
Commiwioners
of
the District.
The present
Comlssioners
of
the
District
shall
remain
in
office
for-the
remainder of their
terms of office,
and
the
$:ovisions
of
Sections
56.061
through
56.063,
W:lter Code.
and Article
8161b,
Sec.
7.
Revised
Civil
Statutes
of Texas,
1925. as amended.
shall
apply
to the Conmissioners
of the District.
Section
56.064.
Water
Code,
as
amended,
shall
apply
to
this
District,
except
that
the
Commissioners
Court
shall
order
the
election
on
petition
of
at
least
20
percent
of
the
real
property
taxpayers
of the district,
and that
five
Conmissioners
shall
be
elected
at
large
if
an
election
j.a ordered
under that
section,
with
the
Comm~.ssioaers
Court
selecting
the
fifth
Coamissiouer
from
the
persons
tying
for
fifth
place
in the event of a tie.
After
the expiration
of the tezm,s of the present
Commissioners.
no more
than one ?o&ssioner
shall
be appointed
and/or
elected
f&o
any one municipality
as long as five
municipaljtles
exist
within
the district.
For all
P. 1261
Honorable James S. HcCrath - Page 2
(JIl-284)
purposes,
a
quorum
for
doing
business
shall
consist
of
a
majorify
of
the
Commission.
(Emphasis added).
You indicate
that interpyetation
is necessary
because
two of the
municipalities
that
formerly
existed
within
the
district
have
now
merged so that
there
now exkt
only
four
municipalities
within
the
district
rather
than
five.
The, provision
was last
amended in 1977 and
the
terms
of
the
commissioners
who
were
then
the
“present
commissioners”
have since
expired.
Water Code SS56.061 - 56.064.
Section
5 of
the federal
Voting
Rights
Act of
1965,
42 U.S.C.
91973c (1982).
as amended, pro!libits
a state
or -political
subdi.vision
subject
to
the
Act
from
enforcing
“any
voting
qualification
or
prerequisite
to
voting,
or
standard.
practice,
or
procedure
with
respect
to voting
different
from that in force
and effect
on November
1.
1964.”
unless
one of
two c,ondltions
has occurred.
The political
subdivision
is
required
elth@!r to secure
a declaratory
judgment from
the U.S. District
Court of the District
of Columbia that
such change
“does
not have the purpose and will not have the effect
of denying or
abridging
the right
to vote
on account
of race or color”
or to obtain
clearance
for
the
channe
from the
Attorney
General
of
the
United
States.
See Beer v.
Ukted
States,
425 U.S.
130 (1976).
As the
Supreme Court declared
in B&,
.
.
.
the
purpose of
section
5 has always been to
assure
that
no voting-procedure
changes would be
made that
would
lead
to
a retrogression
in
the
position
of
racia:.
minorities
with
respect
to
their
effective
exercise
of
the
electoral
franchise.
425 U.S.,
at 141.
Texas and Its
political
subdivisions
fall
within
the
scope
of section
5.
Any
change
in
the
present
procedure
for
selection
of
coumissioners.
i.e..
any deviation
from the present
geographical
basis
for
selection
in
order
to
conform
to
new political
boundaries,
j~ncluding
the
selection
of
a:11 commissioners
on
an at-large
basis,
might lead
to the kind of
retrogression
vhich
the Court condemned in
Beer.
Selection
on an at-,large
basis
would
remove
entirely
any
residency
requirement
for
I)::strict
coaaaissioners
and
subject
the
electoral
scheme
to
a
chal.lenge
that
it
dilutes
minority
voting
strength,
White v.
Regester,
412 U.S.
755 (1973).
In our opinion,
section
5 of
the
Voting
Rights
Act
could
invalidate
any.
election
result
based on any deviation
from the current
scheme of apportionment
unless
approval
for
change
is
obtained
from
federal
authorities.
Accordingly,
unless
and
until
the
District
complies
with
the
requirements
of
that
statute
--
by obtaining
either
a declaratory
Honorable
James S. McGrath - Page 3
(JI+284)
judgment from the U.S. District
Court for
the District
of Columbia or
preclearance
from
the
Attorney
General
of
the
United
States
--
District
commissioners
should
continue
to
be
selected
from
their
present
geographical
areas,
or
until
such
time
as
the
Texas
Legislature
takes action
to modify the governing
statute.
Unless and until
the Jefferson
County Drainage
District
No. 7 complies
with
the requirements
of
section
5 of
the Voting
Rights
Act of
1965,
42
U.S.C.
01973c
(1982).
by
obtaining
either
a
declaratory
judgment from the District
Court for
the District
of Columbia or preclearance
from the
Attorney
General
o,f the
United
States,
District
commissioners
shouli
continue
to be selected
from
their
present
geogr.aphical
areas.
TOM GFLEEN
First
Assistant
Attorney General
DAVID R. RICHARDS
Executive.Asslstant
Attorney
Banera
RICR GILPIN
Chairman. Opinion Committee
Prepared by Rick Gilpin
Assistant
Attorney
General
APPROVED:
OPINION COMMITTEE
Rick Gilpin.
Chairman
Colin Carl
Susan Garrison
Tony Guillory
Jim Moellinger
Jennifer
Riggs
D. 1263
Attorney General opinions are persuasive, not binding on courts, and answer questions of law, not fact. Text extracted from the official PDF. Not legal advice.