Texas law on any date › Attorney General opinions
Attorney General Opinion JM-0283
Re: Statua of contract high 6chool atudenta under the cosmetology Rcgulstory Act Tou heve requested our opinion regarding the status of contract high school atudentlt under the Coametology Reguletory Act. Your firat queation la vhether “contract high school atudenta” (ttudtnta vho receive cosmetology training from private beauty culture achoola with vhich their high achoola contr6ct) art private beeuty culture school student6 under the Qmmetology Rtgulatoxy Act. article 84516, V.T.C.S. If they 6rt eonafdtrred to be private beauty culture school 6tUdtnt6. you ask next if they muat complete 1500 hou
Cites: ED §22
The Attorney General's page · official PDF
i
JIM MAllOX
Womey General
suprem cowl SUlldlng
0. aor 12545
waon lx
75711.2545
51w75-25ol
Telex Olof574-lS7
‘hoopltf
512l475.0255
714 Julwn.
SuIta 700
~llao, ct. 752024505
!14n42aw4
I524 Albto6 Ave., sunt 150
‘il Paso, TX 7wos2723
OlY53334M
..#a leas, !&IN. 700
Nourton. lx. 77002-2lll
71Y223am
m5 srotaway. SUll@ 312
Lubbock TX. 7wQla472
3mf747.5225
4306 N. Tmth. SuIti B
MCAIIWI, lx. 75501.1555
5law52-4547
200 MaI flua, Suit. 4w
San Amdo.
TX. 75205.2757
512/2254191
An Equal 0p~01IunlW
AfflrmWw Actlon Employor
The Attorney
General
of Texas
Demmber
28. 1984
-
Hr. Eerbert
R. Cohen.
tiecutive
Director
rexea
Coameto1ogy
Ccmmiaafon
1111 Rio Gr6ude
Austin.
Texaa
78701,
Dear Mr. Cohen:
Opinion No.
JM-283
Re:
Statua
of contract
high
6chool
atudenta
under
the
cosmetology Rcgulstory
Act
Tou heve
requested
our opinion
regarding
the
status
of contract
high school
atudentlt
under
the Coametology
Reguletory
Act.
Your firat
queation
la
vhether
“contract
high
school
atudenta”
(ttudtnta
vho
receive cosmetology
training
from private
beauty
culture
achoola
with
vhich
their
high
achoola
contr6ct)
art
private
beeuty
culture
school
student6
under the Qmmetology
Rtgulatoxy
Act.
article
84516,
V.T.C.S.
If
they
6rt
eonafdtrred
to be private
beauty culture
school
6tUdtnt6.
you ask next
if
they muat complete
1500 hour6
of training
instruction
to quelifp
for
licrnaing
in cosmetology,
purauent
to section 10(b)
of
article
8451a.
Finally,
you ask vhethtr
these
public
school
atudenta
ere
to be conaidere:d,
in the
ealcul6tion
of l
nrollm6nt
for
purpoaea of
co6tputiag
the
atu&nt-instructor
ratio
for
private
beauty
culture
aehoela
under aection
22(2)
of article
8451e.
Section
10(b)
of 6rticle
84516 providea:
(b)
6x1 l
pplic8at
for m operator
license
auat
be at lemt
16 yeara
of
age,
h6ve
cowplettd
the
aevtnth grade
or
it6
equivalent.
end
beve
eom-
pleted
1 ,!iOO houra
of
instruction
in
a’ ‘licensed
beauty
culture
school
or 1,000
hour6
of inatruc-
tion
in beauty culture
course6
and 500 hour6
of
rtlettd
b.igh school
couraea
pretcrlbed
by
the
coadaaicn~
in 6 public
school
vocational
program.
Section
22(2)
Imovidta
that
a private
beauty
culture
school
ahall
(2) nointain on it6
ataff
and on duty
during
buaintaa
howa.
not
ltaa
than
tvo
full-time
lnatruct~xra licensed
under
this
Act.
except
that
ont inatzuctor
vi11
be
aufflcient
vbenevtr
the
student
er~rollmeot
drops belov
15.
p. 1256
Mr. Rtrberr
E. Cohen - Page 2
(JM-283)
Areiclt
VII,
aeccion
B
of
rhe
Texts
Constitution
veafa
l
dminia~ra~ivt
l
od
auptrviaozy
turhority
for
public
education
and
public
school
atudentt
lo
the Srart Board of
Educariou.
Members of
the
State Board of gducarion
art
also
members
of rhe Sttte
Board of
Vocetiooel
Education
and rhe Ctnrral
Educetlon
Agency.
See Educ. Code
1111.01.
11.41.
Further,
atctloo
11.02 of cht Educaeion~dt
provides
the f olloving:
(e)
The
Ctntwl
Educarion
Agancy
the11
exercise
general
control
of
rhe
system of public
education
at
the
v:aCe
level
in
accordance
vith
rht proviaiooa
of this
code.
(b)
Any activity
vith
persona
under
21 years
of age vhich
is
ccwritd
on lo
the
aceet
by other
state
or ftdertl
a~~encltt,
except
higher
education
in
approved
collagta,
shall
be
subject
in
its
education
eapecta
to the
rules
tnd regulations
of
rhe Ctntral
t!ductt Lon Agency.
No ata~uCt
dtltgacea
he
Scare
Board of Educacion’e
admioia~ra-
tive
end
supervisory
rtaponaibiliry
for
public
education
and public
tchool
arudeota
tither
to II privart
rtchoical
or
trade
school
vith
which
e public
school
diatxicc
cootracts,
or to
the
licensing
botrd
that
regularaa
rhat
privartr
technical
or
trade
school.
Similarly,
arrlcle
EbSla,
V.T.C.S..
doer ooC exprtaaly
or implfedly
confer
oo the
cosmetology
comniaaion
l
upexvlaory
or adminiatrarive
aufhorlty
for the
public
tducttion
of public
school
etudeore.
Article
8451t
dote coofer
on rht coamttology
comiaaloo
rht rtaponaibilicy
to prescribe
the 500
hours
of rtlared
high
achoo:l courses to be taken by a,tudtnta
enrolled
in rht public
school
vocarlcmrl
program.
V.T.C.S.
art.
84516.
IlO(
Adminiarrative
bodice
tmvt tmly
those
powers
expreaely
conferred
on
thcr
by attture
together
vj.th
those
ntceaaarily
implied
from exprtaa
powers
and duties.
Staufftr
v.
San Antonio.
344
S.W.Zd 158
(Ttx.
1961).
--
Set also
State
Boax, of ttorticiana
v.
Corttz.
333 S.W.Zd 039
(Tax.
19&o).
Therefore,
a school
district
may not delegate
Its
raaponaibility
for
rht
tductrioo
of
pub1.j.c school
atudenra
to a private
beauty
culture
school
or
to
the
coamttology
cocniaalon.
See Pent
v.
Rio
Grandt
Iodeptndtoc
School
I~fatrict,
616 S.W.2d 658 (G.
Civ.
App. -
Rtatlend
1981,
no vric).
Rot bee
the
cosmetology
c~fasion
beta
given
txpreaa
or implied
at,thority
for the education
of public
school
students.
Seerion 21.1111(s)
of the Education
Cods expressly
provides
chat
a school
district
p. 1257
Mr. tlerbtrr
E. Cohen - Page !
(a-283)
mey contract
virh
rnorhtr
school
dietrict
or vlrh
a
public
or
privstt
poet-ttcondary
educational
ioarlrution
or trada’or
ttchoical
school,
vhich
ia
regulated
by the Wste,
am deaignattd
in the State
Plen
for
Voutlonal
Education
to
provide
voca-
tional
claaaea
for students
la the district.
Subsection
(b) provides
that:
A pupil
vho atttni~r vocational
claaaea
at another
school
pursuant
to a contract
authorirtd
in
Sub-
section
(a)
shall
be included
In computetiona
of
average
daily
atttn~daoce
by the school
district
in
vhlch
he ia regularly
enrolled.
Set also
Educ.
Code 116.15li:;
Acts 1984;
66th
Leg.,
ch.
28.
at
3%
(providing
for
basic
allotment
and vocational
educational
allotmtnta
for atudtota
torolled
in vocational
education
programs).
We conclude
that
atudtata
who receive coamatology
training
from
private
beauty
culture
achoo1.a vith
vhich
their
high
schools
contract
arc public
high
school
atudto.ta
torolled
in a public
school
vocational
program.
To be eligible
fw:
a cosmetology
optraror'a
liceoae
uader
article
84516,
section
10(b),
they
must
complete
1000
hours
of
instruction
In beauty
cultwt
courses
and 500 hours
of
related
high
school
courses
rather
thar.
1500 hours
solely
in
a
private
beauty
culture
school.
See also
!Lluc.
Code 121.112;
Acts 1984.
68th
Leg..
ch.
28,
at
449
wonal
programa
ahtll
offer
competency-baaed
instruction.
. . .
Inatrwtion
must
be
baaed
on
the
tasencial
tlamenta
approved
by the Stcu:e Board of Rducatioo . . .").
Finally,
ve consider
vhether.
if
rhtat students
art
deemed to be
public
school
l
tudeota
vhc
should
be counted
in
the
average
daily
attendance
of their
school
illstrict,
they
mty be counted
am enrolled
in
a private
beauty
culture
school
for
purposes
of
calculating
a
student-instructor
ratio.
Section
22(2)
of
the
Zoamttology
Regulatory
Act provides
that
a
private
beauty
culture
school shall
maintain
on .ita
lit.aff
and on duty
during
bualneaa
hours
oot
ltaa
t:hao
rvo
full-tlma
instructors
lictnatd
under
this
Act,
except
chat
one
ioatructor
vi11 be sufficient
vhenever
the student
enrollment
drops belov
15.
We do not believe
that
thmk atatut
of these
students
as
pub~lic high
school
atudeota
precludes
them
from
being
cooaidertd
ta
contract
enrollees
in
a
private
beauty
culture
school
for
purposes
of
p. 1258
Mr. Rtrbart
E. Cohen - Ptge 4
(m-283)
ctleulating
a
student-lnatmctor
ratio
under
atction
22(2).
We
beliavt
the
inreot
of
aectioa
22(2)
it
to
provide
for
a reasonable
student-lnatnrctor
ricio
thet
trill
ensure
the prottcrion
of the public
safety tad velftrt by thorough
rreining
of
proapecCivt
cosmetology
liceoaeta.
Theraforo.
ve con~::ludt &et ehe intent
of rtctiou 22(2)
la
aatiafled
by
counting
all
wrollttr
in
l private
beauty
culture
school.
vhtther
privete
or
Imblic
school
atudtnta,
for
purposes
of
calculating
a student-inatiuccor
ratio.
Students
who receive cosmetology
rrainiog
from
private
bteuty
culture
schools
vith
vhich
their
high
schools
contrmt
are public
school
studeuro.
m=Y
art
require!d,
to
take
1000
hours
of
inarructfon
in
be.wty
culture
couratt
mod
500
hours
of
releted
high
school
courtta
in a public
school
vocetional
prosram am prescribed
by erticle
8451s.
section
10(b).
V.T.C.S.
Cheracteriratioa
of theme
students
am public
school
atudtota
dote
not
preclude
them
froll
being
conridered
em
contract
enrollees
in
a private
beauty
culture
school
for
purpoaea of
calculating
l acudant-
inatntceor
ratio
under
section
22(2)
of
article
84516.
V.T.C.S.
JIM
MATTOX
Attorney
Gtntral of Texas
TQMGllEEN
First
Aaaiatant
Attorney Gtocral
DAVID R. RICHARDS
Executive
Assistant
Attorney Gtotral
RICK GILPIN
Chatrman.
Opinion
Comnirtte
Prepared
by Rick Gllpln
Ataittant
Attorney Central
Mr. Rerbcrt
t.
Cohen - Page 5
(JH-283)
APPROVED:
OPINION COWUTTER
Rick Gilpin,
Cheirmen
Colill
Cerl
Susan Catrlron
Tony Guillory
Jim noellinger
Jenriifcr
Riggs
Nancy Sutton
p, 1260
Attorney General opinions are persuasive, not binding on courts, and answer questions of law, not fact. Text extracted from the official PDF. Not legal advice.