Nonpartisan public records for Texas special districts Resident sign in
Texas Open Books

Texas law on any date › Attorney General opinions

Attorney General Opinion GA-1036

Issued January 02, 2014

Re: Whether Texas Constitution article XVI, section 40 prohibits a constable from serving as a commissioner of an emergency services district

Cites: CN §16.40, CN §16.61

The Attorney General's page · official PDF

CD ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS GREG ABBOTT The Honorable R. Lowell Thompson Criminal District Attorney Navarro County Courthouse 300 West 3rd Avenue, Suite 203 Corsicana, Texas 75110 Dear Mr. Thompson: January 2, 2014 Opinion No. GA-1036 Re: Whether Texas Constitution article XVI, section 40 prohibits a constable from serving as a commissioner of an emergency services district (RQ-1137-GA) You ask whether Texas Constitution article XVI, section 40 prohibits a Navarro County constable from serving as a commissioner of an emergency services district ("ESD"). 1 Article XVI, section 40 provides that "[n]o person shall hold or exercise at the same time, more than one civil office of emolument." TEX. CONST. art. XVI, § 40(a). The constitutional dual office- holding prohibition applies if both positions (1) qualify as "civil offices," and (2) are entitled to an "emolument." Id This office has previously determined that a constable holds a civil office of emolument, and your request letter does not question this conclusion. Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. GA-0540 (2007) at 2; see also TEX. Loc. Gov'T CODE ANN. § 154.001 (West 2008) (defining a constable as a "precinct officer"); TEX. CONST. art. XVI, § 61(b) (mandating that constables be paid on a salary basis). Instead, you question whether the position of ESD commissioner is also an office of emolument subject to article XVI, section 40. See Request Letter at 2. To address your question, we first examine whether an ESD commissioner is an "officer" for purposes of article XVI, section 40. The determinative factor distinguishing an ' officer ' from an employee is "whether any sovereign function of the government is conferred upon the individual to be exercised by him for the benefit of the public largely independent ofthe control of others." A/dine Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Standley 280 S.W.2d 578 583 (Tex. 1955). This office has previously determined that ESD commissioners meet the A/dine test and are thus public officers. See Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. DM-114 (1992) at 5 (noting the various governmental powers conferred upon an ESD board to be exercised for the benefit of the public largely 1See Letter from Honorable R. Lowell Thompson, Navarro Cnty. Crim. Dist. Att'y, to Honorable Greg Abbott, Tex. Att'y Gen. at 1 (July 23, 2013), http://www.texasattomeygeneral.gov/opin ("Request Letter"). The Honorable R. Lowell Thompson - Page 2 (GA-1036) independent of the control of others); see also, e.g., TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. §§ 775.031(a) (West Supp. 2013) (authorizing a district to acquire and sell real and personal property; appoint officers, agents, and employees; sue and be sued; impose and collect taxes; exercise certain specific powers relevant to emergency services; enter into contracts; borrow money; and perform other necessary acts), 775.034(a) (providing that commissioners serve as the district's governing body). Next we determine whether an ESD commissioner holds an office of "emolument." An emolument is "a pecuniary profit, gain or advantage." State ex rei. Hill v. Pirtle, 887 S.W.2d 921, 931 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994). While the reimbursement of actual expenses does not constitute an emolument, any amount received in excess of actual expenses is an emolument. Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. GA-0540 (2007) at 2. Likewise, an amount received as a flat payment per meeting or a fixed per diem allowance is also an emolument. Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. GA- 0032 (2003) at 2. An ESD commissioner "is entitled to receive compensation of not more than $50 per day for each day the commissioner actually spends performing the duties of a commissioner" up to a maximum amount, and additionally "may be reimbursed for reasonable and necessary expenses incurred in performing official duties." TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 775.038(a) (West 2010). In lieu of this arrangement, "a commissioner may elect to receive per diem compensation of $50 for each day the commissioner actually spends performing the duties of a commissioner" up to a maximum amourit, although by doing so, a commissioner forfeits any reimbursement for reasonable and necessary expenses. /d. § 775.038(b). Under either scenario, an ESD commissioner receives compensation for his or her services and thus holds an office of emolument? Because a constable also holds a civil office of emolument, article XVI, section 40 of the Texas Constitution prohibits a person from simultaneously serving as a constable and a commissioner of an emergency services district. Because we conclude that article XVI, section 40 prohibits the dual service about which you ask, we need not consider your question under the common-law doctrine of incompatibility. See Request Letter at 2 (referencing the common-law standard of incompatibility). 2Y ou express concern that the creation of an ESD by virtue of an election and the fact that vacancies on the ESD board are filled by appointment of the commissioners court may affect whether a Navarro County ESD commissioner holds a civil office of emolument. Request Letter at 2. However, neither of these facts alters the sovereign functions of government conferred by statute on ESD commissioners or their right to compensation. The Honorable R. Lowell Thompson - Page 3 (GA-l 036) SUMMARY Article XVI, section 40 of the Texas Constitution prohibits a person from simultaneously serving as a constable and a commissioner of an emergency services district. DANIEL T. HODGE First Assistant Attorney General JAMES D. BLACKLOCK Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel VIRGINIA K. HOELSCHER Chair, Opinion Committee Becky P. Casares Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee

Attorney General opinions are persuasive, not binding on courts, and answer questions of law, not fact. Text extracted from the official PDF. Not legal advice.