Texas law on any date › Attorney General opinions
Attorney General Opinion GA-0642
Issued January 11, 2008 · request RQ0669GA
Re: Whether the creation ofa county court at law and the related divestiture of the constitutional county court's probate,juvenile, civil, and criminal jurisdiction stripped a county judge of his powers as "magistrate"
Cites: CN §5.15, CN §5.16, CN §5.1, GV §1.42, GV §1.41, GV §22.5, GV §1, GV §2
The Attorney General's page · official PDF
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
GREG
ABBOTT
July 8, 2008
The Honorable James L. Anderson, Jr.
Aransas County Attorney
301 North Live Oak Street
Rockport, Texas 78382
Dear Mr. Anderson:
Opinion No. GA-0642
Re: Whether the creation ofa county court at law
and the related divestiture of the constitutional
county court's probate,juvenile, civil, and criminal
jurisdiction stripped a county judge of his powers
as "magistrate" (RQ-0669-GA)
You tell us that "[i]n 2001 the Legislature ofthe State ofTexas created the Aransas County
Court at Law and removed all civil, probate, juvenile and criminal jurisdiction from the County
Court of Aransas County and vested that jurisdiction in the Aransas County Court at Law."} You
indicate that "[t]he County judge (Judge of the County Court of Aransas County Texas) wishes
to magistrate prisoners in the Aransas County Jail, read them their rights, set bonds and perform
all other duties as a magistrate set out by the Code of Criminal Procedure." Request Letter, supra
note 1; see also TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 2.09 (Vernon Supp. 2007) (listing countyjudges
as magistrates). You seek to understand whether the county judge retains the power to act as a
magistrate in light ofthe 2001 legislative changes. Request Letter, supra note 1.
I.
Background
A.
General
Article V, section 15 ofthe Texas Constitution establishes a "County Court" for each county.
TEX. CONST. art. V, § 15. These courts are commonly referred to as "constitutional county courts"
to distinguish them from county-level courts created by statute. See Tex. Pipe Line Co. v. Hunt, 228
S.W.2d 151, 153 (Tex. 1950) (referring to courts created by article V, section 15 as "constitutional
county courts"). A constitutional county court "hasjurisdiction as provided by law" and the county
judge, as the presiding officer, "has judicial functions as provided by law." TEX. CONST. art. V,
§ 16; see also, e.g., TEX. GOV'TCODEANN. §§ 26.045(a) (Vernon Supp. 2007) (giving county court
lSee Letter from Honorable James L. Anderson, Jr., Aransas County Attorney, to Honorable Greg Abbott,
Attorney General of Texas (Jan. 8, 2008) (on file with the Opinion Committee, also available at http://www
.texasattorneygeneral.gov) [hereinafter Request Letter].
The Honorable James L. Anderson, Jr. - Page 2
(GA-0642)
exclusive original jurisdiction over certain misdemeanor offenses), 26.046 (Vernon 2004) (giving
county court certain appellate jurisdiction); TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 4.07 (Vernon 2005)
(giving county court original jurisdiction over certain misdemeanor offenses).
Article V, section 1 ofthe Texas Constitution authorizes the Legislature to "establish such
other courts as it may deem necessary and prescribe the jurisdiction and organization thereof,"
including county-level courts. TEX. CaNST. art. V, § 1; see Regian v. Sowell, 534 S.W.2d 175, 176
(Tex. Civ. App.-Waco 1976, writ refd n.r.e.). Article V, section 1 courts are oftentimes referred
to as "statutory courts." See Regian, 534 S.W.2d at 176 (observing that under article V, section 1
ofthe Texas Constitution, "the Legislature has from time to time created so-called 'statutory' courts
across the State, such as county courts at law, county civil courts, domestic relations courts and
others").
Title 2, subtitle A of the Government Code establishes statutory county courts and
otherwise provides for both constitutional and statutory courts. See, e.g., TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN.
chs. 25 ("Statutory County Courts"), 26 ("Constitutional County Courts") (Vernon 2004 & Supp.
2007).
"[T]here is a tradition of divesting the constitutional county court[s] of [their] judicial
jurisdiction-eivil and criminal-and placing" that jurisdiction with other courts, such ..as the
statutory county courts,2 because ofthe myriad legislative and administrative duties county judges
have in addition to theirjudicial duties, such as serving as the presiding officer ofthe commissioners
court. 40 GEORGE E. DIX, TEXAS PRACTICE: CRIMINAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE § 1.42 (2d ed.
2001); see ide §§ 1.41 ("In large and middle sized counties, the[] statutory courts handle much ofthe
judicial business that the County Judge handles in small counties."), 1.45 ("Part of the movement
to divest constitutional county courts oftheir civil and criminal jurisdiction has been the creation of
various so called 'statutory county courts."'); see also 36 DAVID B. BROOKS, TEXAS PRACTICE:
COUNTY AND SPECIAL DISTRICT LAW § 22.5 (2d ed. 2002) ("The county judge in Texas serves as
the presiding officer ofthe commissioners court, in addition to being the judge ofthe county court.
He also performs diverse administrfltive duties in his own name and title ...."). Divestiture has
been accomplished on a county-by-county basis rather than a statewide basis. See 40 GEORGE E.
DIX, TEXAS PRACTICE: CRIMINAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE § 1.42 (2d ed. 2001).
Thus, the
Government Code provisions creating the courts in a particular county must be examined in order
to determine the jurisdiction ofthose courts. See ide We now turn to analyze the county-level courts
ofAransas County.
B.
County-level Courts of Aransas County
In 2001, the Legislature passed House Bill 3643 establishing the County Court at Law of
Aransas County ("County Court at Law") and altering the jurisdiction of the Aransas County
constitutional court. See Act of May 22,2001, 77th Leg., R.S., ch. 688, §§ 1-2,2001 Tex. Gen.
Laws 1311, 1311-12 (codified at TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. §§ 25.0061-.0062,26.104). Section
2Generally, "[a] statutory county court has jurisdiction over all causes and proceedings, civil and criminal,
original and appellate, prescribed by law for county courts." TEX. Gov'r CODEANN. §25.0003(a) (Vernon Supp. 2007).
The Honorable James L. Anderson, Jr. - Page 3
(GA-0642)
25.0061, Government Code, establishes the County Court at Law. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN.
§ 25.0061 (Vernon 2004). It provides: "Aransas County has one statutory county court, the County
Court at Law of Aransas County." Id. The County Court at Law has "jurisdiction provided by
Section 25.0003[, Government Code,] and other law" as well as concurrent jurisdiction with the
district court in family law cases and "felony cases to conduct arraignments, conduct pretrial
hearings, and accept guilty pleas." Id. § 25.0062(a). Section 26.104, Government Code, provides
the following as to the constitutional court: "The County Court ofAransas County has no probate,
juvenile, civil, or criminaljurisdiction." Id. §26.104. Thus, the Aransas County constitutional court
was divested ofits probate, juvenile, civil, and criminal jurisdiction when the County Court at Law
was created.
II.
Analysis
You ask the following regarding the 2001 legislative action as to the Aransas County courts:
Because the County Judge is enumerated in the Code of Criminal
Procedure as a "Magistrate" did the enabling legislation creating the
Aransas County Courtat Law, vesting certainpowers andjurisdiction
in it, and divesting certain powers and jurisdiction from the Aransas
County Court, remove the County Judge's magistrate rights and
powers granted and mandated under the Code of Criminal Procedure,
thereby preventing the County Judge of Aransas County from having
the authority to read prisoners rights, set bonds, issue search warrants
and perform other duties as set out bythe Code of Criminal Procedure
for magistrates?
Request Letter, supra note 1.
Article 2.09, Criminal Code of Procedure, lists a county judge as a magistrate within the
meaning of that Code. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 2.09 (Vernon Supp. 2007) (listing
various officers from the justices of the Supreme Court to the mayors and recorders of incorporated
cities as magistrates). And while a county judge's role as magistrate may grow out ofthe office of
countyjudge, courts ofthis state have clearly distinguished between the two positions. Cf State ex
rei. Holmes v. Salinas, 784 S.W.2d421, 423 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990) (indicating that respondent was
"being sued in his limited capacity as magistrate rather than his general capacity as trial courtjudge
of a district court"); Tex. Dep 't ofTransp. v. Marquez, 885 S.W.2d 456, 458 (Tex. App.-EI Paso
1994, no writ) (holding that district judge convened court of inquiry acting as magistrate and thus
court of appeals lacked jurisdiction to issue mandamus directing district judge to terminate
proceedings).
More importantly to the issue at hand, courts in this state have held that the jurisdiction of
a magistrate is not determined by the subject matter jurisdiction ofthe court upon which the judge
ordinarily sits. See o'Quinn v. State, 462 S.W.2d 583,588 (Tex. Crim. App. 1970) ("That it was
not the intent ofthe legislature to limit the authority ofthejudge, recorder or mayor to administering
The Honorable James L. Anderson, Jr. - Page 4
(GA-0642)
the oath to complaints charging offenses which the corporation court has jurisdiction to try is made
clear by Art. 2.09 V.A.C.C.P., making the mayors and recorders and the judges of the city courts
... magistrates."); Exparte Knight, 904 S.W.2d 722, 726-27 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1995,
writ refd) (concluding that justice court, sitting as a magistrate and not a justice ofthe peace, can
take a felony complaint and issue a warrant of arrest even though the justice court does not have
jurisdiction over felony cases). Rather, all magistrates ofa given county have co-equal magistrate
jurisdiction. See Ex parte Clear, 573 S.W.2d 224,228 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); see also Tex. Att'y
Gen. Ope Nos. GA-0551 (2007) (discussing ajustice ofthe peace's jurisdiction over a defendant in
a felony case); MW-581 (1982) (discussing Clear).
Here, section 26.104 of the Government Code addresses the subject matterjurisdiction ofthe
county court. TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 26.104 (Vernon 2004). It makes no mention ofthe county
judge's duties and powers as a magistrate-a role, as we have previously explained, that is separate
from that as presiding officer ofthe county court. See, e.g., TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. arts. 2.10
(Vernon 2005) (setting out general magisterial duties); 6.01-.04 (requiring a magistrate to act to
prevent threatened offenses); 15.03(a) (authorizing a magistrate to issue a warrant of arrest or a
summons in certain circumstances); 15.17 (Vernon Supp. 2007) (setting out a magistrate's duties,
including reading rights, when an arrested person is brought before the magistrate); 18.01 (Vernon
2005) (indicating a magistrate can issue a search warrant). Based on the express language ofsection
26.104 and the principle set out in 0 'Quinn, Knight, and Clear that the jurisdiction ofa magistrate
is distinct from that ofthe underlying court upon which the officer sits, we conclude that the county
judge ofAransas County retains the power to act as a magistrate subsequent to the 2001 legislative
change that divested the Aransas County Court of its probate, juvenile, civil, and criminal
jurisdiction.
The Honorable James L. Anderson, Jr. - Page 5
(GA-0642)
SUMMARY
The county judge of the Aransas County Court ("Court"), a
constitutional court, retains the power to act as a magistrate despite
the fact that the Court was divested of its probate, juvenile, civil, and
criminal jurisdiction.
KENT C. SULLIVAN
First Assistant Attorney General
ANDREW WEBER
Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel
NANCY S. FULLER
Chair, Opinion Committee
Chr~sty Drake-Adams
Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee
Attorney General opinions are persuasive, not binding on courts, and answer questions of law, not fact. Text extracted from the official PDF. Not legal advice.