Texas law on any date › Attorney General opinions
Attorney General Opinion GA-0487
Issued May 24, 2006
Re: Meaning of Occupations Code requirement that a chiropractic license applicant complete 90 semester hours of college courses~at a school other than a chiropractic school; scope of Board of Chiropractic Examiners’ rule-making authority
Cites: OC §201.302, OC §201.303, OC §20, OC §201.305
The Attorney General's page · official PDF
ATTORNEY
GENERAL
OF TEXAS
GREG
ABBOTT
December 4,2006
The Honorable Florence Shapiro
Chair, Committee on Education
Texas State Senate
Post Office Box 12068
Austin, Texas 78711
The Honorable Mike Jackson
Chair, Committee on Nominations
Texas State Senate
Post O&e
Box 12068
Austin, Texas 78711
The Honorable Burt R. Solomons
Chair, Committee
on Financial Institutions
Texas House of Representatives
Post Office Box 2910
Austin, Texas 78768-2910
Opinion No. GA-0487
Re: Meaning of Occupations Code requirement
that a chiropractic
license applicant
complete
90 semester hours of college courses~at a school
other
than
a chiropractic
school;
scope
of
Board of Chiropractic
Examiners’
rule-making
authority
(RQ-0494-GA)
Dear Senator Shapiro, Senator Jackson, and Representative
Solomons:
The Occupations
Code requires an applicant for chiropractic licensing by examination
to
have “completed 90 semester hours of college courses at a school other than a chiropractic school.”
TEX. Oct. CODE ANN. 5 201.302(a)(3) (V ernon Supp. 2006). In separate requests, you ask about
the meaning of this statutory requirement and the authority of the Board of Chiropractic Examiners
(the “Board”) to vary or clarify the statute.’
We are informed that some institutions
of higher education offer a chiropractic doctoral
,degree program as well as bachelor degree programs in fields of study other than chiropractic.
See
Shapiro and Jackson Request Letter, supra note 1, at 1. The institutions
are. accredited by the
‘See Letter from Honorable Florence Shapiro, Chair, Senate Committee on Education, and Honorable Mike
Jackson, Chair, Senate Committee on Nominations, to Honorable Greg Abbott, Attorney General of Texas (June 27,
2006) (on tile with the Opinion Committee, a&o available af http://~.oag.state.tx.us)
[hereinafter Shapiro and
Jackson Request Letter]; Letter from Honorable Burt R. Solomons, Chair, Committee on Financial Institutions, Texas
House of Representatives, to Honorable Greg Abbott, Attorney General of Texas (May 23, 2006) (on tile with the
Opinion Committee, also available at http:ilwww.oag.state.tx.us.) [hereinafter Solomons Request Letter].
The Honorable Florence Shapiro - Page 2
The Honorable Mike Jackson
The Honorable Burt R. Solomons
(GA-0487)
Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (“SACS”). See Solomons Request Letter, supva note
1, at l-2. The Council on Chiropractic Education (“CCE”) accredits the institutions’ chiropractic
doctoral programs but not their non-chiropractic
programs. See Shapiro and Jackson Request Letter,
supra note 1, at 1. The CCE requires a student to complete 90 hours of undergraduate
study prior
to admission to a chiropractic doctoral program. See Solomons Request Letter, supra note 1, at 1.
The CCE’s standards would not prohibit a student from completing
the undergraduate
study
requirements
and the chiropractic doctoral program at the same institution, provided the institution
is accredited by a nationally recognized accrediting organization such as SACS. Id: at 1-2.
Recently, three graduates of the Texas Chiropractic
College
applied to the Board for
chiropractic
licenses.
See Solomons
Request Letter, supra note 1, at 1. The Board denied their
applications in part for failure to comply with section 201,302(a)(3), which requires that an applicant
complete “90 semester hours of college courses at a school other than a chiropractic school.” Id. at
1-2; TEX. Oct. CODE ANN. § 201.302(a)(3) (V emon Supp. 2006). We gather that these applicants
obtained some or all of their 90 semester hours at Texas Chiropractic College or another institution
that also offers a chiropractic ‘doctoral degree program.
The Board has informed
us of its
understanding
that section 201,302(a)(3) “appears to be unambiguous
and to prohibit the Board from
accepting college courses taken at a chiropractic school toward the [90] required semester hours” of
college credit.2 And because of its understanding
of section 201.302(a)(3) as an unambiguous
prohibition, the Boamasserts
that it is powerless to promulgate a rule that would allow an applicant
to obtain any of the required 90 semester hours of college courses at a “chiropractic school.” See
TBCE Brief, supra note 2, at 5. All of your questions relate to the Board’s interpretation of section
201,302(a)(3).
See Shapiro and Jackson Request Letter, supra note 1, at 2; Solomons Request
Letter, supra note 1, at 2-3.
The Board’s construction necessarily assumes that section 201.302 unambiguously
equates
a “chiropractic school” with any institution that offers a chiropractic degree program, regardless of
any other non-chiropractic
courses and~degrees it may offer. We disagree with that assumption and
with the Board’s understanding
of the statute, particularly with regard to the Board’s rule-making
authority.
Section 201.302(a) provides in pertinent part:
An applicant
for a license
by examination
must present
satisfactory evidence to the board that the applicant:
)
(3) has completed
90 semester hours of college courses at a
school other than a chiropractic school; and
‘See Brief from Honorable Glenn Parker, Executive Director, Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners, to
Honorable Greg Abbott, Attorney General of Texas, at 34 (June 30, 2006) (on file with the Opinion Committee)
[hereinafter TBCE Brief].
The Honorable Florence Shapiro - Page 3
The Honorable Mike Jackson
The Honorable Burt R. Solomons
(GA-0487)
(4) is either a graduate or a final semester student of abona fide
reputable chiropractic school.
TEx. OCC. CODE ANN. 5 201.302(a) (Vernon Supp. 2006).
By its terms the language of this
subsection contemplates
a distinction between a “chiropractic school” and a “school other than a
chiropractic
school.”
But the nature of that distinction hinges on what is meant by “chiropractic
school.”
Chapter 201 does not define “school,” “chiropractic
school,” or “school other than a
chiropractic school.” For undefined statutory terms, we look to their common meaning.
See TEX.
Gov’TCODEANN. ~3ll.Oll(a)(Vemon2005).
Butevenlimitedto
thecontextofhighereducation,
the word “school” may have more than one meaning-for
example, it may mean an institution
of
higher education as a whole, such as a college or university, or it may mean a department,
faculty,
or institution that provides specialized education and that is a part of a larger institution of higher
education?
Thus, consideration
of the common meanings of the word “school” does not frilly
resolve the meaning
of the term “chiropractic
school” in subsection 201,302(a)(3).
When an
institution
offers both chiropractic
and’ non-chiropractic
degree programs; “chiropractic
school”
could refer to the institution as a whole or to the chiropractic department or other subdivision within
the larger institution.
A statute’s terms and phrases must not be construed in isolation, but instead a statute must
be considered
as a whole. See id.; City of San Antonio v. City ofBoeme, 111 S.W.3d 22,25 (Tex.
2003). But here, consideration of the phrase “stihool other than a chiropractic school” in the context
of the statute as a whole does not clarify its meaning.
The phrase is repeated in subsection (d) of
section 201.302:
Notwithstanding
Subsection
(a)(3), if the Council
on
Chiropractic
Education
or another national chiropractic
education
accreditation organization recognized bythe board requires anumber
of semester
hours of college courses at a school other than a
chiropractic
school that is greater or less than the number of hours
specified by that subsection to qualify for admission to a chiropractic
school, the board may adopt the requirement of that organization
if
the board determines that requirement to be appropriate.
TEX. OCC. CODE ANN. § 201.302(d) (Vernon Supp. 2006). From the express reference to subsection
(a)(3), the phrase “school mother than a chiropractic school” must be given the same meaning in
‘See, e.g., THE NEW OXFORD
AMERICAN
DICTIONARY
1525 (2001) (definitions of “school” include “ any
institution at which itlstruction is given in B particular discipline
another term for UNIVERSITY
a department
OI faculty of a university concerned with a particular subject of study); WEBSTER’S
THIR~NEW
INT’LDICTIONARY
203 1
(3d ed. 2002) (definitions of “school” include: “an organized s~mce of education or training: BS
(2) an institution
for specialized higher education usu. withill a university <the - of medicine at the state university> (3) COLLEGE,
UNIVERSITY”).
The Honorable Florence Shapiro - Page 4
The Honorable Mike Jackson
The Honorable Burt R. Solomons
(GA-0487)
subdivision (d) that it has in subdivision (a)(3). Id. Beyond that, however, subsection (d) does not
dictate the phrase’s precise meaning.4
We also may consider a term or phrase’s use in a related statute to determine if it reveals the
term or phrase’s meaning.
See Duvall v. Tex. Dep’t of Human Sew., 82 S.W.3d 474,480 (Tex.
App.-Austin
2002, no pet.) (holding that “[albsent language indicating a contrary intent, a word
or phrase used in different parts of a statute is presumed to have the same meaning throughout”).
Section 201.303(d) lists standards required of a “bona fide reputable chiropractic school.“5 The
statute does not define “chiropractic school,” however, and its standards could apply equally well
to an institution that offers both chiropractic and non-chiropractic
programs
or to a department
within such an institution.
Thus, neither context nor the common meaning of the words used in section 201,302(a)(3)
give certain meaning to the term “chiropractic school” or the phrase “school otherthan a chiropractic
school.”
In section 201.302, the term “chiropractic
school” may reasonably be construed as a
chiropractic department or comparable division within an institution that offers both chiropractic and
non-chiropractic
cowses and degree programs. In that instance, the department or division providing
the chiropractic degree program would be the “chiropractic school,” but not the larger institution
‘We note that the CCE requires an applicant to a doctor of chiropractic program to obtain 90 hours of pre-
chiropractic education from an accredited institution, but does not requiwthat institution to be separate from the
institution offering a doctor of chiropractic program. See THE CO~NCILONCHIROPRACTICEDUCATION,
STANDARDS
FOR
DOCTOR
OF CHIROPRACTIC
PROGRAMS
AND REQUIREMENTS
FOR INST~KITIONAL
STATUS,
at 22 (Jan. 2006) [hereinafter
CCE Standards], mailable af http:liwww.cce-usa.org/2006%20Januay%2OSTANDARDS.pdf
(last visited Nov. 27,
2006).
‘Section 201.303(d) provides:
A bona tide reputable chiropractic school that satisfies Section 20 1.302(a)(4)
is one that:
(1) has entrance requirements and a COUIX of instruction as high as those of
a better class of chiropractic schools in the United States;
(2) maintains a resident c~urx of instruction equivalent to:
(A) not less than four terms of eight months each; or
(B) not less than the number of semester hours required by The
University of Texas for a bachelor of arts or bachelor of science degree;
(3) provides a c~urx of instruction in the fundamental subjects listed in
Section 201.305(b); and
(4) has the necessary teaching staff and facilities for proper instruction in all
of the fundamental subjects listed in Section 201.305(b).
TEX. Oct. CODE ANN. 5 201.303(d) (Vernon Supp. 2006).
The Honorable Florence Shapiro - Page 5
The Honorable Mike Jackson
The Honorable Burt R. Solomons
(GA-0487)
itself. If so construed, section201,302(a)(3)
would require an applicant to complete pre-chiropractic
courses at a “school other than a chiropractic school,” both of which may (or may not) coexist in the
same institution of higher education.
Accordingly,
we conclude that section 201.302(a)(3) of the
Occupations Code does not unambiguously
require a construction that precludes an applicant from
obtaining the required college credit from an institution that offers chiropractic and non-chiropractic
degree programs.
Chapter 201 does not detail the requirements of a “school other than a chiropractic school,”
beyond requiring that the courses be from a college or university whose credits are “accepted by The
University of Texas at Austin for a bachelor of arts or bachelor of science degree.” See TEX. Oct.
CODE ANN. 5 201.303(a) (Vernon
Supp. 2006).
Instead, the legislature has given the Board
broad rule-making
powers to enforce chapter 201, particularly
with reference to licensing.
Id.
5 201,152(a)(2) (giving the Board rule-making authority “relating to the
board’s examination of
an applicant for a license to practice chiropractic”), (b) (‘p roviding that the “board shall adopt rules
for the enforcement
of this chapter”) (Vernon Supp. 2006). A court has recognized the Board’s
authority to determine the meaning of the statutory phrase “bona fide reputable chiropractic school”
in the predecessor to chapter 201 of the Occupations~Code.
See Madden v. Tex. Bd. of Chiropractic
Exam ‘rs, 663 S.W.2d 622,626 (Tex. App.-Austin
1983, writ refd n.r.e.).” We believe the Board
has the authority to likewise clarify by rule what constitutes a “chiropractic school” and a “school
other than a chiropractic school,” provided the Board does so consistently with the provisions of
chapter 201. And because the Board is the agency charged with implementing
chapter 201 and
possesses expertise in the area of chiropractic education, we believe it is premature to address your
remaining
questions.
See State v. Pub. Util. Comm’n, 883 S.W.2d 190, 197 (Tex. 1994) (the
legislature intends to give an agency created to centralize expertise in a certain regulatory area a
“large degree of latitude in the methods it uses to accomplish
its regulatory function”);
Tarrant
Appraisal Dist. v. Moore, 845 S.W.2d 820, 823 (Tex. 1993) (“[clonstruction
of a statute by the
administrative
agency charged with its enforcement
is entitled to serious consideration,
so long as
the construction
is reasonable and does not contradict the plain language of the statute”).
6We Nate that the Board has clarified by mle the meaning of a “bona tide reputable, chiropractic school” as that
phrase appears in chapter 201. 22 Tix ADMIN. CODE 5 71 .S (2006) (Tex. Bd. of Chiropractic Exam%, Applications
and Applicants). The rule provides that a “bona fide reputable, ckpractic
school
is a school which is accredited
by the [CCE].” Id. (emphasis added). The CCE, however, accredits doctor of chiropractic programs that are offered
by certain institutions but generally does not accredit institutions offering such programs unless they are a single-purpose
chiropractic institution. See CCE Standards, su.tka note 4, at 1. Thus, by equating “bona fide reputable, chiropractic
school” with a school accredited by the CCE, rule 71.5 appears to be in tension with the Board’s statement of its
understanding of the meaning of Texas Occupations Code section 201.302(a)(3). See TEX. Oct. CODE ANN. 9
201.302(a)(3) (Vernon Supp. 2006).
The Honorable Florence Shapiro - Page 6
The Honorable Mike Jackson
The Honorable Burt R. Solomons
(GA-0487)
SUMMARY
Section 201.302(a)(3)
of the Occupations
Code requires a
chiropractic license applicant to obtain 90 semester hours of college
credit from a “school other than a chiropractic school.”
The statute
does not, however, unambiguously
preclude such an applicant from
obtaining the required college credit from an institution
of higher
education
that offers a chiropractic
degree program
along with
non-chiropractic
programs.
The Board of Chiropractic
Examiners
possesses
rule-making
authority to determine
what constitutes
a
“school other than a chiropractic school.”
RENT C. SULLIVAN
First Assistant Attorney General
ELLEN L. WITT
Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel
NANCY S. FULLER
Chair, Opinion Committee
William A. Hill
Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee
Attorney General opinions are persuasive, not binding on courts, and answer questions of law, not fact. Text extracted from the official PDF. Not legal advice.