Texas law on any date › Attorney General opinions
Attorney General Opinion GA-0437
Issued November 22, 2005
Re: Maximum salary payable to a district judge under section 659.012 of the Government Code
Cites: GV §659.012, GV §659, GV §012
The Attorney General's page · official PDF
ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF TEXAS
GREG
ABBOTT
June 15,2006
The Honorable Carole Keeton Strayhom
Texas Comptroller
of Public Accounts
Post Office Box 13528
Austin, Texas 78711-3528
Opinion No. GA-0437
Re: Maximum salary payable to a district judge
under section 659.012 of the Government
Code
(RQ-0419-GA)
Dear Comptroller
Strayhorn:
In 2005, during the Second Called Special Session of the Seventy-ninth
Legislature, Texas
judges received a salary increase. You request our opinion on the lawful maximum amount payable
to a state district judge under the provisions of the enacting legislation, House Bill 11.’
House Bill 11, which was codified at section 659.012 ofthe Government Code, was effective
December 1,2005, and provides that
a judge of a district court is entitled to an annual salary from the state
of at least $125,000, except that the combined salary of a district
judge from state and county sources, including compensation
for any
extrajudicial
services performed
on behalf of the county, may not
exceed the amount that is $5,000 less than the salary provided for a
justice of a court of appeals other than a chiefjustice[.]
TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 659.012(a)(l)
(V emon Supp. 2005); Act of Aug. 9,2005,79th
Leg., 2d
C.S., ch. 3, § I,2005 Tex. Gen. Laws 34,35. In addition to the salary provided by the state pursuant
to section 659.012, district judges may also receive additional compensation
from counties for
extrajudicial services they render to their county.* See TEx. GOV’T CODE ANN. 5 32.001 (Vernon
Supp. 2005). A similar scheme provides for the salary of justices of the courts of appeal other than
a chief justice:
‘Letter from Honorable
Car& K&on
Strayhorn, Texas Comptroller
of Public Accounts, to Honorable Greg
Abbott,
Attorney
General of Texas, at I (Nov. 15, 2005) (on file with the Opinion
Committee,
also available at
http://www.oag.state.tx.us).
“For instance, a district judge may serve as a member of the county juvenile board, see TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN.
5 24.306 (Vernon 2004), and establish community supervision and corrections departments.
See id. 5 76.002(a) (Vernon
Supp. 2005).
The Honorable Carole Keeton Strayhom
- Page 2
(GA-0437)
a justice of a court of appeals other than the chiefjustice
is entitled to
an annual salary from the state that is equal to 110 percent of the
salary of a district judge, except that the combined salary of a justice
of the court of appeals other than the chief justice from all state and
county sources, including compensation for any extrajudicial services
performed on behalf of the county, may not exceed the amount that
is $5,000 less than the salary provided for a justice of the supreme
court.
Id. 5 659.012(a)(2).
Chapter 31 of the Government
Code authorizes counties to pay additional
compensation
to justices of the courts of appeal. See id. 5 3 1.001.
To answer your question we must determine what “salary provided for a justice of a court
of appeals” means.
In construing section 659.012, we must give effect to the legislature’s intent.
See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. 5s 311.021, ,023 (Vernon 2005); Albertson’s Inc. v. Sinclair, 984
S.W.2d 958,960 (Tex. 1999). When interpreting a statute, courts look first to the literal text ofthe
statute for its meaning and ordinarily give effect to that plain meaning.
See Sinclair, 984 S.W.2d at
960; Boykin v. State, 818 S.W.2d 782,785 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). A court will look beyond the
literal language of the statute only when “the plain language of [the] statute would lead to absurd
results or ifthe language is
ambiguous.”
Expurte Russell, 60 S.W.3d 875,876 (Tex. Crim. App.
2001) (quoting Boykin, 818 S.W.2d at 785-86).
Under section 659.012, the salary of a district judge is subject to the limitation
that the
judge’s combined state and county salary may not exceed an “amount that is $5,000 less than the
saluryprovidedfor
a justice ofa court of appeals other than a chiefjustice.”
TEX. GOV’T CODE
ANN. 5 659.012(a)(l)
(Vernon Supp. 2005) ( em ph asis added). The maximum salary provided for
a justice of a court of appeals other than a chief justice is “$5,000 less than the salary provided for
[an associate] justice of the supreme court.” Id. § 659,012(a)(2).
The statute provides that the fixed
salary for associate supreme court justices is “120 percent of the salary of a district judge,” or
$150,000.
Id. 5 659,012(a)(3).
Therefore the maximum
salary of an appellate court justice is
$145,000. See id. § 659,012(a)(2), (“the combined salary of a justice of the court of appeals. , . may
not exceed the amount that is $5,000 less than the salary provided for a justice of the supreme
court”). Accordingly, the maximum salary of a district court judge, which is limited to $5,000 less
than the salary provided for a justice of a court of appeals other than a chiefjustice,
is $140,000. See
id. § 659.012(a)(l)
(“the combined salary of a district judge .
may not exceed the amount that is
$5,000 less than the salary provided for a justice of a court of appeals”).
The Honorable Carole Keeton Strayhorn
- Page 3
(GA-0437)
SUMMARY
Under section 659.012 ofthe Government Code themaximum
lawful amount payable to a state district judge is $140,000.
ELLEN L. WITT
Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel
NANCY S. FULLER
Chair, Opinion Committee
Charlotte M. Harper
Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee
Attorney General opinions are persuasive, not binding on courts, and answer questions of law, not fact. Text extracted from the official PDF. Not legal advice.