Texas law on any date › Code of Criminal Procedure
Code of Criminal Procedure §4
In force on Sep 25, 2017 · this text took effect (date not stated) · amended later, effective Sep 01, 2019
(a) If a subsequent application for writ of habeas corpus is filed after final disposition of an initial application challenging the same conviction, a court may not consider the merits of or grant relief based on the subsequent application unless the application contains sufficient specific facts establishing that:
(1) the current claims and issues have not been and could not have been presented previously in an original application or in a previously considered application filed under this article because the factual or legal basis for the claim was unavailable on the date the applicant filed the previous application; or
(2) by a preponderance of the evidence, but for a violation of the United States Constitution no rational juror could have found the applicant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
(b) For purposes of Subsection (a)(1), a legal basis of a claim is unavailable on or before a date described by Subsection (a)(1) if the legal basis was not recognized by and could not have been reasonably formulated from a final decision of the United States Supreme Court, a court of appeals of the United States, or a court of appellate jurisdiction of this state on or before that date.
(c) For purposes of Subsection (a)(1), a factual basis of a claim is unavailable on or before a date described by Subsection (a)(1) if the factual basis was not ascertainable through the exercise of reasonable diligence on or before that date.
History:
Source: the Legislature's file server, seen Nov 08, 2026.
Every version on file
- Effective Sep 01, 2025 · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective Sep 01, 2025 · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective Sep 01, 2019 · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
Attorney General opinions that cite it
- KP-0188 (Sep 25, 2017): Whether postmortem toxicological analysis conducted pursuant to the request of a medical examiner or forensic pathologist is subject to accreditation requirements of the Forensic Science Commission
- KP-0127 (Jul 08, 2016): The admissibility of certain forensic analyses in Texas courts, statutory authority of the Texas Forensic Science Commission, and reporting requirements for certain cnme laboratories
- GA-0888 (May 06, 2011): Whether a prosecutor must obtain the approval of the presiding judge before advancing funds for travel expenses to a nonresident witness
- GA-0866 (Jan 31, 2011): Investigative Authority of the Texas Forensic Science Commission
- GA-0125 (May 27, 2003): Whether a minor may be classified as a “missing child” under article 63.001, Code of Criminal Procedure, if the minor’s legal custodian knows the minor’s whereabouts
- JM-0759 (Jul 28, 1987): Whether the TexasDepartment of Corrections granting of good time to prisoners for time iu- carcerated in a county jail vio- lates section 3(c) of article 6181-l. V.T.C.S.
- WW-0998 (Feb 23, 1961): Constitutionality of H. B. 57, amending Article 680, Code of Criminal Procedure of Texas, to provide for alternate jurors in felony cases'when a juror becomes unable or disqualified to continue. The Criminal Jurisprudence Committee of the House of Representatives has requested an opinion on the constitutionality of H. B. 57, 57th Legis- lature, which would amend Article 680 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Texas, 1925, so as to make Article 680, C. C. P. read as follows: "In felony cases the courtmay direct that one (1) or two (2) jurors in addition to the regular jury be called and impane
- JM-0627: Payment of witness fees under section 35.27 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
- JM-0739: Whether au attorney appointed by a justice of the peace to re- present an indigent is entitled to compensation if he does not appear in court, and related questions
A research copy. The official text is the Legislature's (statutes), the Secretary of State's (Texas Administrative Code) or eCFR's (federal rules). Not legal advice.