Texas law on any date › Code of Criminal Procedure
Code of Criminal Procedure §11
In force on May 27, 2003 · this text took effect (date not stated) · amended later, effective Sep 01, 2015
REPORT INADMISSIBLE AS EVIDENCE
A written report prepared by the commission under this article is not admissible in a civil or criminal action.
History:
Source: the Legislature's file server, seen Nov 08, 2026.
Every version on file
- Effective Sep 01, 2015 · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
Attorney General opinions that cite it
- GA-0114 (May 27, 2003): Whether a community supervision and corrections department may assess a participant in a pretrial intervention program fees under both article 102 .O 12 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and section 76.015(c) of the Government Code
- JM-0950 (Sep 02, 1988): Constitutionality of section 27 of article 42.18 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure re- garding contracting for parole services, and related questions
- WW-0989 (Jan 24, 1961): Questions relative to the construction of Article 781c, Code of Criminal Procedure Your request for an opinion has been received and carefully considered by this office. We quote your letter, in part, as follows: "In order to clarify the procedures relating to Section 2, paragraph (3) of Article 78~2, Code of Criminal Procedure, known as the Uniform Act for Out of State Parolee Supervision, your opinions on the following questions are respectfully requested. It should be noted that all states have adopted this Uniform Act. "1) When the parole or probation of a person, who is being supervised i
- JM-0797: Whether a full pardon is equiv- alent to a restoration of citizen- ship under section 24 of article 42.12, Code of Criminal Procedure You state that the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles is in need of answers to the following questions in determining "whether to change its rules, policy and practice of forwarding case recommenda- tions to the Governor that individuals be restored to full civil rights of citizenship only." 1. Are a full pardon and restoration of full civil rights of citizenship synonymous as stated in U-587 and MW-270? 2. What is the current status of H-587? Has the Opinion be
A research copy. The official text is the Legislature's (statutes), the Secretary of State's (Texas Administrative Code) or eCFR's (federal rules). Not legal advice.