Texas law on any date › Code of Criminal Procedure
Code of Criminal Procedure §10
In force on Nov 09, 2026 · this text took effect Sep 01, 2009 · same as today's text
UNIFORMITY OF INTERPRETATION
This Act shall be so construed as to effect its general purpose to make uniform the laws of those states which enact it.
History: Acts 1983, 68th Leg., p. 1068, ch. 240, Sec. 1, eff. Aug. 29, 1983. Amended by: Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 87 (S.B. 1969 ), Sec. 25.014, eff. September 1, 2009.
Source: the Legislature's file server, seen Nov 08, 2026.
Every version on file
- Effective Sep 01, 2009 · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
- Effective date not stated · seen Nov 2026–Nov 2026
Attorney General opinions that cite it
- GA-0454 (Feb 23, 2006): Whether a sex offender with a reportable conviction based on an out-of-state offense prior to September 1, 1995, must register as a sex offender if he resides in Texas even though he was not under the supervision and control of a Texas-based penal institution, probation department, or parole office for the offense
- JM-0819 (Oct 30, 1987): Reconsideration of Attorney General Opinion JM-422: Whether the same person may serve justice of the peace a:: part time appointed municipal judge of a city within the same county precinct Gentlemen: You have requested that we reconsider the second question addressed in Attorney General Opinion JM-422 (1986). This office was asked whether a person appointed justice of the peace may serve simultaneously as part time appointed municipal judge for a city located in the precinct. Attorney General Opinion JM-422 concluded that the common law doctrine of incompatibility prevented a justice of the pe
- JC-0019: Whether a sheriff of a county governed by article 2372p-3 of the Revised Civil Statutes is required by Code of Criminal Procedure article 17.11, section 2 to refuse the bond of a bondsman licensed in the county when on notice that the bondsman is in default on a bond in another county
A research copy. The official text is the Legislature's (statutes), the Secretary of State's (Texas Administrative Code) or eCFR's (federal rules). Not legal advice.